Lack of common sense which is "stupid" in simple terms.
Lack of common sense which is "stupid" in simple terms..
If it wasn't an accident than what was it? You could call it stupid I guess but like I said I'm sure it wasn't his intent to trash his engine. Most accidents on the roads are caused when someone does something "stupid". In this case the act of stupidity only damaged his vehicle.:thumbsup:
I was thinking the same thing but haven't googled "hydro-locked" yet to see what all it entails.With a hydrolocked engine I would assume that the engine would lock up completely...right?
Yup, according to this, the engine should be locked up:So, this one time in band camp, I went about 35 MPH through 1.5 ft of raging flood water. It was so deep and fast (that's what she said) that it actually broke the front clip on my fender, basically ripping the front of the fender off. I'm really surprised this engine ingested water.
If the engine bent a connecting rod, wouldn't the engine be completely locked up? That takes A LOT of force to bend one of them there things.However, if an engine ingests just enough water to damage it (Bent connecting rod) but not completely lock it up... say 2-3 oz in any one cylinder it can do massive damage as it causes an over pressure.
The Jeep is 9.6:1 from what I've read. I'm not trying to argue or say "you're wrong". Just FYI, I just happen to read it the other day...Engines are typically 9.5 /1.
9.5:1 was just a generalization and a good guess, I guess. No offense taken.If the engine bent a connecting rod, wouldn't the engine be completely locked up? That takes A LOT of force to bend one of them there things.
The Jeep is 9.6:1 from what I've read. I'm not trying to argue or say "you're wrong". Just FYI, I just happen to read it the other day...
It's actually very clear that pass was enough to hydrolock the engine. Do you see the constant stream or roostertail of water to the passenger side of the Jeep going as high as the roofline?wow, I cant believe you actually swamped the intake with that little run.....Looks like there is hardly any water even splashing near the intake. I have also been through water much faster then that and deeper.
One question... I heard you try to start the jeep afterwards and it sounded like the starter was still able to spin the crank.....With a hydrolocked engine I would assume that the engine would lock up completely...right?
:laugh: Thanks for the new signature!!Wow, that's so incredibly specifically vague, I almost completely kind of really don't understand it.
True, I agree. The thing is, you would have to have one hell of a lucky splashe to hit the small little splash preventer snorkel on the airbox to fill it. Or, it would accumulate over time as mentioned already. But, I can't see it making its way past the filter (if cotton). I have seen a stock cotton filter stop water from passing it (and air when wet) so many time now, I guess I am just convinced of it's ability to protect the engine from water damage. Don't get me wrong, I'm no fool. I know that these things aren't invinceable, or impenetrable. I just can't beleive a run like THAT one, would kill it. I KNOW that it can, I just can't beleive it. You know?You can definitely tell by the speed that you'd be kicking up a ****load of water into the engine bay.