I have pretty much everything in in list already done that I have the axles and such to measure off of.You can NEVER go wrong with the basics.
Disc brake brackets. Cool gussets. Trusses. Foot pegs. Diff covers/skids. Shock towers/tabs. Etc etc.
3d autocad sucks so bad. If I was working on solid works I would be open to something like this, but even though auto cad is a amazingly powerful piece of software, 3d design is almost completely useless with it if you consider how much time and energy it takes to learn even the most basic design skills in 3d AC.If you're doing much modding to your Jeep at all, I highly recommend drawing it in 3D. Not necessarily the entire Jeep (but that wouldn't be bad), but at least the front and rear end of the frame, rough in the body (doesn't necessarily need all the contours); however, it aids greatly when you're designing bumpers, rock rails, and etc. It's also handy when you want to see what the profile is going to look like with "X" amount of lift or stretch.
I've done quite a bit of design lately. I'll be cutting back as I'm back in college now. My classes from here on out are so time intensive that I doubt I'll be doing much side work. If you want to donate a chassis for the cause, I'll work on in my spare time. Unfortunately my yj frame is completely shot and the PO has already beat and cut it so many times I wouldn't begin to know where the factory frame war originally locatedIf your looking for some real good practice definitely the chassis would be a huge help to everyone.
I can post all this stuff. I don't have any trusses but I have a couple dana 44s in the garage that will be getting some soon enough. I have to cut, shorten and lengthen them before they are ready. What do you mean by "with armor tie-ins"? As in Differential cover tie-ins and pinion supports?What about truss kits? Something similar to Artec, etc.. Basic piece-assembly trusses for the standard axles, with armor tie-ins maybe. Control arm mounts. Track bar mounts. Etc. etc.
Look at page 4, I personally posted this. Maybe this "somehow" is because you haven't looked.And somehow I've never seen drawings for something as simple as a diff cover for D60,D44, 14b, etc.
I could post all 157 or so pages I have built, I would prefer to only post the ones that people actually request.I've just seen "I've got plans for these, but I'm keeping them because I might try to make money from them." I'm not against someone making money from their work at all. I'm just saying that if you want a idea of something to design and share, there ya go.
If you can draw an object using a polyline, the only real additional commands that you need to know are extrude, revolve, slice, subtract, align, interfere, and union. There are a lot of handy commands that you can pick up as you go; however there isn't much you can't do with a good understanding of 2D AutoCAD and the commands listed above coupled with the ability to envision parts in three dimensions. I have a ton of engineering software at my disposal, but when I decide to rough something out, 9 times out of 10 I do it in AutoCAD.3d autocad sucks so bad. If I was working on solid works I would be open to something like this, but even though auto cad is a amazingly powerful piece of software, 3d design is almost completely useless with it if you consider how much time and energy it takes to learn even the most basic design skills in 3d AC.
Neat, I have a Low pinion waggy d44 I've been thinking about trussing, but haven't gotten around to drawing a truss up yet. This will save quite a bit of time. I appreciate it.This fits a wagoneer width HP D44.
I am going to agree and disagree with this...lolIf you can draw an object using a polyline, the only real additional commands that you need to know are extrude, revolve, slice, subtract, align, interfere, and union. There are a lot of handy commands that you can pick up as you go; however there isn't much you can't do with a good understanding of 2D AutoCAD and the commands listed above coupled with the ability to envision parts in three dimensions. I have a ton of engineering software at my disposal, but when I decide to rough something out, 9 times out of 10 I do it in AutoCAD.
A large part of my reasoning for this is the way you build it in the program. You build things in the program using the same processes you do in the shop with real material. It may take you a little more time (at least when you're new to it), but it's much easier to avoid designing yourself into a corner.
Disclaimer:
I've been using AutoCAD professionally for about 20 years. I'll admit that I have some bias. That being said, I've worked with SolidWorks, Pro-E, Inventor, Mudbox, Mechanical Desktop, GDS, and a whole bunch of other stuff that you've never heard of and plain old AutoCAD is still my go to software. It's a workhorse and there simply isn't anything else out there that will cover the range of work that you can do with it.
Disclaimer Part II:
My "needs" may be a bit different than yours. I don't draw parts for practice. If I'm drawing a part, I'm either trying to decide whether it's worth the effort to build, or I've decided to build it and it's too complex to build on the fly without wasting a lot of material or time. Also, in addition to using design software for the standard "cutting and welding with a little forming where absolutely required" type of fabrication work that most folks on this site do, I also use it for machining work, sheetmetal forming, and metal casting. I need a program that is fairly capable in all these areas because I often have combinations of different fabrication disciplines that come together as an assembly.
In other words, mileage will vary, but give AutoCAD another shot. You don't have to use every command in the book.
I have used SolidWorks for all of these fields and it is very capable of all of these.I also use it for machining work, sheetmetal forming, and metal casting. I need a program that is fairly capable in all these areas because I often have combinations of different fabrication disciplines that come together as an assembly.
Is it my eyes tricking me, or do you have a bend in there?Bracket for mounting Chevy 3/4T calipers to Spidertrax knuckles. Drill and tap holes to 7/16-20.
Its flat.Is it my eyes tricking me, or do you have a bend in there?