Might be an old question but thought I would ask. - JeepForum.com
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 5 Old 07-25-2014, 09:04 AM Thread Starter
bdhinkson
Registered User
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 3
Might be an old question but thought I would ask.

So I am brand new to the forum and to the Jeep life. Just bought a 2010 JKU and was curious what ya'lls thoughts were on upgrading the air intake and exhaust. Searching through it looks like these mods seem to be a waste, so I wanted to know if my money was better spent somewhere else.

Thanks!

bdhinkson is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 5 Old 07-25-2014, 09:36 AM
jwmbishop
Accidental Obfuscator
 
jwmbishop's Avatar
2011 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: corsicana
Posts: 6,150
For the most part - unless you change compression ratio, Cam profile/timing, valve size, cylinder head port shape/size, intake runner shape/size, ignition timing and fuel curve (last two controlled by computer algorithms) all of which determine the engines volumetric efficiency - changing intake and exhaust has negligible effect over the entire torque curve. It may have an effect to say the amount of torque at 3100 is increased but the amount at 2800 is decreased - no real gain and no way to measure it - seat of pants is NOT reliable because other senses (sound smell etc) effect your opinion (sounds faster and smells leaner so must be right?).

AND we drive at 1100 to 3500 - that range works best with small diameter (thus higher air velocity) intake. Increasing the size of the intake has the same volume of air moving much slower - less effective at lower RPMs. Just compare a 360 magnum head to a 360 head - the magnum makes more torque sooner than the 360 - and the ports are noticeably different!

If you have a 1/2 pipe supply a faucet with a 3/4 inch hose attached - would you get more flow by hooking a 1" hose to it? NO - same gallon per hour, as the faucet (just like the compression ratio, cam profile/timing, port shape and volume) is the limiting factor.

J Wm Bishop EA, ASADE
The wagon should, of course, be as light as possible, but strength should not be sacrificed to lightness, for on any but the regularly traveled roads, the wagon will get many a hard knock...
jwmbishop is offline  
post #3 of 5 Old 07-25-2014, 10:42 AM Thread Starter
bdhinkson
Registered User
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 3
Thanks for the detailed response! Having used those items in the past on other vehicles, I thought I would ask. Looks like I will be using those funds towards towards better off-road experience. Thanks again!
bdhinkson is offline  
post #4 of 5 Old 07-25-2014, 06:05 PM
HappyTrails
Registered Voter w/ID
 
HappyTrails's Avatar
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: West Georgia
Posts: 2,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwmbishop View Post
For the most part - unless you change compression ratio, Cam profile/timing, valve size, cylinder head port shape/size, intake runner shape/size, ignition timing and fuel curve (last two controlled by computer algorithms) all of which determine the engines volumetric efficiency - changing intake and exhaust has negligible effect over the entire torque curve. It may have an effect to say the amount of torque at 3100 is increased but the amount at 2800 is decreased - no real gain and no way to measure it - seat of pants is NOT reliable because other senses (sound smell etc) effect your opinion (sounds faster and smells leaner so must be right?).

AND we drive at 1100 to 3500 - that range works best with small diameter (thus higher air velocity) intake. Increasing the size of the intake has the same volume of air moving much slower - less effective at lower RPMs. Just compare a 360 magnum head to a 360 head - the magnum makes more torque sooner than the 360 - and the ports are noticeably different!

If you have a 1/2 pipe supply a faucet with a 3/4 inch hose attached - would you get more flow by hooking a 1" hose to it? NO - same gallon per hour, as the faucet (just like the compression ratio, cam profile/timing, port shape and volume) is the limiting factor.
In other words....NO!

2008 2-dr Rubicon, auto,
RK 2.5" Max Travel, Rancho 9000XL shocks, 37" Nittos, 5.38's, RR skids, Warn VR8000-S.
RIPP Gen 2 Stg 2 Supercharger.
Political Correctness offends me.
HappyTrails is offline  
post #5 of 5 Old 07-26-2014, 05:54 AM
HAFICON
Registered User
2012 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Buzzards Bay
Posts: 776
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTrails View Post
In other words....NO!
Exactly.. *L* However there is nothing wrong with ditching the oversized stock muffler for something smaller and adding a snorkel.

315/70/17 Duratrac on MB Wheels
AEV 2.5 with M.O.R.E 1" body lift
Viair 450c, ARB Air lockers,
4.88's and TNT truss.
My build thus far.
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f22/b...tures-1509366/
HAFICON is offline  
Reply

Tags
exhaust , intake , mods

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome