Rubicon express lift question - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > JK Wrangler Technical Forum > Rubicon express lift question

Trick Tabs - NalinMFG.comCCOR is your 1 stop source for everything Jeep!TJ 5.25" Speaker Adapters - NalinMFG

Reply
Unread 08-12-2013, 09:56 AM   #16
nwbronco
Registered User
2014 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 1,240
The RE Arms are adjustable. Pinion correction is fairly straightforward. Front and rear. So instead of calling the long arms for the sake of them being actually longer, which seems to have you in total disagreement. Can I call them adjustable arms, which they are as well. And we can be a bit more agreeable?

Either way, I respect your opinion, and am just expressing mine as well.


Bob K.

__________________
His 14 Anvil JK
Hers 09 Blue JK
Kid's '08 Yellow JKU
'13 Black 10A Rubicon JKU
nwbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-12-2013, 10:02 AM   #17
spyder6
Got that Toyota chit
 
spyder6's Avatar
2010  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 12,044
You can call them adjustable arms, but that doesn't detract from the point that they're a lot longer than they need to be. If he already has adjustable arms that came with his kit he isn't gaining anything worthwhile to justify the cost and time investment. JK arms are already in the kid 20s for length, a far cry longer than the 15-16" control arms of the TJ. lengthening them even further past 23-24" isn't going to give you a significant advantage in performance at all.
__________________
2010 Magnetic Toyota 4Runner Trail Teams

My builds: Bruiser and The Grey

|Forge Overland| or follow us on Facebook
spyder6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-12-2013, 12:11 PM   #18
4wdjeepguy
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anderson, South Carolina
Posts: 1,591
They're junk. No arguing about it.
4wdjeepguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-12-2013, 12:22 PM   #19
nwbronco
Registered User
2014 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 1,240
Great info. Although I will disagree. I have the 3.5" RE lift on my '07 JKU, and the 4.5 'adjustable arm' on the missus '09 and it articulates much better than mine. On the same trail, she gets through with little to no body roll. Mine gets to the control arm arc end and I am done. No more traction until I push through. I would love to have those arms on my rig. Not any time soon though. We both run 37's, mine are MTRs, hers are Toyo MTs. All that said, I wouldn't pay $500 for those arms unless the seller replaces all the bushings. Poly Performance makes a great replacement set.

Bob K.
__________________
His 14 Anvil JK
Hers 09 Blue JK
Kid's '08 Yellow JKU
'13 Black 10A Rubicon JKU
nwbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-14-2013, 10:17 AM   #20
bikkerdude
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah
Posts: 180
Thanks guys for the input. I passed on that lift and got a 3" teraflex lift instead. I will upgrade to a 4.5" later on.

Thanks again for all the feedback!
__________________
2007 JKU
bikkerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-18-2013, 11:46 PM   #21
AEVBrute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 82
I have one of the few 2 doors that I have ever seen with a long arm and 5.7 Hemi conversion. If I had to it again I would not do a long arm, dont get me wrong it drives great.
dscn0012.jpg  
AEVBrute is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2013, 07:27 AM   #22
nwbronco
Registered User
2014 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 1,240
Here is the missus' 2DR.

__________________
His 14 Anvil JK
Hers 09 Blue JK
Kid's '08 Yellow JKU
'13 Black 10A Rubicon JKU
nwbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2013, 10:55 AM   #23
AEVBrute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwbronco View Post
Great info. Although I will disagree. I have the 3.5" RE lift on my '07 JKU, and the 4.5 'adjustable arm' on the missus '09 and it articulates much better than mine. On the same trail, she gets through with little to no body roll. Mine gets to the control arm arc end and I am done. No more traction until I push through. I would love to have those arms on my rig. Not any time soon though. We both run 37's, mine are MTRs, hers are Toyo MTs. All that said, I wouldn't pay $500 for those arms unless the seller replaces all the bushings. Poly Performance makes a great replacement set.

Bob K.
can you explain what you mean by getting to the control arm arc end?
AEVBrute is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2013, 12:23 PM   #24
nwbronco
Registered User
2014 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 1,240
Quote:
Originally Posted by AEVBrute View Post
can you explain what you mean by getting to the control arm arc end?
The control arm bracket mounted to the axle creates the 'stop' of the arc. My lift is 3.5" about the max for the stock control arms. Running disconnected, the axle will drop out until the axle side hits the stop, and the same for the frame mount. Long before the spring or shock reach their limits.

Bob K.
__________________
His 14 Anvil JK
Hers 09 Blue JK
Kid's '08 Yellow JKU
'13 Black 10A Rubicon JKU
nwbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2013, 02:28 PM   #25
4wdjeepguy
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anderson, South Carolina
Posts: 1,591
Idk why you went long arms and still have the same shock size as a mid-arm with the same amount of lift.
4wdjeepguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-19-2013, 03:08 PM   #26
nwbronco
Registered User
2014 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Olympia, Washington
Posts: 1,240
Talking two different rigs here. Mine" 07 JKU with 3.5" Rubicon Express standard lift with OME Long travel shocks. This one does not flex as much as:
Hers: '09 JK 4.5" Rubicon Express Long Arm kit.

Bob K.
__________________
His 14 Anvil JK
Hers 09 Blue JK
Kid's '08 Yellow JKU
'13 Black 10A Rubicon JKU
nwbronco is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-20-2013, 06:13 AM   #27
spyder6
Got that Toyota chit
 
spyder6's Avatar
2010  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 12,044
It's more than long arms though. The factory JK location points will articulate through 16" of travel with no bind with proper components.

The blanketing that the long arm flexes harder than the mid arm is much too vague as there are dozens of individual components that attribute to capability of ones suspension.
__________________
2010 Magnetic Toyota 4Runner Trail Teams

My builds: Bruiser and The Grey

|Forge Overland| or follow us on Facebook
spyder6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-20-2013, 06:21 PM   #28
SoK66
Registered User
1976 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Durango, CO
Posts: 1,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyder6 View Post
JKs come from the factory with mid arms. The money spent on long arms vs the gain in specific performance attributed to a longer control arm is not worth it. The same principles from a TJ don't apply to a JK
I thought the same until I drove a long arm JK. I immediately did an upgrade and would never go back. Much more stable on & off road. YMMV, of course, but you can't make a blanket statement that long arms aren't necessary.

OP, from the photo that looks like the early version of the RE 4.5" long arm kit. They had many issues with bushing life on those. I'd pass.
SoK66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-20-2013, 07:17 PM   #29
4wdjeepguy
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Anderson, South Carolina
Posts: 1,591
Dude you have no idea what you're talking about
4wdjeepguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 08-20-2013, 08:21 PM   #30
spyder6
Got that Toyota chit
 
spyder6's Avatar
2010  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 12,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoK66 View Post
I thought the same until I drove a long arm JK. I immediately did an upgrade and would never go back. Much more stable on & off road. YMMV, of course, but you can't make a blanket statement that long arms aren't necessary.

OP, from the photo that looks like the early version of the RE 4.5" long arm kit. They had many issues with bushing life on those. I'd pass.
exactly the same thing i just said, you're blanketing a long arm without understanding what and why the long arm is doing for you. i really dislike AEV's suspensions, but id be wiling to bet that an AEV dual sport 3.5 will out handle all of the long arm suspension KIT's available
__________________
2010 Magnetic Toyota 4Runner Trail Teams

My builds: Bruiser and The Grey

|Forge Overland| or follow us on Facebook
spyder6 is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.