call me old school - Page 3 - JeepForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 48 Old 05-17-2006, 08:25 PM
ODAMO
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 103
Maybe what they should have done is never built the Commander and named the 4 door Wrangler the Commander. I think Jeep is headed towards having too many models that do nothing but overlap each other. When the Unlimited comes out I don't see that many Commanders being sold. With it's lack of off road ability you might as well get the Grand, it's more refined. The Cherokee was offered in 2 or 4 doors so why not the wrangler. Ford attempted to correct their mistake of doing a second attempt at a small bronco with the bronco II.... too bad it was no match for the original, in looks or performance.

ODAMO is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 48 Old 05-17-2006, 11:28 PM
Karamba
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieatchickens
Why make the wrangler something its not?
Pardon me for repeating myslef in a second thread: what other 4dr convertible would you suggest people should buy instead?

You short WB Wrangler is still there.
Karamba is offline  
post #33 of 48 Old 05-17-2006, 11:31 PM
Karamba
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bgeddes
Screw that I want a 4:1 transfer, D44s, 5 sp and a CRD.
With electric drive you do not need 4:1. All the torque at 0 rpm. And computers can control your wheel rotation with any precision you want. And it will be stronger and more reliable.

(Oh, well, guess I like new doodads, even at my age..)
Karamba is offline  
post #34 of 48 Old 05-18-2006, 05:59 AM
xj-boonie
Registered User
 
xj-boonie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Frederick
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieatchickens
I guarantee they would have sold more if the would have offered the full size 78' style AND the 77' short wheelbased Bronco. The Bronco was Ford's only sport ute.

If you want extra size in Jeep you can always go Liberty, Grand Cherokee or even a Commander. Why make the wrangler something its not?
I don't think it's quite an even comparison: full sized bronco vs swb bronco to TJ vs JK...

1996 XJ Sport, 3" OME lift, 31" BFG AT's, Tom Woods SYE & DS, Amsoil flat filter, Amsoil fluids, Kolak ignition & exhaust, Hidden Hitch hitch, IPF e-codes & Magic-J bulbs, T-case & Gas tank skids, AJ's super rails, C-rok brace, JKS disco's, ARB Bull Bar w/ Warn M8000.

1979 CJ5, 258 I6, T18a, glass tub/fenders/hood, 4" BDS lift, 33" BFG MT's
xj-boonie is offline  
post #35 of 48 Old 05-18-2006, 07:21 AM
ieatchickens
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by xj-boonie
I don't think it's quite an even comparison: full sized bronco vs swb bronco to TJ vs JK...
Not yet. Wait until the next generation Wrangler comes out. "We made the all new '17 Wrangler the best Wrangler yet! It's bigger and has more capablities!"-Jeep

The idea of the original Jeep is a small 1/4 offroad vehicle. Jeep is getting away from Wranglers unique presence in the 4wd market.

98' SE, Chili Pepper Red, grizzly wheels, 126AA/103AA to 129AA/105AA coil swap, 3/4" spacer, 31 Yoko Geolander AT, soft top, rear view mirror turned upside down, door straps twisted, rubicon wipers, optional factory rear sway bar, doors & top on.
Low Output 4 Cylinder Jeep Club Member #1
06' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
99' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
ieatchickens is offline  
post #36 of 48 Old 05-18-2006, 07:26 AM
ieatchickens
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karamba
Pardon me for repeating myslef in a second thread: what other 4dr convertible would you suggest people should buy instead?

You short WB Wrangler is still there.
I guess we see the Wrangler differently. I see it primarily as a capable 4wd vehicle first that happens to be a convertible. You see it as a convertible that happens to be a 4wd.

Based on your point of view, specialty vehicles like Porche, Corvette, Miata, Soltice, etc should all be making 4 door convertibles. I mean, what other 4 door convertibles are out there?

Why does Jeep have to use its brand icon to be the first in a market that automakers have always ignored?

98' SE, Chili Pepper Red, grizzly wheels, 126AA/103AA to 129AA/105AA coil swap, 3/4" spacer, 31 Yoko Geolander AT, soft top, rear view mirror turned upside down, door straps twisted, rubicon wipers, optional factory rear sway bar, doors & top on.
Low Output 4 Cylinder Jeep Club Member #1
06' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
99' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
ieatchickens is offline  
post #37 of 48 Old 05-18-2006, 08:57 AM
Rommel
Registered User
 
Rommel's Avatar
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Jersey City
Posts: 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeepinYahoo
I'm with you dude, I dont have plastic bumpers either, these guys are nuts.

There were plastic endcaps on your front and rear bumpers if you had a TJ. They are notoriously weak and crumple on any kind of impact. Personally I hated them and took them off.

Just to note, the plastic on the bumpers is an OVERLAY. Underneath the plastic it looks like the bumpers are almost identical to the current TJ "beams". The plastic is much harder and seems like it would stand up to casual impacts much better than the TJ endcaps.

Besides, any Jeeper worth their salt replaces their bumpers anyway.

-Romm

"A dreamy horse! This is my 4th jeep since I first drive 12 years ago. I just drive jeep, always..." - Red Bull China
Rommel is offline  
post #38 of 48 Old 05-18-2006, 11:51 AM
Karamba
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieatchickens
I mean, what other 4 door convertibles are out there?
None. That's why I am glad that the new JK comes out. That - and it will take me to some remote spots in Sierra Nevada. unlike our 330CiC. I am not even sure I will upgrade the new Rubicon after I get it. It should make it as is.

I used to own a Wrangler. Nice car - not practical for me anymore.
Karamba is offline  
post #39 of 48 Old 05-19-2006, 10:30 PM
ieatchickens
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Bismarck, ND
Posts: 845
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karamba
None. That's why I am glad that the new JK comes out. That - and it will take me to some remote spots in Sierra Nevada. unlike our 330CiC. I am not even sure I will upgrade the new Rubicon after I get it. It should make it as is.

I used to own a Wrangler. Nice car - not practical for me anymore.
The 2wd will get you there?

I am not arguing the point of someone making a 4 door convertible, I just don't want it to be the Wrangler.

98' SE, Chili Pepper Red, grizzly wheels, 126AA/103AA to 129AA/105AA coil swap, 3/4" spacer, 31 Yoko Geolander AT, soft top, rear view mirror turned upside down, door straps twisted, rubicon wipers, optional factory rear sway bar, doors & top on.
Low Output 4 Cylinder Jeep Club Member #1
06' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
99' Grand Cherokee Limited, 4.7 liter V8
ieatchickens is offline  
post #40 of 48 Old 05-19-2006, 10:39 PM
Karamba
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: California
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieatchickens
The 2wd will get you there?
Quote myself: "the new Rubicon". I am glad I would not need to compromise utility for fun.

2wd will not get me there - I have argued that it still has a lot of utility for a lot of people.

So, your point is that you are against overloading the "Wrangler" designation and design.

But why would DC design a brand new platform when they have a really good one for such a vehicle?

Maybe its just the name? But it would be odd if a car that is exactly the same, but for a 20 inch stretch, would require a completely new brand.

Just let's call it "Unlimited". Not a bad designation.
Karamba is offline  
post #41 of 48 Old 05-20-2006, 10:06 PM
MT3Geiger
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cincinnati/NKY
Posts: 472
Quote:
Originally Posted by ieatchickens
Why does Jeep have to use its brand icon to be the first in a market that automakers have always ignored?
I agree with this and I have to say that i'm pretty upset with the decision to make a 2wd version of the Wrangler.

I can understand the selling point for the new 4 door convertible and realize there is certainly a market for it, I cannot however understand the desire to dilute (read: castrate) a vehicle that has the history and clout that the Jeep does with Wrangler, CJ or otherwise with a 2wd.

Sure they will probably sell a couple more units but doesn't that alienate the image that caused most of us to buy our Jeeps in the first place?

I know its a futile rant from someone stuck in his ways but don't we have enough of these vehicles already.

Whats next? A 4 cylinder Vette, all the presence but more MPG? The argument for it could be that the large majority of owners don't race them and therefore are able to get by without the added power. Heck, its even more "practical" with fuel prices being so high.


2005 Silver Rubicon, 6 speed, Dual Tops + bikini,

2" BB, 1" BL, 33x12.5x16 Boggers, Cobra 75, KC 130W slimlights, OR Fab Rock Doors, and some poison spyder diff guards
MT3Geiger is offline  
post #42 of 48 Old 05-20-2006, 10:37 PM
Reswob
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by ODAMO
Maybe what they should have done is never built the Commander and named the 4 door Wrangler the Commander. I think Jeep is headed towards having too many models that do nothing but overlap each other. When the Unlimited comes out I don't see that many Commanders being sold. With it's lack of off road ability you might as well get the Grand, it's more refined. The Cherokee was offered in 2 or 4 doors so why not the wrangler. Ford attempted to correct their mistake of doing a second attempt at a small bronco with the bronco II.... too bad it was no match for the original, in looks or performance.
How do you see any correlation between the 4-dr Wrangler and the Commander?? People who want a large, 7-passenger, luxury SUV would buy a Commander, as opposed to people who want a Wrangler, who will buy Wranglers. They're nothing alike. The only Jeep models that 'overlap' would be the WK and XK - both large luxury-oriented SUVs intended for on-road driving (not that what people do with them is allways what Jeep intended them to do ).

'11 WK2 Limited 5.7
Looking for a WK2 full size spare tire and 18" rims
Reswob is offline  
post #43 of 48 Old 05-22-2006, 06:57 AM
keithert
Registered User
 
keithert's Avatar
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 2,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by MT3Geiger
Whats next? A 4 cylinder Vette, all the presence but more MPG? The argument for it could be that the large majority of owners don't race them and therefore are able to get by without the added power. Heck, its even more "practical" with fuel prices being so high.
Seen the pics of the new Saturn Sky?
keithert is offline  
post #44 of 48 Old 06-03-2006, 11:12 AM
dwales31
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: MAss
Posts: 84
not a jeep

i hate the new wrangler its not a jeep.....2wd? plastic bumpers? 4 door? its too big to fit down most trails in my area
dwales31 is offline  
post #45 of 48 Old 06-03-2006, 06:59 PM
Sk[pperB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Fairburn ga
Posts: 45
I have seen CJ, TJ, and Cherokees that were 2wd also

Skipperb
02 Liberty, 2.5 Daystar, 265x75x16
05 Unlimited 2" BB - 33x12.50x15 - 9.5W
Sk[pperB is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
What do you call this? KC1337 YJ Wrangler Technical Forum 1 04-19-2009 06:17 PM
OK.... should I call BS here? Weelspin TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 6 11-16-2008 10:37 AM
CPU or ECM not sure what to call it bigredcherokee YJ Wrangler Technical Forum 4 09-07-2008 09:30 PM
Call bs or what ever you want but Nonya TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 38 05-05-2008 12:01 PM
Help! What Do You Call It? RenoosRemoob JK Wrangler Technical Forum 11 09-08-2007 08:56 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome