Improving the TJ's 2.5L gas engine's efficiency -

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 06:54 AM Thread Starter
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Basingstoke
Posts: 3
Improving the TJ's 2.5L gas engine's efficiency

Some time back, someone told me that power and torque gains are available from TJ 2.5L engines by fitting the YJ's 2.5L fuel injectors. My informant advised that efficiency would be improved due to the YJ injectors having a slightly bigger internal diameter to those fitted as standard on the TJ 2.5L engine.

Is this the case and, if so, is it a simply a matter of swopping out the injectors and resetting the ECU? Any subsequent increase in air flow/volume that may be required should not be a problem, as my TJ is fitted with a larger bore non-restrictive air induction/intake system. Please note that the current intake system already benefits from the fitment of a Helix Power Tower Plus throttle body spacer (highly recommended) which is further complimented by a couple of other proprietary "swirl" type devices, located within the induction pipework, between its truck air filter and the throttle body.

Oh, now why do I choose to drive a 2.5L? Because my TJ (plus driver's experience) can go off-tarmac wherever the 4.0L boys go but with better gas mileage. We are currently paying close to $1 PER LITRE for unleaded petrol in the UK and there are 4.55 litres in our Imperial (British) gallon!

Keep on Jeeping.


eurojeeper is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 07:13 AM
Registered User
2001 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,122
They are different injectors both at the connector and the psi output. I would think that they would not work...

Here is a good thread to help you out with the 2.5 injectors for the TJ:
aparke4 is offline  
post #3 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 07:13 AM
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: boston
Posts: 494
There are tons of posts on this-short version: you will not improve fuel efficiency with modified injectors. The ECU regulates HOW MUCH fuel the injector delivers, so an injector that can deliver larger amounts of fuel will be restricted by the ECU itself. Some folks have derived benefit from 4 port injectors from vehicles like certain Dodge Neon models-the theory behind this is that, even though the fuel delivered is the same amount, the improved distribution pattern from the injectors provides a better burn. The benefits are mainly around response and smoothness. Mileage improvements, from a general consensus, are negligible.

As for the rest of the widgets that you have, I really hate to say it, but they really aren't doing anything. These engines really don't react to such gadgets. In fact, the stock intake is not restrictive at all...most mods in this case are aesthetic, such as better sound of a CAI, or location specific (moving to protect against water).

TB spacers on these engines, in my direct experience, are non-effective. Mine has one from the PO, and i have run it with and without-have never noticed a difference. I have it in there because the PO also modified the intake to accommodate the TB spacer, and I have not gotten around to my cowl intake relocation project.

Proprietary Swirl devices- This is my logic on these....if you are looking to eliminate restriction in an intake, why would you put something into said intake that increases overall drag to the innards of said intake. The interference these devices introduce merely disrupt airflow, and in fact, provide restriction. I would love to be proven wrong here, but that is my reasoning.
77midget is offline  
post #4 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 10:58 AM
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Houston
Posts: 314
The only way to get better fuel efficiency is to drive slower. On a cross-country drive last year in my Daughter's jeep we would get 20 mpg or better at 55 mph, at 70 mph we would get less than 16. At 70 mph we actually got worse mileage than my younger daughters jeep with the 4.o engine.
JealousDad is offline  
post #5 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 11:13 AM
Registered User
2001 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 11,589
Just by installing larger injectors will do nothing UNLESS you do something with the valves, i.e. head work, cam size, ECU settings and so on. Also TB spacers do nothing as well as the air sucked into the engine is determined by what? The VALVES and CAM SHAFT. An engine is nothing more than a fancy air pump.
JBTJ is offline  
post #6 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 11:15 AM
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Russia
Posts: 217
The only improvement in 2.5L fuel consumption I got was because of regearing. I used to get 18 mpg on highway cruising around 60 mph with 31 tires and 4.1 gears, now I get 19.5 mpg with 33 tires and 4.88 gears. But regearing is a rather expensive way to save some money

2002 TJ 2.5L
glook is offline  
post #7 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 11:56 AM
The Devil's Advocate
TheBoogieman's Avatar
2003 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CharlottesHELL
Posts: 33,812
Originally Posted by eurojeeper View Post
We are currently paying close to $1 PER LITRE
I paid $28 US dollars for a litre the other day.It was Grey Goose though.

Originally Posted by mrblaine View Post
If you can tolerate the Bilsteins, that will invalidate any discussion you and I may have from now on.They are real handy at determining if a quarter is heads or tails simply by passing a tire over it.
TheBoogieman is offline  
post #8 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 02:32 PM
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: CT
Posts: 601
Having owned the TJ 2.5L and later two other 4.0Ls, I can tell you that there really is no cost-effective way to squeeze worthwhile power out of that engine. It is what it is and in stock or near-stock form, it does very well. TB spacers, air intakes, all that $100 crap does nothing.

As far as torque goes, look into the inertia ring go to on the flywheel if you really want to. This is help build torque without looking for it at higher RPMs. But you'll need to drop the whole trans to install...

And as mentioned, keep axle gearing proportional to tire size. You'll do far worse on gas mileage if you are lugging.

Yes, there are a few superchargers out there- but that costs roughly what it would to swap an engine and you'll be running higher-octane fuel.

No replacement for displacement. If the lack of power in the 2.5L bugs you to the point of contemplating multi-thousand dollar power mods, just trade it in and get a 4.0L or a Pentastar JK.

2013 2500HD
2005 Unlimited
2003 Rubicon
2000 SE
1997 XJ
85 FJ-60
goofus is offline  
post #9 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 04:23 PM
Registered User
2001 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 2,122
Hpa makes a tdi diesel swap but with motor and install unless you are a boss and can do it yourself you are looking at 7k

I have a friend that did a 5.0 mustang v8 swap for under 3k

Stroking or supercharging the 2.5 is cool factor points but will cost 2k plus to do it right...

Roller rockers are 400, efan 10-250, an with intake exhaust headers and programmer you are already in the 1000 dollar range and that is without synthetic fluids, gears or additional cooling upgrades. If I knew what I know now, as much as I like the 2.5, I would keep my magnaflow muffler, keep my drop in aem dryflow filter and keep it bone stock with gears. Or, swap over a 4.0 or srt turbo. If I was feeling uber cool, swap in a tdi diesel.

Cliff notes: keep as close to stock or switch with a larger displacement motor.
aparke4 is offline  
post #10 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 04:25 PM
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Bernardino
Posts: 506
prius engine swap
ItsJustD is offline  
post #11 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 07:33 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Grayling MI.
Posts: 578
So funny.

Originally Posted by ItsJustD View Post
prius engine swap

2000 Sport.
redvett94 is offline  
post #12 of 12 Old 05-12-2013, 07:35 PM
Have Cummins, Will tow.
RnEmOvr's Avatar
1999 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: El Paso
Posts: 11,999
Best way to improve fuel efficiency of the 2.5 is to take it out. I get same if not better milage with my 4.0 after the swap. V8 guys get even better.
RnEmOvr is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome