v8 or 6 cyl with Dana 44? - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 12:51 PM Thread Starter
Stumpfarming
Registered User
1974 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Angeles
Posts: 686
v8 or 6 cyl with Dana 44?

I just picked up a 73' CJ5 with no engine, tranny, or t-case. In bringing it back to life I want to use the stock Dana 30 and Dana 44 axles, but I am not sure which is the best direction to head regarding engine/powertrain. I like the idea of a Ford 302/T18 combo; however, I am wondering if this may be a bit much for the stock axles (especially with lockers)? My other line of thought is to keep it simple and go with a later model 4.0L with a stock or common tranny/t-case combo. I would like to run 33's when I have it put together. Depending on tranny/t-case combo, I am wondering if I can keep the stock 3.73 diffs? or does stepping up to the 33's commit me to atleast 4.11's regardless of tranny/t-case?

This is my first jeep, and I'm looking to build a reliable rig that can hit some moderate trails. I feel I have a huge opportunity here given that I have "clean slate" to start with. Thanks for any constructive input.

Stumpfarming is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 02:04 PM
ridge28
Registered User
1964 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: puyallup
Posts: 100
pretty sure your dana 44 will be just fine might consider a 44 up front as well but he 302 and 18 combo sounds pretty good
ridge28 is offline  
post #3 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 02:34 PM
my73CJ
Registered User
1973 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Monroe
Posts: 508
I have the 304, T18a tranny and the dana 300 TC with the stock dana 30 and 44 axles w/lockers. The 3.73 with 33 would be okay, I have 35's and I went with 4.27 gears.ust didn't want to go up to the 4.56 due to the small pinion gear for the 30. But my set-up works pretty good. Hope that helps
my73CJ is offline  
post #4 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 02:59 PM Thread Starter
Stumpfarming
Registered User
1974 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Angeles
Posts: 686
Thanks for the feedback. Should I shy away from a solid locker, such as a Detroit? I figured I would address the 3.73 gears once I got it on the road to see how it felt in low range and where the speedometer tops out. Looking for a set-up that can pull 55 mph on the highway, not much more. I have a trailer for any longer trips.

Considering I have no tranny or t-case either, are there any advantages to going with a more recent 4.0, in terms of available parts, ease of install, etc.?
Stumpfarming is offline  
post #5 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 03:14 PM
ridge28
Registered User
1964 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: puyallup
Posts: 100
There will be more wires to figure out with a newer 4.0
ridge28 is offline  
post #6 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 03:58 PM Thread Starter
Stumpfarming
Registered User
1974 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Angeles
Posts: 686
I was thinking in terms of the mounting and/or fabrication required to support an engine/tranny conversion, vs installation of a newer "jeep" product. If both would require similar fabrication and/or conversion hardware, then I would lean towards the 302 conversion. If a 4.0 can be a simple "bolt in" installation project, then I might lean that way, knowing I would need to upgrade some wiring for the EFI.
Stumpfarming is offline  
post #7 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 04:39 PM
ridge28
Registered User
1964 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: puyallup
Posts: 100
Check out the Novak adapters web site it will tell you everything you need and what different combos will work, really helpful website
ridge28 is offline  
post #8 of 9 Old 11-12-2013, 05:37 PM Thread Starter
Stumpfarming
Registered User
1974 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Port Angeles
Posts: 686
Thanks! The Novak site is great!
Stumpfarming is offline  
post #9 of 9 Old 11-13-2013, 09:14 AM
strvger01
Registered User
1966 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Two Harbors
Posts: 1,111
i have detroit lockers in my jeep and in my '83 ford ranger pickup. love them! way quieter, smoother, and stronger than lockrights, powertrax, and similar lockers. well worth the extra money, imho.

1966 CJ5A, mods are coming
1966 Wagoneer, bone stock
strvger01 is offline  
Reply

Tags
302 swap , dana 44 , t18 , v8 conversion

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome