Goodbye Long Arms... hello short arms - Page 38 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > TJ Wrangler Technical Forum > Goodbye Long Arms... hello short arms

Engo winches available at www.rockridge4wd.com! Free shippOur 2014 DynoMax mail-in rebate March1- June 30th is here!OPTIC ARMOR WINDOWS all sale now !!!!!!!!

Reply
Unread 02-29-2012, 09:33 AM   #556
Robert J. yates
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mars
Posts: 2,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldGloryLJ View Post
Thanks, would that be La Verne, Earth?
.
Yah..... Here on business

I'll get in touch with you later today.

__________________
1998 TJ Sport
Locked, Geared, Armored, 35's
2014 Grand Cherokee Overland
Ecodiesel, QDII, ORA, Class IV Tow, 18's
Robert J. yates is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 09:36 AM   #557
Robert J. yates
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: mars
Posts: 2,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by rippinbmore View Post
That is one filthy looking lift.

check out my jeep

http://mylifeisjeep.blogspot.com/

Do you comprehend the terms "under construction" and "mock-up"? Next time before opening up your mouth, read the entire thread. That picture was from 2 years ago.
__________________
1998 TJ Sport
Locked, Geared, Armored, 35's
2014 Grand Cherokee Overland
Ecodiesel, QDII, ORA, Class IV Tow, 18's
Robert J. yates is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 12:41 PM   #558
wushaw
Rockin jeep
 
wushaw's Avatar
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 8,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrblaine View Post
I would never re-use the small joint on a single upper due to you now asking 1 arm to do the work that used to be done by two. I firmly believe in using the larger joints found in the lower arms on both ends of a smaller diameter single upper link.

You are welcome to disregard any and all of that drivel though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
Personally, I think the 2" joints are too small. Even if it were seen as "feasible", my decision is already made up. I'd be much less worried about the cast mount and more worried about that tiny joint. I plan on using 1.25" shank 2.5" JJ's if I move to a single upper.
X2 on all this.
wushaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 01:57 PM   #559
pcoplin
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by wushaw View Post
X2 on all this.
I agree, and have built as such. But I'm wondering if there have actually been any failures, not only just because we *think* it's not enough joint. I know I do, but it's something to think about.
__________________
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
85 Wagoneer 5.2/44RE
01 F250 Powerstroke 7.3/ZF6
Ultra4 KOH #689 car
pcoplin is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 02:07 PM   #560
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 19,075
I wouldn't be worried about the actual joint or even a bolt (providing you used a 1/2" or larger center ball) failing. The smaller joints are just not as preloaded and the bushing halves are smaller. It certainly wouldn't happen overnight but they'd wear out....at least that's what I feel would be the case. They do fine when sharing the load but the bigger joints have been proven to hold up no matter what for a very long time.
__________________
OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 02:52 PM   #561
mrblaine
Web Wheeler
 
mrblaine's Avatar
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quail Valley, California
Posts: 24,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcoplin View Post
I agree, and have built as such. But I'm wondering if there have actually been any failures, not only just because we *think* it's not enough joint. I know I do, but it's something to think about.
It's not a strength issue. You can take a 3/4 x 3/4" rod end and use it in a lower link all day long without approaching it's 40,000 odd pound rated static load capacity, they just wear out faster than the 1 x 1.25's do.

Same with the small upper, the joints will wear faster but I'm pretty sure they wouldn't fail under normal use.
__________________
I am Savvy
blackmagicbrakes.com
mrblaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 03:24 PM   #562
Necromancer_tat
Where'd all my money go?
 
Necromancer_tat's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 4,875
With the larger upper joint, is the strength enough to compensate for side to side movement of the axle when combined with the 2 lower joints, and the trackbar joints in a DW situation? It seems like only having one upper joint would leave the axle centering responsibility to the track bar joints and the lower control arm joints... so should all of those be upgraded as well?
__________________
1.Your signature cannot be longer than 100 characters including BB code markup.
Necromancer_tat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 03:30 PM   #563
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 19,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer_tat View Post
so should all of those be upgraded as well?
How do you intend to upgrade over the big 2.5" JJ's?
__________________
OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 03:49 PM   #564
Climbit
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
How do you intend to upgrade over the big 2.5" JJ's?
why the billet chromolly joints with the chemically polished center balls of course
Climbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 04:20 PM   #565
pcoplin
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer_tat View Post
With the larger upper joint, is the strength enough to compensate for side to side movement of the axle when combined with the 2 lower joints, and the trackbar joints in a DW situation? It seems like only having one upper joint would leave the axle centering responsibility to the track bar joints and the lower control arm joints... so should all of those be upgraded as well?
Pretty sure you could mount 12 parallel links and the trackbar is all that will locate the axle. That's why it's called a TRACK bar. The links aren't going to see any side load from the axle.
__________________
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
85 Wagoneer 5.2/44RE
01 F250 Powerstroke 7.3/ZF6
Ultra4 KOH #689 car
pcoplin is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 04:41 PM   #566
Necromancer_tat
Where'd all my money go?
 
Necromancer_tat's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 4,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
How do you intend to upgrade over the big 2.5" JJ's?
I don't. They're nice and beefy. I'm curious about the axle side to side movement while only using one upper joint? I'm not saying it isn't plenty, I'm just wondering how it compares.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Climbit View Post
why the billet chromolly joints with the chemically polished center balls of course
The new Billet joints are sexxy, but not what I'm wondering about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pcoplin View Post
Pretty sure you could mount 12 parallel links and the trackbar is all that will locate the axle. That's why it's called a TRACK bar. The links aren't going to see any side load from the axle.
First off, there would be no need ever for 12 parallel links to locate an axle. Second, at the axle side only 3 attachment points are needed to locate it.
Third, the links experience axial loading, thus they see minimal side loads...
4th, a triangulated 4 link has no need for a track bar to locate the axle.
__________________
1.Your signature cannot be longer than 100 characters including BB code markup.
Necromancer_tat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 04:42 PM   #567
pcoplin
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Necromancer_tat View Post


First off, there would be no need ever for 12 parallel links to locate an axle. Second, at the axle side only 3 attachment points are needed to locate it.
Third, the links experience axial loading, thus they will never never see side loads...
4th, a triangulated 4 link has no need for a track bar to locate the axle.
Really? Then WTF are you asking above?
__________________
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
85 Wagoneer 5.2/44RE
01 F250 Powerstroke 7.3/ZF6
Ultra4 KOH #689 car
pcoplin is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 04:51 PM   #568
Necromancer_tat
Where'd all my money go?
 
Necromancer_tat's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Norfolk, Virginia
Posts: 4,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcoplin View Post
Really? Then WTF are you asking above?
I was asking if the larger single upper joint in a 3 link set up was strong enough to help the track bar out in reguards to keeping the front axle in line.
__________________
1.Your signature cannot be longer than 100 characters including BB code markup.
Necromancer_tat is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 05:05 PM   #569
Deacon
Web Wheeler
 
Deacon's Avatar
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 4,393
The stock location upper link does not help the track bar keep anything in line in the first place, so the point is moot.
Deacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-29-2012, 05:10 PM   #570
mrblaine
Web Wheeler
 
mrblaine's Avatar
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Quail Valley, California
Posts: 24,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deacon View Post
The stock location upper link does not help the track bar keep anything in line in the first place, so the point is moot.
Really? So, if I remove all four control arms and push on the axle directly sideways, it won't move to the front or back?
__________________
I am Savvy
blackmagicbrakes.com
mrblaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
control arms , currie , custom , fabrication , long arms , mod , modification , savvy , short arms , suspension , tj , wrangler
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.