LJ Clayton Pro series long arm kit....... - JeepForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 02:07 PM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
LJ Clayton Pro series long arm kit.......

Looking at picking up this kit: http://claytonoffroad.com/product_in...roducts_id/356

I like the idea of a 3 link up front, with a triangulated 4 link in the rear that eliminates the rear trackbar. Uses all 2.5" JJ(which I would not use in favor of the Metal Cloak Duraflex joints which will swap right in)housings allowing me to use duroflex joints instead.

I know alot of people here don't like the long arm kits with the TJ's, but with the LJ platform, seems like this might be a favorable setup in a number of ways for my needs and a better performing setup vs. the available short arm setups.

I know the big issue with TJ's is getting hung up on the arms on the breakover, but on the LJ's it does not seem like that would be as much of an issue. Even with a 5.5" LA setup, the Clayton control arms themselves seem like that are still tucked closer to the frame than the stock control arms and specifically those large honking frame side mounts they go into both front and rear.

Any thoughs and experiences from LJ owners with this kit or a similiar LA setup?

GMBNT42 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 03:21 PM
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 20,287
I'm confused as to why you think the under-frame footprint is improved with an LJ over a TJ.

OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline  
post #3 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 03:43 PM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
I'm confused as to why you think the under-frame footprint is improved with an LJ over a TJ.
Under frame footprint? Im talking about overall stability of the LJ vs. the TJ. Long arms seem to significantly hurt breakover angle on the TJ, but on the LJ seems like really a non issue with no real negative effects.
GMBNT42 is offline  
post #4 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 03:57 PM
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 20,287
Breakover = under frame footprint. If anything, the problem is worsened with an LJ due to the longer wheelbase and larger distance between the skid plate and rear axle.

Where does stability even enter that discussion?

This should help explain footprint:

Large footprint--lots to get caught up on


Small footprint--minimal junk to get caught up on

OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline  
post #5 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 04:09 PM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
Breakover = under frame footprint. If anything, the problem is worsened with an LJ due to the longer wheelbase and larger distance between the skid plate and rear axle.

Where does stability even enter that discussion?

This should help explain footprint:

Large footprint--lots to get caught up on


Small footprint--minimal junk to get caught up on
That is not a Clayton LA kit though.......
GMBNT42 is offline  
post #6 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 07:34 PM
dreed
Registered User
2004 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 339
Are you lifting your Jeep now? This would be a bad idea if your going to keep it low.
dreed is offline  
post #7 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 07:43 PM
Jankoid
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Albemarle
Posts: 4,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
Breakover = under frame footprint. If anything, the problem is worsened with an LJ due to the longer wheelbase and larger distance between the skid plate and rear axle.
The Clayton kit uses the same arms regardless of it being a TJ or LJ. On an LJ the mounts are just further back on the frame. They don't attach to the skid like RE. Other than that, I'm staying out of this debate.
Jankoid is offline  
post #8 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 07:51 PM
williambmac
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Roxbury, N.J.
Posts: 451
I have a Clayton kit in my LJ and I love it.
Not to start a pissing match with the LA vs. SA,
I have had both and the LA rides much nicer on the street for a dd.

2000 TJ 5.5 Long arm, lots of extras. R.I.P.
2005 LJ rubi 35's Clayton, lots of extras
williambmac is offline  
post #9 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 08:34 PM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jankoid View Post
The Clayton kit uses the same arms regardless of it being a TJ or LJ. On an LJ the mounts are just further back on the frame. They don't attach to the skid like RE. Other than that, I'm staying out of this debate.
From what I understand the LJ long arm kits are slightly different in the rear vs. the TJ other than just where they mount to the frame. Or at least that is what CLayton mfg. told me.
GMBNT42 is offline  
post #10 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 08:35 PM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by williambmac View Post
I have a Clayton kit in my LJ and I love it.
Not to start a pissing match with the LA vs. SA,
I have had both and the LA rides much nicer on the street for a dd.
Yep, I had a chance to ride in an LJ today with the standard 4" long arm lift kit, and I was actually really impressed with the on road ride quality. REALLY IMPRESSED.
GMBNT42 is offline  
post #11 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 08:43 PM
spyder6
Got that Toyota chit
 
spyder6's Avatar
2010  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 12,042
you do realize that the TJ and LJ are identical in every way, except for 10" of extra frame rail, right?

2010 Magnetic Toyota 4Runner Trail Teams

My builds: Bruiser and The Grey

|Forge Overland| or follow us on Facebook
spyder6 is offline  
post #12 of 65 Old 09-28-2012, 10:52 PM
wushaw
Rockin jeep
 
wushaw's Avatar
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,165
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMBNT42 View Post
From what I understand the LJ long arm kits are slightly different in the rear vs. the TJ other than just where they mount to the frame. Or at least that is what CLayton mfg. told me.
Yea they are slightly different due to the WB. I am running a Clayton LA with 5" stretch.....I love it. Yea I have run a ground (rock) on one of the lower control arm mounts....once so far. I still hang up on my diffs regularly...just like everybody else.

It's a quality kit.....I know everybody thinks it's a bolt on.....well the control arms are after you cut the OEM brackets off & weld on the Clayton control arm brackets, truss and if you got the high clearance brackets for the axle & whatever else you plan on doing to it.

It's really no different than if you built your own brackets.....your still doing the same work. Only difference is Clayton gives you a print to follow & parts to install.
wushaw is offline  
post #13 of 65 Old 09-29-2012, 12:42 AM
_KONG_
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eastvale
Posts: 1,465
Just repeat the opposite of everything you just said and your statements will make sense. Did you just skip over the part that says "Recommended lift height range 5.5" to 8" of lift."?
_KONG_ is offline  
post #14 of 65 Old 09-29-2012, 05:52 AM
williambmac
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Roxbury, N.J.
Posts: 451
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMBNT42
From what I understand the LJ long arm kits are slightly different in the rear vs. the TJ other than just where they mount to the frame. Or at least that is what CLayton mfg. told me.
The only difference is the rear frame brackets.

2000 TJ 5.5 Long arm, lots of extras. R.I.P.
2005 LJ rubi 35's Clayton, lots of extras
williambmac is offline  
post #15 of 65 Old 09-29-2012, 06:38 AM Thread Starter
GMBNT42
Web Wheeler
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Nashua
Posts: 2,384
Quote:
Originally Posted by williambmac View Post
The only difference is the rear frame brackets.
I could have sworn that when talking to Clayton they said that the rear control arms are slightly different in length too.........not 100% sure though.....Ill double check on Monday.
GMBNT42 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Clayton Long Arm Kit IH8ROADZ TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 6 04-05-2011 05:21 AM
Clayton Long Arm upgrade ???? 00CHRIS TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 1 10-18-2009 07:28 PM
clayton long arm spyder6 TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 57 07-28-2009 11:58 PM
clayton long arm vs Rubicon Express long arm Squeeky TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 5 01-09-2008 09:16 PM
Clayton Long Arm kit 92blazn TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 33 01-11-2006 05:28 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome