 |
|
|
10-12-2009, 10:48 PM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ruskin, Fl
Posts: 1,911
|
It would work well in the mud pits down here in FL.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 10:51 PM
|
#17
|
|
Best taken in small doses
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: jonesboro, AR
Posts: 3,963
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcg311TJ
It would work well in the mud pits down here in FL.
|
Not when you over-revved.
__________________
Miss Amy's sensibilities and the language filter prevent me from telling you what I really think about you.
|
|
|
10-12-2009, 11:31 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Alameda, CA
Posts: 111
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchintheTrail
i still would not know why you would want to spray any engine. the benifits in this matter dont out weigh the risks imho
|
because it is cheap. I ran an edelbrock nitrous kit on my 78 Malibu for a lot of passes, no problems. Like everything else it is all about doing your research. If you set everything up properly it is not that risky.
Have I ever considered putting a kit on the Jeep? No. I have yet to be in a situation where I instantly needed that much more power for a small amount of time. Oh yeah and the Malibu had all forged internals and a cam with the exhaust opened a bit extra for the nitrous, the Jeep does not..
edit, just reread, I completely agree with the last part, the benifits in this matter dont out weigh the risk... I agree 100%.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 06:49 AM
|
#19
|
|
Web Wheeler
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quail Valley, California
Posts: 22,835
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JoshG
because it is cheap. I ran an edelbrock nitrous kit on my 78 Malibu for a lot of passes, no problems. Like everything else it is all about doing your research. If you set everything up properly it is not that risky.
Have I ever considered putting a kit on the Jeep? No. I have yet to be in a situation where I instantly needed that much more power for a small amount of time. Oh yeah and the Malibu had all forged internals and a cam with the exhaust opened a bit extra for the nitrous, the Jeep does not..
edit, just reread, I completely agree with the last part, the benifits in this matter dont out weigh the risk... I agree 100%.
|
Oh I don't know that I agree that the risk outweighs the benefits. I know of lots of situations where another 50 hp would be nice in an instant and I also know of several folks that have done it with no ill effects.
If I played in the sand more, I'd certainly have a well set up Nitrous system spraying a wet 50 shot.
__________________
I am Savvy
blackmagicbrakes.com
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 09:04 AM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: IT
Posts: 224
|
Smoking joe
-run a "window switch" which opens only at set RPM level.
-run another switch below the pedal which is beside your "on-off" switch to turn on only when you mash the pedal.
-This is just nice, use a switched bottle valve(so you can open/close the bottle with a switch near your dash)
Haven't really researched any kits for the jeep but a wet kit would be best because it adds extra fuel in with the NOS.
Don't go over 125HP keep it "safer" using under 100HP shot. 50HP sounds great.
...and let me know if you do this.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 09:28 AM
|
#21
|
|
Web Wheeler
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by van1
Smoking joe
-run a "window switch" which opens only at set RPM level.
-run another switch below the pedal which is beside your "on-off" switch to turn on only when you mash the pedal.
-This is just nice, use a switched bottle valve(so you can open/close the bottle with a switch near your dash)
|
Yup. To run nitrous safely you need a window switch (rpm range), WOT switch, and a wideband to make sure the AFR is correct (if not you can rejet). I would think a 75 shot would be fine on the stock tune as long as you run 91+ octane. A bottle heater would not be a bad idea either. Does anybody know if the intake manifold is the same design that they used with carbs? Sometimes there are issues with homogeneous distributions when flowing fuel on an intake designed for air.
Check this out! Not running a window switch and low rpm nitrous activation is the quickest way to blow a hole in your intake.
[YT]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/-1cPuJza_Aw&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/-1cPuJza_Aw&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YT]
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 09:32 AM
|
#22
|
|
Straight up fool!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: 'Round Here, Florida
Posts: 5,544
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by van1
Smoking joe
-run a "window switch" which opens only at set RPM level.
-run another switch below the pedal which is beside your "on-off" switch to turn on only when you mash the pedal.
-This is just nice, use a switched bottle valve(so you can open/close the bottle with a switch near your dash)
Haven't really researched any kits for the jeep but a wet kit would be best because it adds extra fuel in with the NOS.
Don't go over 125HP keep it "safer" using under 100HP shot. 50HP sounds great.
...and let me know if you do this.
|
I'm doubting you'll get a response from the OP, seeing as how he started this thread in 2001..
__________________
My RHD TJ - Savvy equipped... And loving it! - Durty Rok Carolina Offroad
I drive on the right side, what's wrong with you?
