|
 |
|
|
|
04-14-2007, 04:43 AM
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
Mickey Thompson Classic II's
am I the only one that thinks the 17" looks much better?
17 inch  15 inch  on the 17" the holes are a lot bigger, unless I am seeing things, now how many of you run 17"s? I don't really want to but the rims just look so much better 
__________________
[SIZE="3"][FONT="Impact"][COLOR="Cyan"]ABC - A/Ox4 - SAMPLE - OPQRST[/COLOR][/FONT][/SIZE] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
04-14-2007, 07:14 AM
|
#2 |
|
Geaux Tigers!!!
 
2001 TJ Wrangler
|
Personally, I think the holes on the 17" MTII's are too large. Makes it look non-proportional to me, especially on a smaller size vehicle. I dig those 15s with the black beedlock, though.
__________________
2001 Wrangler Sport - 4.5" homemade long arm lift, 1" body lift, 4.56s, 35" MTR Kevlars, 15x8 Pro Comp alloys, D30/Lock Right/alloys, D44/Detroit My Jeep Build Journal Long Arm Suspension Build |
|
|
|
|
04-14-2007, 09:27 AM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler
|
If you like the look of larger holes, you should check out the Procomp 1069. I think they're slightly larger.
I've had my rims for less that a year and now I really wish I would have gotten beadlocks. Or at least a street lock. Mine are all rashed up. Oh well, I'll trash them for the next couple of years and then move on  |
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
| Suggested Threads |
|
 |
|
|
Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.
|
