Weber carb upgrade took the "lope" out of my cam? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep CJ Forum > Weber carb upgrade took the "lope" out of my cam?

Ruffstuff Axle Simple Swap Kit!Ruffstuff's Monster Shock Brackets!Even Better Heim Pricing! From Ruffstuff

Reply
Unread 02-11-2013, 09:37 AM   #1
10129
Member
 
10129's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Covington, LA
Posts: 259
Weber carb upgrade took the "lope" out of my cam?

Ok, somebody school me on this please. I have the 258 with a mild cam in it and had been running an MC2100 carb. It ran great and one of the things I like about the setup was it really loped at idle. It sounded like an old school V8 at about 600 RPM. I had a Weber 38 in the garage and finally got around to buying the adapter plates for it and installed it this weekend. It runs great, has amazing throttle response and returns to idle very smoothly. The odd thing is it now idles much smoother and does not lope. The difference is noticeable. I always attributed lope to having a good cam. Can some explain why changing the carb would affect the lope or the sound of the motor at idle?

__________________
1981 Jeep CJ7
258,T-5, D300, NT AMC-20 & Dana 30 (4.10)
Locked front and rear
10129 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 02-11-2013, 10:30 AM   #2
Matt1981CJ7
Web Wheeler
 
Matt1981CJ7's Avatar
1981 CJ7 
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Elbert, CO
Posts: 10,951
As I understand it, the "lope" is caused by valve overlap, which is not necessarily a good thing.

I think people equate the "lope" with race car engines, so they think that's how the idle is suppose to sound. In reality, those engines are designed to run at extremely high RPMs, and their long duration cams causes rough, inconsistent, and inefficient idle quality.

It sounds like your 38 is tuned better for your engine than the 2100 was. I love the Weber 38 for a 258.

Matt
Matt1981CJ7 is online now   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools






Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.