MSN mentions a Diesal model? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > JK Wrangler Technical Forum > MSN mentions a Diesal model?

Rough Country Jeep Suspension Deals at Rockridge 4WD!Looking to re-gear?! CRAZY DEALS ON YUKON GEARS right hereJK specific skid plates from Clayton Off Road Mfg.

Reply
Unread 09-21-2006, 09:06 AM   #1
caladin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SO CAL
Posts: 8
MSN mentions a Diesal model?

http://autos.msn.com/as/minishow/art...&s=NewYork2006

Why not in the US?

caladin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 09:28 AM   #2
LEDFoot
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 762
EPA regulations. CARB regulations. It's just much more difficult to pass a diesel through our environmental regulations than Europe's.
(Of course that's a total double standard since you can buy a diesel pickup and pollute all you want, but an suv or a TDI Golf that get's 40+ miles to the gallon, no way!)
LEDFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 10:15 AM   #3
blackbirdcd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Bothell, Washington
Posts: 58
That's generalizing.

There are new EPA regluations coming online in 2007 - EVERY car maker is skipping '07 Diesel engine introduction until their powerplants are in line with the new regulations.
blackbirdcd is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 11:08 AM   #4
ghostship
Registered User
1978 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackbirdcd
That's generalizing.
No, that's not generalizing, it is fact. The currently available 2.8L CRD engine does not meet 2007 EPA regulations, so it cannot be offered in the US in its present form. Also, since it is not economically viable for this engine to be re-designed in order to compy with 2007 and beyond EPA regulations, it will not be offered in any US model in the future.
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackbirdcd
There are new EPA regluations coming online in 2007 - EVERY car maker is skipping '07 Diesel engine introduction until their powerplants are in line with the new regulations.
Nope, not EVERY car maker, since Jeep is offering their new 3.0 BlueTec Diesel THIS FALL in it's 2007 line-up.
ghostship is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 12:11 PM   #5
Jason, aka: Jeepin.com
Vendor
 
Jason, aka: Jeepin.com's Avatar
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 7,181
Dodge is also debuting their new 6.7L Cummins in the '07 model Rams.
__________________
Jason West - Jeepin.com | JeepinOutfitters.com
'09 JKUR, RE 3.5", 37" GY MT/R-Ks, Expedition One bumpers, T&T rockers & skids, XRC10 Comp
'95 XJ, RE 5.5", 35" MT/Rs, D30 w/hubs & ARB, D44 w/Detroit, 4.56s, C4x4 bumpers, etc, etc.
'00 TJ, SOLD, wife's, RE 4.5" long-arm, 35" MT/Rs, D30+OX, D44+ARB, 4.88s, full cage, winch, C4x4 & Jeeperman bumpers, etc, etc.


Jason, aka: Jeepin.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 01:22 PM   #6
BrianLSU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason, aka: Jeepin.com
Dodge is also debuting their new 6.7L Cummins in the '07 model Rams.
Imagine that in a new JK Unlimited.
BrianLSU is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 01:25 PM   #7
Jason, aka: Jeepin.com
Vendor
 
Jason, aka: Jeepin.com's Avatar
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lewisville, TX
Posts: 7,181
lol! they'd have to put lead in the rear frame rails just to keep it from going endo sitting still! (that engine's going to be heavy)
__________________
Jason West - Jeepin.com | JeepinOutfitters.com
'09 JKUR, RE 3.5", 37" GY MT/R-Ks, Expedition One bumpers, T&T rockers & skids, XRC10 Comp
'95 XJ, RE 5.5", 35" MT/Rs, D30 w/hubs & ARB, D44 w/Detroit, 4.56s, C4x4 bumpers, etc, etc.
'00 TJ, SOLD, wife's, RE 4.5" long-arm, 35" MT/Rs, D30+OX, D44+ARB, 4.88s, full cage, winch, C4x4 & Jeeperman bumpers, etc, etc.


Jason, aka: Jeepin.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 01:44 PM   #8
BrianLSU
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 33
LOL, yea............................but it would be sweet.

Talk about going from one extreme to the other.
BrianLSU is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 02:12 PM   #9
LEDFoot
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackbirdcd
That's generalizing.

There are new EPA regluations coming online in 2007 - EVERY car maker is skipping '07 Diesel engine introduction until their powerplants are in line with the new regulations.
Umm... ok maybe it's general, but it's also true. I'm not sure what your point is..
LEDFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 03:10 PM   #10
CoriolisSTORM
BURN IT DOWN POOKIE!!!
 
CoriolisSTORM's Avatar
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: ???, Alabama
Posts: 1,165
Yeah, CARB basically tells the Feds what to do... ****heads. You can get a diesel pickup, but a fuel efficient cleaner car you can hardly get.
__________________
Quote:
Its like a (silly censor)roach, the Wrangler - you can't kill it And now there's a four door. Joy.
CoriolisSTORM is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2006, 10:00 PM   #11
Jerry All-Bran
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Escondido, California
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoriolisSTORM
Yeah, CARB basically tells the Feds what to do... ****heads. You can get a diesel pickup, but a fuel efficient cleaner car you can hardly get.
Why do you think the GM H2/H3 is pushed so hard. Think of all the money being lost by the higherups if you saved it. Pfft...common now, what would Cheney do w/o his personal driver or chef. Gah, that'd be a dastardly life w/o those....
Jerry All-Bran is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-22-2006, 08:14 AM   #12
LEDFoot
Registered User
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: DFW area, Texas
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by CoriolisSTORM
Yeah, CARB basically tells the Feds what to do... ****heads. You can get a diesel pickup, but a fuel efficient cleaner car you can hardly get.
Well one of the problems in general for diesels in the US (other than pickups that can pollute however which way they want but that's a different story) is that both the EPA and the CARB is so dead set on regulating NOx emissions very strictly. In Europe they are more concerned with regulating CO2 emissions whish the EPA could apparently care less about.
Diesel engines are very good with their CO2 emissions, but somewhat problematic with NOx emissions (because of their high compression), this is why they can be used in Europe but not here.

It's also a pretty weird emission component to regulate because it does not come from the fuel like the CO2 does, the NOx is a by product of the gasses in the air reacting with each other under high pressure and heat. (When I put on my tin-foil hat I think that the government regulating NOx rather than CO2 is done to the american auto and oil industry since it does not penalize gas guzzlers, it really doesn't matter how much fuel you consume as far as NOx emissions goes while CO2 emissions is directly related to fuel consumption).

Another problem that diesel has been facing in the US is the crappy diesel fuel that we have had up until now. Europe mandated ultra-low sulphur diesel (ULSD) many years ago, but here, thanks in large to trucking industry lobbyist groups we've been stuck with the high sulphur diesel. The high sulphur content will quickly ruin emission control equipment (catalytic converters, particulate trap filters etc.) on diesel engines. So while it has been possible to use these technologies to clean up diesel exhaust a bit in Europe, it has been impossible to use here.
LEDFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.