Different CVT possiblities in the future? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Compass & Patriot Forum > Different CVT possiblities in the future?

All Bilstein shocks & struts - Lowest Prices Ever and Poison Spyder DeFenders™ - "Tubeless" Jeep FendeSanta Kolak Announces: Kolak Exhaust 20% Off Sale!

Reply
Unread 11-14-2007, 08:18 PM   #1
unclejjg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 84
Different CVT possiblities in the future?

The MK CVT's are produced by Jatco Ltd. Right now the MK's are using the JF011E model, which is rated for 2.5 liter engines and lower.

However, there are also CVT's made by Jatco that are capable of handling higher torque capacity and up to 3.5 liter engines. The JF010E is an example. This CVT is currently used on the Nissan Murano.

I have to imagine that in future models, Jeep may opt for one of these units. Perhaps the higher torque capacity would allow for a diesel engine/CVT combination (more torque and even better mpg). Perhaps it would allow for a lower "crawl ratio" for the FDII models (maybe 25:1 or something along those lines).

Couple that with the interest the MK's are beginning to garner with aftermarket suppliers, and we could see an even more capable set of vehicles in the future.

Here to building off of the successes and learning from the failures of 1st year models.

unclejjg is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 11-14-2007, 09:26 PM   #2
Gramps
The Necessary Evil
 
Gramps's Avatar
2007 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Madison/Janesville, Wisconsin
Posts: 5,624
I've thought about the use of the bigger Jatco CVT but that won't necessarily affect your final drive ratio. The range on both the CVT2 and the CVT2L is 2.35 - 0.39. It's the final drive that gives the crawl ratio; a final drive of 2.41 is mated with the CVT2 and 3.21 is mated to the CVT2L. That coupled with the other program features of the Off-road mode is what sets it apart. Since the crawl ratio is created by the final drive you're also lowering your top end for freeway cruising. There has to be a compromise since there is no Hi - Lo range.

How about with a 3.3 V6. Anybody got a shoe horn?
__________________
Bob

Artificial intelligence is no substitute for natural stupidity

MK Skid Plate fasteners for sale posts 68 & 69

Also visit me at Photobucket
'06 WK Grand Cherokee Limited Quadra-Drive II, 5.7
'07 MK Compass Limited 4X4, AutoStick
Gramps is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.