Gas tank - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Compass & Patriot Forum > Gas tank

Oconee Off-Road Now Offering Zone Off-Road Products!!!RIGID LED Light Blowout Sale - All Sizes, All Series, all USA Standard Chromoly Front Axle Shaft Kits with Dana 30 4

Reply
Unread 01-13-2007, 06:29 PM   #1
echocat22
Registered User
2007 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 131
Gas tank

checked the book, have a compass sport 4x4, would guess all have the same gas tank volume, is it really only 13.5 gallons

echocat22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2007, 12:20 AM   #2
Jgrillz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
Yea the gas tank seems small.
Jgrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2007, 05:33 AM   #3
echocat22
Registered User
2007 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 131
my subaru 2.5rs(2885 pounds) had a 14.9 gallon tank, i figured the compass would of had a least that, oh well
echocat22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-02-2007, 07:24 PM   #4
flatlanderep
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Somalia
Posts: 28
my neighbor just bought one of these, filled up the tank and on the way back to the house, the GAS TANK FELL OUT!!!!
talk about irony huh?

....bring it back to the dealership and ask them to replace your tank
I think the recall number is #45311-982
flatlanderep is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2007, 09:32 AM   #5
XJ2Timer
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Temple, TX
Posts: 730
I dislike how the gas tanks are getting smaller. I suppose it is for two reasons. One is for handling. To tune the suspension between a full and near empty tank the smaller capacity results in less of a weight difference. Second is fuel economy. If the vehicle is more fuel efficent they think the tank can be smaller which also by carrying less fuel/weight it also helps mpg. This all sounds great, in theory. But what if you are traveling hundreds of miles? To make the trip as short as possible it might make more sense to drive a larger vehicle with a larger gas tank. Sure I'll spend more in gas but I might be able to travel farther/longer without stops with the larger vehicle. I'd gladly trade many of the convenience items on a vehicle for a larger tank.
__________________
1st one- 1989 Cherokee Laredo. 12 great years
2nd one- 2001 Cherokee Limited. Got it before they were gone.
XJ2Timer is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2007, 10:20 AM   #6
Gramps
The Necessary Evil
 
Gramps's Avatar
2007 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Madison/Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,623
Quote:
Originally Posted by XJ2Timer
I dislike how the gas tanks are getting smaller. I suppose it is for two reasons. One is for handling. To tune the suspension between a full and near empty tank the smaller capacity results in less of a weight difference. Second is fuel economy. If the vehicle is more fuel efficent they think the tank can be smaller which also by carrying less fuel/weight it also helps mpg. This all sounds great, in theory. But what if you are traveling hundreds of miles? To make the trip as short as possible it might make more sense to drive a larger vehicle with a larger gas tank. Sure I'll spend more in gas but I might be able to travel farther/longer without stops with the larger vehicle. I'd gladly trade many of the convenience items on a vehicle for a larger tank.
I tend to agree that the gas tank could be bigger, in the 16 – 18 gal range so that I could comfortably go 400 miles non stop, the 300 mile range is adequate for my weekly commute if I have no side trips. I’m sure that one of the reasons that I do enjoy the smaller tank is purely psychological; it takes fewer dollars to fill it up but, it wouldn’t matter if I still filled up only once a week. It was also OK on the cross country trip because there are plenty of stations along the way and we made frequent stops to look for “treasures”. If someone made a larger aftermarket tank I may be interested in it.

I don’t think that the handling would be adversely affected because I believe that weight distribution is calculated on ˝ tank capacity and that would only affect it by 1 ˝ - 2 ˝ gallons and it would be low in the center of gravity.
__________________
Bob

Artificial intelligence is no substitute for natural stupidity

MK Skid Plate fasteners for sale posts 68 & 69

Also visit me at Photobucket
'06 WK Grand Cherokee Limited Quadra-Drive II, 5.7
'07 MK Compass Limited 4X4, AutoStick
Gramps is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-03-2007, 12:34 PM   #7
snikr
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vermont, Vermont
Posts: 123
Yes....3 or 4 more gallons would be nice. Seeing as we only put about 145 miles a week on the Compass it's not a big problem right now.

Tom
__________________
2010 Subaru Forester
2004 Dodge Dakota 4 X 4


So many roads.......So little vacation time
snikr is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-04-2007, 08:55 AM   #8
BuzzDog
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rogers, AR
Posts: 91
I don't necessarily see a sweeping trend toward smaller tanks. For example, my first new car was a 1980 Mustang Ghia with a 200 c.i. inline six (remember the era before you start teasing me mercilessly); I seem to recall that its tank held somewhere around 12 gallons, and it was hard pressed to get 18 mpg, for a cruising range of less than 200 miles unless you ran it bone dry.

It seems that automakers shoot for somewhere around a minimum of 250 miles to a tank, using the EPA mileage figures multiplied by capacity.

A couple of nice things about not having a huge tank: When I travel a lot for work my Jeep sometimes goes only 100 miles or so in a month, so I don't have to worry about the fuel breaking down if I don't get around to topping off the tank, even though major fuel breakdown is fairly unlikely. Second, gasoline formulations in some markets are slightly modified to reduce emissions as temperatures fluctuate; in other words, the "winter formula" for fuel is slightly different than the ones used in other seasons. A smaller tank might make a slight difference in the quality of the air you breathe, and I'm all for breathing better air.

But again, those two advantages are a bit of a stretch...in reality, I think that manufacturers strike a compromise between weight, range and the ability to fit a tank within the vehicle.
BuzzDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.