Quantcast Is the K&N FIPK worth it? - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles

Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > TJ Wrangler Technical Forum > Is the K&N FIPK worth it?

JKS products - Free shipping! Lowest prices!East Coast Gear Supply- Quality Diff PartsJeep CJ, YJ, and TJ build your own bumper packages.

Reply
Old 06-23-2007, 04:18 PM   #16
GroundAssault
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 497
if your spending that money then save a little more and get a snorkel!!

__________________
2006 Jeep Wrangler---SOLD!

Nowhere at present is there such a measureless loathing of their country by educated people as in America. --Eric Hoffer

Quote:
Originally Posted by rmb2485
cheap mods are like a drug dealer giving you your first few for free...they will only get you addicted and before you know it every paycheck goes into your new habit :rofl:
GroundAssault is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 08:48 PM   #17
702Jeep
Registered User
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3
Quote:
Originally Posted by tjwoo
Yeah, save your money. If you combine CAIs, chip, and other performance parts together, you're bound to get some gains but definetely not worth the money. You're in LV where Im guessing it's pretty dusty. K&NFIPK has a crappier filteration rate than the stock ones, so unless you're okay with more dust getting into your motor, I wouldn't do it.

What people do for performance gains is regear.

Wish I could but I dont have the money to do so. I'm not enough of a mechanic to trust myself with the transmission of my jeep. would love to go to 4.11 but cant seem to find the cash.
702Jeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 09:47 PM   #18
SecondTJ
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 5,243
I had a K&N FIPK.

After 6 months i took it off and sold it. It didn't help anything, and was a waste of money. Performance did nothing, and it hurt my mpg.
__________________
'00 Sport. 5-speed, Detroit TrueTrac Dana 44 rear, Detroit TrueTrac front, 4.10's, 2" RE BB, OME shocks, 31" BFG MT, JKS Quicker Disco's, Borla, Chicago Electric 10k winch

'99 Z28 M6, some goodies
'94 'Vette, A4 all stock
SecondTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2007, 11:04 PM   #19
dspgajeep
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford
Not only is the K&N FIPK (or TB spacer) not worth it, realize too that a K&N filter is probably the worst at filtration you could possibly choose. Tests show just how bad at filtration it is. In one ISO test, a K&N air filter passed 18X the amount of dirt an AC-Delco paper air filter did.

I didn't think K&N filters were that bad. In the past I used them in my family cars becuase of modest horsepower gains due to lower airflow restrections. I put one in my jeep becuase it was shown to have the highest dust capacity.

Here is a link to the Jeep Magazine Article that I read before I bought the K&N filter. It definately isn't as efficient at stoping the dirt, but it does have the highest capacity.

http://www.jpmagazine.com/shop4parts/154_0611_jeep_air_filter_upgrades/test_results.html
__________________
New, but opinionated.

2003 Rubicon
Warn M8000, Tuffy Bolt Locks, Best top Soft Top, OEM Hard Top, Warn Tow Hooks, Class III Hidden Hitch, Scanegauge II, Cobra CB 40x with Firestik II antenna, Sirius Radio, Topfive Rack (avoid), All J 2x3 Rubicon Boulderbars, and HF Cargo Carrier.
dspgajeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 05:55 AM   #20
tjthorson
Senior Member
 
tjthorson's Avatar
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 974
I used to be a BIG K&N fan as well. Some dust in the intake tract of my old Turbo Regal was enough to freak me out about it - I used to clean and oil that thing monthlyafter I saw that, as options are limited and the stock airbox on THOSE cars is not real good.

Ask yourself this - MAYBE the reason the K&N is so good at capacity is because its letting a lot of the small stuff through! Those tests seem to talk about efficiency - but what size dust did they use? (How fine?) The interesting part is how much dirt they can handle before clogging. I bet your dust capactiy goes WAY up (for a while ) if you just took the air filter off completely!

Its the small stuff that clogs up the filter. Picture a piece of pipe - fill it with bog rocks, and then fill it with sand. How much air is going to flow through that pipe?

Now picture the same pipe with just the rocks, but the sand can flow through. How's the capacity now???

Stick with the stock stuff - its a Jeep. Work on lifts, tires, gears....

Quote:
Originally Posted by dspgajeep
I didn't think K&N filters were that bad. In the past I used them in my family cars becuase of modest horsepower gains due to lower airflow restrections. I put one in my jeep becuase it was shown to have the highest dust capacity.

