Jeep Enthusiast Forums banner

Are the new 4 cyl 2.0 engines as good as the v6

8.6K views 22 replies 11 participants last post by  superj  
#1 ·
Hello

new here. I have a 2019. Jeep Wrangler Limited with the v6 engine. Was thinking of getting a new rubicon 2021 with the 4cyl 2.0 ? Good idea or no ?
 
#2 ·
The newer 2.0's eliminated the battery (e-torque). IMHO, that is a good thing.
As far as the engine or the longevity, I don't know. The people that I know with the 2.0L in their jeeps appear to like it. It's reported that the premium fuel requirement is only a recommendation for maximum performance and fuel economy now, which has changed from the initial model year.

The 2.0L has been around for a while in Europe so it's not a new motor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 93YJ4FUN
#3 ·
The newer 2.0's eliminated the battery (e-torque). IMHO, that is a good thing.
As far as the engine or the longevity, I don't know. The people that I know with the 2.0L in their jeeps appear to like it. It's reported that the premium fuel requirement is only a recommendation for maximum performance and fuel economy now, which has changed from the initial model year.

The 2.0L has been around for a while in Europe so it's not a new motor.
Ok thanks so much for your response
 
#7 ·
is not the 2.0l now obsolete?
if yes why own one,?
do your own research on that hybrid, engine
to me , I what parts for 20years, later.
go V6, if you want support
this car is EPA CAFE mandate pain car, never buy EPA forced cars./ever.

ditching...



one BSG write up super good and complex.

I think you have the engine that is obsolete backwards. Just try and find a 2024 Wrangler with the V6 - very difficult to find one. I read recently on another forum that out of over 10,000 Wranglers listed in the Jeep inventory only 793 had the V6.
 
#8 ·
Well, for 2024 the engine choices are the 2.0L turbo AND the 3.6L (non e-torque thankfully) for any JL/JLU. The 4xe comes with the 2.0L only for the ICE powerplant. Neither the 2.0L or the 3.6L are obsolete. The JT is either a 3.6L gas or the 3.0L diesel for 2023. 2024 is rumored to be the 3.6L only and the 4xe 2.0L. I would be really surprised if there is a non electric 2.0L offered in the Gladiator (would really like to see the new inline 6 Hurricane motor in a JT).

Why are there no 3.6L's on the lots? Dealers are not ordering them. Why, who knows. I would guess that Stellantis wants to sell more 2.0L's for CAFE reasons.
 
#10 ·
And you would be correct as I just found out. The 3.6L is only offered with the Rubicon Rubicon X trim as per the 2024 build pages with the automatic. Still available with the stick in all trims.

This really sucks. Jeep needs to get their heads out of their collective Butts. I feel Govt. pressure to meet CAFE numbers creeping in here. The Govt. needs to stop interfering with private businesses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: danesdad
#13 ·
I owned a 2018 2dr Rubi with the V6 and now own a 2023 2dr Rubi with the 2.0l Turbo. Honestly they feel very similar. I like the 4cyl better due to the extra torque at low RPM but overall power output feels pretty much the same.

As far as gas mileage it's not much different for me. I tend to drive more city than highway and both average around 16-18 mpg with my driving style.

If I had it to do over again I would go with the 2.0l because of the broader torque curve. Both engines are good IMO
 
#14 · (Edited)
the sad story is here.
endless complexity. even to the point of the WRANGLER BOX shape is illegal..


more horror

read all that.
and lots of problems, and more to come. say from now to 2029
2019 is not old yet.
 
#17 ·
Grok 3 Jeep 2.0L Turbo cast iron liners: The 2.0-liter turbo 4-cylinder engine in the Jeep Wrangler JL (often referred to as the “Hurricane” or GME-T4) uses a low-pressure, sand-cast aluminum cylinder block with cast-iron liners, and the purpose of those liners aligns with the general benefits I mentioned earlier, tailored to this engine: 1. Enhanced Durability: The 2.0L turbo produces up to 270 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque, putting significant stress on the cylinder walls. Cast-iron liners provide a hard, wear-resistant surface for the pistons and rings, ensuring the cylinders withstand the high-pressure combustion over time, especially under turbocharged conditions. 2. Thermal Management: Turbocharging generates extra heat, and cast iron’s ability to handle high temperatures prevents the aluminum block from warping or degrading. The liners help dissipate heat from the combustion chamber, maintaining engine reliability during aggressive driving or off-roading. 3. Repairability: The liners allow for easier maintenance. If the cylinder walls wear out or get scored, mechanics can replace or re-bore the liners without scrapping the entire block, which is a cost-saving feature for long-term ownership—a plus for Jeep owners who keep their vehicles for years. 4. Better Piston Ring Seal: The cast-iron liners offer a consistent, smooth surface for the piston rings to seal against, minimizing oil blow-by and improving efficiency. This is critical for the 2.0L’s performance and its ability to meet emissions standards. 5. Weight Savings with Strength: The aluminum block keeps the engine lighter (aiding fuel economy and handling in the Wrangler), while the cast-iron liners add durability only where it’s needed—inside the cylinders. This combo suits the JL’s balance of off-road capability and on-road efficiency. In the context of the 2.0L turbo, the cast-iron liners are especially important because turbo engines run hotter and harder than naturally aspirated ones, and Jeep owners often push their vehicles in rugged conditions. The liners ensure the engine can handle those demands while keeping weight down. If you have more questions about this engine or its components, just ask!
 
#19 ·
As far as the 4.0 HO head swap. I picked up a 258 CJ for $1500. It had quite a bit of top end noise. Lucky for me my cousin blew a hole the size of a baseball in her block so I grabbed the head. I added a new timing set, and a Compcam. This thing friggin screams now! I love it and highly recommend it to anyone.
 
#20 ·
Whoa, that is straight out of nowhere.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: JoonHoss
#23 ·
if jeep had made a truck with the 2.0 turbo, i would have bought it. i got a ranger instead though because the v6 has just never impressed me with jeep, as far as performance nor dependability. to many readings on those rocker arms having trouble. ford got rid of the 10r80 in the ranger so the truck is solid now and who can complain about 25mpg on the highway at 80