JeepForum.com

JeepForum.com (http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/)
-   JK Wrangler Technical Forum (http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f96/)
-   -   New diesel as early as 2008!!!!??? (http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f96/new-diesel-early-2008-a-323077/)

David Hinton 10-02-2006 10:21 PM

New diesel as early as 2008!!!!???
 
Is this correct?

I was serching on other forums and a couple of people have sources that say there will be a new diesel engine by 2008?? is this right, or is this old news??




Also, with the weight of a diesle and the higher diesel fuel prices, would mpg gain be 1 or maybe 2 mpg???



Thanks!!

SecondTJ 10-02-2006 10:49 PM

higher fuel prices dont affect mpg....

i think more people want a diesel for its massive torque output, rather than getting better mileage

Laxstar46 10-02-2006 10:52 PM

:thumbsup:
Quote:

Originally Posted by SecondTJ
higher fuel prices dont affect mpg....

i think more people want a diesel for its massive torque output, rather than getting better mileage

:thumbsup: :thumbsup:

300bhp/ton 10-03-2006 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SecondTJ
higher fuel prices dont affect mpg....

i think more people want a diesel for its massive torque output, rather than getting better mileage

Nope, and that's exactly why you haven't had a diesel in the past in the US.

In the Uk (and Europe) we had the very excerllent VM 2.5 TD unit in the Cherokee and Grand Cherokee (I think). This was purly for economy reasons.

I would guess that a diesel should offer 'significant' gains in mpg over a petrol engine. Typically most models see ~25-35% better.

Myers97TJ 10-03-2006 02:02 AM

I talked with some of the engineers at camp jeep and while they could not give me a direct answer they said they would not be supprised to see the diesel in the 2008 wrangler, if that helps at all.

BlaineWasHere 10-03-2006 06:28 AM

This is ALL speculation. We DO know that there is a CRD motor over seas. Thats all we know.

All we can do is WAIT and see if next year it arrives. Or the year after. That is the only real way to know.

A small V8 (like the 4.7 in the WJ/WK/XK) may be a more likly possiblity for one reason: emmisions (sp?)

If the CRD does make it into the JK I would exect to see nice fuel gains particularly on the highway. I know it has brick like aero working against it but I could see 25-27 at highway speeds. But city would only be 1 maybe 2 MPG better. Again all speculation if it even happened.

jpaddict 10-03-2006 09:24 AM

My unborn baby Rubi, while still awaiting its moment of conception in Toledo, will have to go up for adoption the instant the diesels arrive.

BlaineWasHere 10-03-2006 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jpaddict
My unborn baby Rubi, while still awaiting its moment of conception in Toledo, will have to go up for adoption the instant the diesels arrive.


Wow you do treat Jeeps like kids!:rofl:

LEDFoot 10-03-2006 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SecondTJ
higher fuel prices dont affect mpg....

i think more people want a diesel for its massive torque output, rather than getting better mileage

Better gas mileage is important for off roading as well when you consider the range you can go on one tank.
Another benefit of diesel for of roading is fording capabilities; since a diesel doesn't have an ignition system you don't have to worry about water leaking into it killing your engine while in water.


That said, unless DC is planning on putting the 3.0 CRD in the JK I don't expect to see one in the JK until at least 09. As far as I know, the 3.0 CRD is the only diesel that DC has certified with the EPA.
Of course, the 3.0 CRD would be incredible in the JK.

BrianLSU 10-03-2006 12:03 PM

Here are the specs on the 3.0 CRD I found. It would be a nice upgrade, but not enough. I still want the 4.7.

The new 3.0-liter CRD engine, built by Mercedes-Benz, produces 215 hp (160 kW) @ 3800 rpm and 376 lb.-ft. torque (510 Nm) @ 1600-2800 rpm and gets an estimated fuel economy of 19 miles city and 23 miles highway.

daciuk55 10-03-2006 12:18 PM

Would any of these diesels be avaliable with a manual tranny?

Wheelin98TJ 10-03-2006 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianLSU
Here are the specs on the 3.0 CRD I found. It would be a nice upgrade, but not enough. I still want the 4.7.

The new 3.0-liter CRD engine, built by Mercedes-Benz, produces 215 hp (160 kW) @ 3800 rpm and 376 lb.-ft. torque (510 Nm) @ 1600-2800 rpm and gets an estimated fuel economy of 19 miles city and 23 miles highway.

I'm curious what you think the 4.7 holds over the new 3.0L CRD?

newguy66 10-03-2006 12:44 PM

The 3.0L CRD will not fit in the JK.The motor and trany are to big and it being a MB it's going cost alot of $$$$$$.:(

BlaineWasHere 10-03-2006 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by newguy66
The 3.0L CRD will not fit in the JK.The motor and trany are to big and it being a MB it's going cost alot of $$$$$$.:(

The 3.0 is going in the WK I don't see what won't fit about the JK. Who cares give me the 2.8 CRD and I'll chip it!

Snuffster 10-03-2006 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BrianLSU
Here are the specs on the 3.0 CRD I found. It would be a nice upgrade, but not enough. I still want the 4.7.

The new 3.0-liter CRD engine, built by Mercedes-Benz, produces 215 hp (160 kW) @ 3800 rpm and 376 lb.-ft. torque (510 N•m) @ 1600-2800 rpm and gets an estimated fuel economy of 19 miles city and 23 miles highway.

The 3.0 would be a better engine for the Wrangler. The 4.7 makes 235/300 compared to 215/376 of the diesel.


The time now is 03:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.