Quote:
|
Be very careful with the wife mod. Uninstallation can be extremely expensive. Wife mods have been known to take the Jeep and all other mods during the uninstall process. Also, make sure you service your wife mod properly as often as humanly possible. Wife mods not properly serviced may malfunction or uninstall themselves at any time.
|
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 09:43 AM
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: An Ambulance Near You!
Posts: 1,271
|
I would love to see someone do this. Just once atleast ya know.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:01 AM
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,225
|
I live my life a quarter mile at a time. hah.. sorry.
__________________
Finally paid off...
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:09 AM
|
#25
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: , Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 752
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchintheTrail
Holy batman and robin time for a thread resurrection!!! anybody do this yet =) haha
|
Why would you even bother bringing this back, it is 8 years old. 
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:20 AM
|
#26
|
|
Read tech links in my sig
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgorm
Yup. To run nitrous safely you need a window switch (rpm range), WOT switch, and a wideband to make sure the AFR is correct (if not you can rejet). I would think a 75 shot would be fine on the stock tune as long as you run 91+ octane. A bottle heater would not be a bad idea either. Does anybody know if the intake manifold is the same design that they used with carbs? Sometimes there are issues with homogeneous distributions when flowing fuel on an intake designed for air.
Check this out! Not running a window switch and low rpm nitrous activation is the quickest way to blow a hole in your intake.
|
the intake manifold is a different design than the old carb'ed version. but no worries, you could actually put a throttle body spacer to good use by drilling and tapping the sides for the fuel and nitrous jet sizes you want. run a seperate fuel pump with your switches and you're golden. would still need the wideband O2 sensor, and might be a good idea to dyno tune with a piggyback to ensure a happy A/F ratio and prevent engine destruction, but you could probably get close with a FMU.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:30 AM
|
#27
|
|
Web Wheeler
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 2,355
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unlimited04
the intake manifold is a different design than the old carb'ed version. but no worries, you could actually put a throttle body spacer to good use by drilling and tapping the sides for the fuel and nitrous jet sizes you want. run a seperate fuel pump with your switches and you're golden. would still need the wideband O2 sensor, and might be a good idea to dyno tune with a piggyback to ensure a happy A/F ratio and prevent engine destruction, but you could probably get close with a FMU.
|
The problem is that many air intakes are designed with longer runners and sometimes have places where fuel can pool. Sharp bends are also more common and can cause fuel to drop out of the air stream. You shouldn't need a fmu if you run a wet shot, only for a dry shot, and even then with no boost it would be tricky to setup properly. You may need a bigger fuel pump.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:34 AM
|
#28
|
|
Read tech links in my sig
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 21,806
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by jgorm
The problem is that many air intakes are designed with longer runners and sometimes have places where fuel can pool. Sharp bends are also more common and can cause fuel to drop out of the air stream. You shouldn't need a fmu if you run a wet shot, only for a dry shot, and even then with no boost it would be tricky to setup properly. You may need a bigger fuel pump.
|
yea, the older 91-99 (??) intake manifolds were long runner styles. the 00-06+ 4.0L's are more of an open single-ish plane manifold, which makes more power, hence Jeep changed the design  I haven't stuck a scope in one, but it looks like a much better design for nitrous vs the older style. I'd still want a piggyback or something to verify A/F ratio, and allow the computer to compensate should the extra fuel pump become an issue.
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 11:36 AM
|
#29
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Death Star
Posts: 565
|
How to install and use Nitrous Oxide, written by Joe Pettitt, Car Tech Books, Part no: SA50 ISBN: 1-884089-22-4
Maybe a kind of old fashioned book. But the mechanical rules are still valid.
Read and then decide by yourself and be on the safe side.
Any discussion is worthless without details and knowledge.
__________________
Go hard, go Diesel! - Turbocooled and Intercharged...
|
|
|
10-13-2009, 01:47 PM
|
#30
|
|
Web Wheeler
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quail Valley, California
Posts: 22,835
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unlimited04
yea, the older 91-99 (??) intake manifolds were long runner styles. the 00-06+ 4.0L's are more of an open single-ish plane manifold, which makes more power, hence Jeep changed the design  I haven't stuck a scope in one, but it looks like a much better design for nitrous vs the older style. I'd still want a piggyback or something to verify A/F ratio, and allow the computer to compensate should the extra fuel pump become an issue.
|
The fuel pump is typically a non issue on wet injections with fuel injected motors. 2 things, the fuel jet is much smaller than the Nitrous jet and the fuel is typically tapped into at the fuel rail which has more than ample flow for the small amount of fuel needed.
__________________
I am Savvy
blackmagicbrakes.com
|
|
|
|
|