Here is a link to the Jeep Magazine Article that I read before I bought the K&N filter. It definately isn't as efficient at stoping the dirt, but it does have the highest capacity.

http://www.jpmagazine.com/shop4parts/154_0611_jeep_air_filter_upgrades/test_results.html
__________________
Todd Thorson
2005 Yellow Unlimited Rubicon 4" front springs, Caprice Wagon CC623 (3.5") rear springs, BL, BMML, Rokmen TT, SJ Hydros
Yellow Jeep Club Member #4
http://www.toddsplace.com

Last edited by tjthorson; 06-24-2007 at 06:50 AM..
tjthorson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 11:42 AM   #21
Jerry Bransford
Do it right or not at all
 
Jerry Bransford's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Escondido, California, California
Posts: 54,490
Quote:
Originally Posted by dspgajeep
I didn't think K&N filters were that bad.
Of all the air filters tested in a very scientific (ISO) study, the K&N proved to be the worst of them all. It passed an alarming amount of dirt in the study, one reason I stopped using my K&N air filter. Even before I saw the below test results, I had noticed a lot of grime and crap was getting past my K&N which is why I ended up installing a K&N Outerwears pre-filter. When that wasn't quite enough, I then added a second-prefilter on top of the Outerwears, a foam Unifilter. I eventually removed my K&N air filter, it just wasn't an adequate air filter for the dusty desert conditions I wheel in.

Here's one just one of several charts from that ISO 5011 (International Standards Organization) test of air filters at http://www.duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm

Quoting from that report for the below chart...

"In the chart above it’s important to note the different test durations for each filter. The AC Delco filter test ran for 60 minutes before exceeding the restriction limit while the AMSOIL and K&N tests each ran for 20 and 24 minutes respectively before reaching max restriction. In 60 minutes the AC Filter accumulated 574gms of dirt and passed only 0.4gms. After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed 7.0gms. Compared to the AC air filter, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
k-n-filter-chart.jpg 

__________________
Gone to King of the Hammers, back Sunday!

Jerry's Geezer Jeep II Website

Getting Savvy...

Coolest offroad magazine ever! CRAWL Magazine

When you have a choice, buy American.
Jerry Bransford is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 02:01 PM   #22
claytonandson
Web Wheeler
 
claytonandson's Avatar
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: southern maryland
Posts: 1,243
went w/ the aem brute force on mine along w/ tbs. makes a neat diesel sort of whistling sound now, sort of like the batmobile. i think it goes faster...but i did eat a lot of shrooms in the 70's.geez jerry,there you go w/ those scientific chart things again. i got a neat one from BG about oil and oil filters if ya ever wanna see it.
__________________
yellow jeep club #343
IAFF /FF's OF WASH. D.C. EMERALD SOCIETY/CHARLES COUNTY RESCUE SQUAD 51

Last edited by claytonandson; 06-25-2007 at 07:46 AM..
claytonandson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 02:40 PM   #23
BYuen
Wahoowa
 
BYuen's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: , Arkansas
Posts: 3,264
Got an AEM sounds cool and I notice a bit better performance by the seat of my pants compared to a stock intake. It really picks up after 2000 rpm. But yes, my advice is to spend the money elsewhere b/c the gains just aren't worth the cash. The only reason I got mine is to replace the beat up AirRaid the guy before me put under the hood.
__________________
White 01 TJ Sport 4.0 NV3550
BYuen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 03:21 PM   #24
tomsv700
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: charleston, SC
Posts: 9
buy a snorkel kit, you know how hard it is to get mud out of a k&n? i do and it sucks. i like the fipk on mine for the street and it goes well with the edge trail jammer but when that fan catches hold of some water or mud it's gonna get on the filter.
p.s. anyone wanna trade a snorkel for a k&n fipk?
tomsv700 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2007, 10:08 PM   #25
dspgajeep
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford
Of all the air filters tested in a very scientific (ISO) study, the K&N proved to be the worst of them all. It passed an alarming amount of dirt, the main reason I stopped using my K&N air filter.

Here's one chart from an ISO 5011 (International Standards Organization) test of air filters at http://www.duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm

Quoting from that report for the below chart...

"In the chart above it’s important to note the different test durations for each filter. The AC Delco filter test ran for 60 minutes before exceeding the restriction limit while the AMSOIL and K&N tests each ran for 20 and 24 minutes respectively before reaching max restriction. In 60 minutes the AC Filter accumulated 574gms of dirt and passed only 0.4gms. After only 24 minutes the K&N had accumulated 221gms of dirt but passed 7.0gms. Compared to the AC, the K&N “plugged up” nearly 3 times faster, passed 18 times more dirt and captured 37% less dirt."
Well, that is some pretty hard data. I will be picking up an AC Delco air filter tomorrow during lunch.
__________________
New, but opinionated.

2003 Rubicon
Warn M8000, Tuffy Bolt Locks, Best top Soft Top, OEM Hard Top, Warn Tow Hooks, Class III Hidden Hitch, Scanegauge II, Cobra CB 40x with Firestik II antenna, Sirius Radio, Topfive Rack (avoid), All J 2x3 Rubicon Boulderbars, and HF Cargo Carrier.
dspgajeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 12:31 PM   #26
mrsnicks
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 214
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jerry Bransford
Of all the air filters tested in a very scientific (ISO) study, the K&N proved to be the worst of them all. It passed an alarming amount of dirt in the study, one reason I stopped using my K&N air filter. Even before I saw the below test results, I had noticed a lot of grime and crap was getting past my K&N which is why I ended up installing a K&N Outerwears pre-filter. When that wasn't quite enough, I then added a second-prefilter on top of the Outerwears, a foam Unifilter. I eventually removed my K&N air filter, it just wasn't an adequate air filter for the dusty desert conditions I wheel in.

Here's one just one of several charts from that ISO 5011 (International Standards Organization) test of air filters at http://www.duramax-diesel.com/spicer/index.htm
Not to be a nay-sayer, or beat a dead horse, but currently I drive my Jeep as a daily driver strictly on the highway. I do not encounter any dusty/dirty conditions, so is it that the K%N is crap, or it just doesn't pull it's weight under certain conditions?





Patrick
mrsnicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 12:45 PM   #27
SJP
Registered User
TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 568
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrsnicks
Not to be a nay-sayer, or beat a dead horse, but currently I drive my Jeep as a daily driver strictly on the highway. I do not encounter any dusty/dirty conditions, so is it that the K%N is crap, or it just doesn't pull it's weight under certain conditions?
You certainly encounter dirty/dusty conditions, but you may not realize it. Think of things this way: you don't see airborne dust in your house, but it ends up on the furniture anyway. Similarly, you don't see airborne pine pollen when driving, but you know it's there when your parked car is yellow from being covered in it.
__________________
Steve
Minister of Propaganda
SJP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-29-2007, 12:46 PM   #28
SuperWade2
More Money than Brains
 
SuperWade2's Avatar
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Scotts Valley, CA
Posts: 3,303
I would gladly trade someone my K&N FIPK setup for a stock box/tube/filter, etc....

I sold my stock one not too long after I installed the FIPK....

SW2
SuperWade2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2007, 02:01 AM   #29
fatfreddy
Registered User
2008 WK 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 372
Quote:
Originally Posted by 702Jeep
Wondering if anyone who has put the k&n fuel injection performance kit on their tj can tell me how well it actually works and if i should grab one. im a poor college student so i need to invest my money very wisely. thanks guys.
Go for it.I have run K&N filters on every jeep I have owned for the past 17 years and never had any problem with dust ingestion.I put one on my 2003 Rubicon 4 years ago along with catback exhaust.Also augered out my throttle body to 62 mm.Fuel milage went from 15 to 19 miles per gallon.This is real world driving results calculated properly.You have to do a cat back to get full effect of FIPK.Air is getting in much easier so exhaust has to get out easier.I am so tired of guys cursing these and other air filter kits.If they were as bad as everyone says you would think you would be hearing about law suites about engine failures all these guys think will happen from useing them.I spend lots of time on gravel roads up here in Canada.Very fine dast and dryer than a pop corns fart.The dealer replaced my hydaulic lifters a while back under warranty recently and I had a look at the cylinders and stuff with the head off.No sign of pre-mature wear from dust they say these filters let in.Anybody that thinks a a stock air intake with small diameter tubing and 2 90 degree elbows and an acordian in the middle of it needs to buy a new calculator and redo there volume calculations.
fatfreddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2008, 07:10 PM   #30
Rush1184
Registered User
1993 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 263
What do you all think about running a K&N on the road and putting a paper one in before hitting the trails, or not worth it?
__________________
[URL="http://groups.jeepforum.com/Square_Headlights"][I]Square Headlights[/I] - Founder[/URL]
[URL="http://groups.jeepforum.com/Green_Jeep_Club"][I]New Green Jeep Club[/I] - Member #2[/URL]
1993 YJ Green/Spice - 6cyl 4.0L AX-15
2x KC Daylighters on windshield hinges, front hooks, rear shackle, 20' strap, shovel, saw, tools, air compressor, etc.
--------
FOR SALE:
- Set of 4 used 33x14.5r15 Mickey Thompson Baja Belted HP Tires on Alloy Rims (5 on 5.5 bolt pattern).
- 2x white 6" KC Stone Guards (NEW)
(PM me if interested)
Rush1184 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads




Glock Forum



Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.

Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved