|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
|
33x14.5r15 vs 37x12.5r15 for mud
33x14.5r15 vs 37x12.5r15 for mud? Should I go for depth or floatation? Which ones shed better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
|
First of all I can tell you that theres no way in hell you can fit 37's on what you have now lol. But i would say the 33's cause mud tires are all about the width. Not to sure, but the 14.5" wides would look crazy wide.
__________________
99' Sport: 33's with 3.5" RE & 8k lbs winch |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
|
all I have to do is order 5.5 springs, no adjustment to shocks or suspension
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Locked @ both ends
|
Difference between 37's and 33 is a lot. 37's break things very easy. Even the difference between 33's and 35's is more than you think. You are running 31's now, your gears probably would barely turn them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
|
I have to regear anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Bob
__________________
1996 Land Rover Discovery with a bunch of stuff on super swampers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
|
well the shocks I have are designed for any height RE long arm lift. As a matter of fact the whole kit is exactly like the 5.5 minus springs. I already Am SYE'd with Tom woods cv but from what I am reading I would have to have ultra stout drive train for 37's. would y'all say beyond D44s for 37's?
Oh, I probably need to spell out that "Rubicon Express Long Arm" in my signature... ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
|
I didnt see the LA at the end of your sig. Iv never seen anyone with a 5.5 with substituted 3.5 inch springs... You must have a nice ride. I also didnt know you could use the same shocks on the 3.5 as the 5.5.
The 37's are pushing the 44 IMHO. But I dont want to go full width yet, and I only want 60's in full width. Bob
__________________
1996 Land Rover Discovery with a bunch of stuff on super swampers |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
|
24.5/14.5 L/L 26.5/15.50 S/L Front
Same shock dimensions 3.5 through 5.5 because flex is always the same. My 3.5 nets more like 4.5 so I would anticipate the 5.5 to be closer to 7, like you sayed. So clearance is not my issue. It's a hard decision since I have to regear either way. I just don't want to be stuck doing something again because I was not pleased with the height. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
|
Yea, if I was in yuor boat, I would go with 35's and regear to 4.88's and upgrade axle shafts, and be done.
Bob
__________________
1996 Land Rover Discovery with a bunch of stuff on super swampers |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
|
so, 35 12.5 better in mud than 33 14.5's?......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
|
To be honest im not sure. Some people say that you want to float on top and some people say you want to dig down.... I live in mass and there is a mix of both..i will be going with a 37X12.5R15
Bob
__________________
1996 Land Rover Discovery with a bunch of stuff on super swampers |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
|
God I love Colorado... no stupid mudd. Rocks are fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: White Sulphur Springs, West Virginia
Posts: 538
|
Go with the 35's they will be alot easier to turn in the mud than the 14.50 wide tires.
__________________
98 ZJ 5.2, LA n Locked 35's 01 XJ 2dr, 4.0 5spd 86 MJ 07 Ram 2500 5.9 ctd |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
| Suggested Threads |
|
|
|
|
Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.
|