Looking to buy. 07 vs 08? - Page 3 - JeepForum.com

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 34 Old 09-24-2013, 11:07 AM
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mildenhall United Kingdom
Posts: 1,930
Originally Posted by zjilla View Post

This was in missouri(america) in december 2011. This is what i was told and tried to be sold by the service department@Leesummit chysler.
If i was lied too..then im glad i didnt bite at it. Anyway...back to the OPs ???'s
Sent from my GT-N7000 using JeepForum
Sorry i was refering to tge max care plan. I didnt use the right verbage and cause confusion. http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f96/c...ience-1267979/

Sent from my GT-N7000 using JeepForum

2007 Unlimited Sahara
98 ZJ Limited RHD (British spec)
USAF Military Working Dog Handler
October 2013 JK of the month
My Slowly but surely JK build thread:
zjilla is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #32 of 34 Old 09-24-2013, 11:31 AM
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 2,027
Originally Posted by JTPhoto View Post
I agree.. I have only heard of a couple of cases of spun bearings in over 6 years and those were a byproduct of abuse and hydrolock. ASAMOF it seems now that the 3.8 has a better track record for less major engine issues then the 3.6.
Personally I am content with my lowly 3.8...
The technology in the Pentastar engine is cool, but I think for a Jeep, a low tech pushrod engine is better. Would prefer if they had a throttle cable.

2000 XJ - 3.5'' Lift & Skinny Mudders.
Previous: A CJ, Few TJs and JK.
Millermagic is offline  
post #33 of 34 Old 09-24-2013, 11:43 AM
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,188
Don't forget Mm, the AEV Procal Module will also make the JK/JKU throttle controllable by the light stalk "dimmer ring"-for ten minutes--

Originally Posted by Millermagic View Post
The technology in the Pentastar engine is cool, but I think for a Jeep, a low tech pushrod engine is better. Would prefer if they had a throttle cable.
However thats only while the jeep is stationary, but it's also modifiable-

With the decrease in sensitivity of the throttle in 4lo, there really is no reason for a throttle cable !


Yellow Jeep No. 683
JIMBOX is offline  
post #34 of 34 Old 09-25-2013, 09:42 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Simpsonville
Posts: 26
Wow. Thanks for all the feedback. But I'm probably going to be picking up a 05 tomorrow instead of a JK. Came across a deal too good to pass up.
scotp71 is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome