But will it be - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 03:05 PM Thread Starter
joebob
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 11
But will it be

serviceable? One of the things I have always loved about the wrangler (CJ on up to today’s TJ) is I can do 95% of any of the mechanical maintenance and repair ever needed. Any insight on the “serviceability” of the new JK?

joebob is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 03:29 PM
AOPAPilot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 172
while some things might require a bit of learning about, I dont see it being THAT much different. Afterall, it is still a Wrangler.
AOPAPilot is offline  
post #3 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 04:30 PM
ISurvivedNMU
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 800
Of course we can only give educated guess's now. But i dont think its going to be as simple as the TJ. This thing will have traction control and roll mitigation. I would think it would be almost like working on a grand cherokee.

But I am sure it will be much better than working on a 06 Ford F250 with a 6.0 diesel...LOL...

2006 Jeep TJ Rubicon... Currie 4" Lift, ect...
2011 Grand Cherokee Overland
2015 JKU Hard Rock
ISurvivedNMU is offline  
post #4 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 04:35 PM
TurtleMacLeod
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 410
Well, the engine is a carry-over from the minivans of the last couple of years, and the axles, transmissions, and transfer cases are all carry-overs from the current TJ, so I would assume that that stuff will be just as serviceable. The only things that would muck it up are all the sensors for the new gadgets.
TurtleMacLeod is offline  
post #5 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 05:16 PM
ISurvivedNMU
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 800
I heard the axles were different and the old skids and stuff would not work on the new jk. I always thought a dana 44 was a dana 44?

2006 Jeep TJ Rubicon... Currie 4" Lift, ect...
2011 Grand Cherokee Overland
2015 JKU Hard Rock
ISurvivedNMU is offline  
post #6 of 9 Old 06-21-2006, 05:27 PM
scottyc
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 77007, TX
Posts: 865
Yeah, from what I've read, the axles are beefier. (Dana is considering calling it a 45?) Something to do with more or bigger splines? I know zero about axles, but I definitely read something like that on one of the boards.
scottyc is offline  
post #7 of 9 Old 06-22-2006, 06:51 AM
ghostship
Registered User
1978 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 178
2007 Jeep Wrangler Chief Engineer Jim Issner has responded to email questions:

6. "I didn't want to paraphrase this next question, it comes from one of our readers with the nickname, 'disturbed': "The number 1 question I have is WHY OH WHY DID YOU GUYS STICK A D35 UNDER THIS THING? "

This is THE most hated Jeep/Dana axle assembly ever produced and to continue to use it under the entirely new JK platform (even with upgrades) is mind-boggling. The D44 or AAM equivalent should have been used across the board for all JKs."




""The Dana 30 front axles have a high pinion design (TJ was a low pinion design) to provide greater gear strength, the housing is stiffer and stronger, and the pinion bearings are larger for improved durability.The Dana 35 rear axle also has a larger pinion and unitized wheel bearings. The prior design had an on-shaft bearing. The axle shafts have also increased in cross section for improved strength. Overall, the axles have been improved over its predecessor. In fact, we are considering different names for the axles since they are virtually all new""




A Jeep spokesman was also quoted as saying that the Dana44's were so much bigger that they considered renaming them Dana45's. I'll try to find that to post, too.
ghostship is offline  
post #8 of 9 Old 06-22-2006, 08:11 AM
scottyc
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: 77007, TX
Posts: 865
Yeah, what he said.

And welcome, ghostship. If your G-wagen nemesis shows up over here, please ignore him! JeepForum is my way of getting away from that silliness.
scottyc is offline  
post #9 of 9 Old 06-22-2006, 08:20 AM
pbrutsch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 351
Quote:
Originally Posted by TurtleMacLeod
Well, the engine is a carry-over from the minivans of the last couple of years
The 3.8L has been around longer than that... it's been in minivans for over a decade... it's 3.3L little brother is even older.

Real Jeeps don't need no stinkin' spark plugs!
pbrutsch is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome