Too Tall, Too Narrow? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep CJ Forum > Too Tall, Too Narrow?

RuffStuff Memorial Day Sale!Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineBuild your Dream Jeep with Poison Spyder's Interactive Gar

Reply
Unread 04-02-2009, 09:43 PM   #1
elks96
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: CO
Posts: 489
Too Tall, Too Narrow?

OK guys I am going from a 2.5 RE XD to a 4.5. I am currently Running a 34x9.50 Tire. The rim does not have much off set. So as of right now The lugs on the tires are inside Flares.

My buddy claims that if i go to the 4.5 lift that I will start being too top heavy and risk a roll over issues. He claims that I need to go to a 35X12.50 Tire.

Do you agree? Will My 4.5 RE XD and 1.25 body lift and 9.5 wide tires be an issue?

If so what can I do to fix it for cheap? Wheel Spacers?

__________________
1985 CJ 7 258 bored/Cammed, MotorCraft Carb, Mallory Ignition, NP435/Dana 300, 4.5 RE Ex, 1.25 JKS Body Lift, Detriot AMC 20 Rear(detroit locker and Warn Hub Conversion), Herculined Tub, Chevy Heater Blower, 34" Swampers, Custom Rear Bumper, more to come....

1972 K5 8" lift, 36" swampers, lockers, custom paint.
elks96 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2009, 09:57 PM   #2
Totallymetal
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by elks96 View Post
The lugs on the tires are inside Flares.
Not sure what that means?

I have 4" spring and 1" body and I am very stable with 35 x 12.5 x 15... but I am light on top with fiberglass. Also 10" rims with 4" backspace.
__________________

2007 JK Rubicon
5.5 Rock Krawler X-factor lift w/37 x 12.5 x 17 BFG KM2s, 5.13 Superior gears
Warn Powerplant HD

Totallymetal is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2009, 10:11 PM   #3
PavementPounder
Cool as Ice...
 
PavementPounder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Birmingham, Michigan
Posts: 2,651
So you're saying you have somewhat high backspacing for the width of the wheel and they are tucked inside the flare?

Whenever you lift, you should technically increase track to compensate for the additional height. Generally speaking, you don't have a lot of lift compared to many Jeeps. Yes, spacers could be a solution if you don't like the new handling characteristics after you lift it further. I'd wait and see how it feels after you do it. Its not like the wind is going to blow it over.
__________________
This is how NAXJA Midwest Chapter elected officials like to treat their resident users and former multi-year supporters.


<--- Click "Classifieds" under my avatar to see all my parts (mostly CJ & XJ) currently for sale on JeepForum!
PavementPounder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-02-2009, 11:11 PM   #4
elks96
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: CO
Posts: 489
Yeah I mean the tires are tucked completely in the wheel flares. It is awesome for flex cause they go all the way up in my wells and fo not rub at all now. That means ful flex no rubs.

I am thinking it will not be too bad. I mean I see jeeps with 6+ lifts and stock width. Of course they are runn 38s.
__________________
1985 CJ 7 258 bored/Cammed, MotorCraft Carb, Mallory Ignition, NP435/Dana 300, 4.5 RE Ex, 1.25 JKS Body Lift, Detriot AMC 20 Rear(detroit locker and Warn Hub Conversion), Herculined Tub, Chevy Heater Blower, 34" Swampers, Custom Rear Bumper, more to come....

1972 K5 8" lift, 36" swampers, lockers, custom paint.
elks96 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 07:07 AM   #5
deadeye
Registered User
1983 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: sw ohio
Posts: 353
You might want to ditch the body lift if you think its unstable that will put you back to almost where you are now.
__________________
83 CJ7, 350 TBI, TH350, Dana 300 twin stick, Dana 30, Ford 8.8, Detroits, 4:10 gears, 35x13.5x15s
"Just Exchange Every Part"
deadeye is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 07:21 AM   #6
BriansCJ
Registered User
1994 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 3,761
Yea definately go wider. When i lift my 5 i am making the axles 5 inches wider and wheels with 3.75 BS.
__________________
5 Speed XJ Build - Daily Driver & Weekend Wheeler
1978 CJ5 Resto, w/ heavy mods - Slow
BriansCJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 07:55 AM   #7
Happy Joe
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,365
I would also loose the body lift.
I don't see rollover as being a huge issue (I use 12.50 x 35s on narrow track axles without any problems), just drive carefully.

Even with the body lift I don't see much issue as you have the wide track axles, if they are still stock. After all is said and done; its the driver that has the biggest influence on rollover potential.

Enjoy!
__________________
...a well prepped, well driven, vehicle should do well in any terrain, including the highway.

Carburetors became obsolete during the last century... do what ever it takes to get fuel injection...It makes bigger grins off road.
Happy Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 08:33 AM   #8
4x42
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 39
A general rule is match the lift to width. ie: 1" taller = 1" wider.
4x42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 09:42 AM   #9
JoonHoss
Registered User
2011 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 5,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by elks96 View Post
Yeah I mean the tires are tucked completely in the wheel flares. It is awesome for flex cause they go all the way up in my wells and fo not rub at all now. That means ful flex no rubs....
so if you can do that now, why switch to a different (bigger) lift kit?

Hoss
__________________
Quote:
It's hard to say no to yoo-hoo, the name literally beckons...

Don't mind me, I'm just another FNG around here...
JoonHoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 01:10 PM   #10
Mike Romain
Registered User
1986 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Off the Grid in Chester Grant, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 9,208
Why would you want to go illegal? In most places it is illegal to run with tires sticking out foolishly wide, they are supposed to be under your fender flares. This is for safety of you and the person behind you, tires toss rocks and water.

The wider tire will just drop your traction down radically without making very much difference in your center of gravity.
__________________
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG AT's, 'glass nose to tail in '00, 'New' frame,wires and plumbing in '09. Carter BBD Carbed 4.0 HO in '10. Some Canadian Bush Jeep Runs and Build Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com (10 new albums added Sept 16/10)
Mike Romain is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-03-2009, 04:12 PM   #11
26679cj5
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Blacksburg, Virginia
Posts: 804
my tires stick out just slightly past the flares and i have lost paint here and there from the occasional rock or gravel. if thats somethin that concerns you, i recommend getting wider flares. i have a fuberglass tub so it isnt a huge issue since i dont have to worry about rust forming.
26679cj5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-04-2009, 09:48 AM   #12
Happy Joe
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,365
Quote:
The wider tire will just drop your traction down radically
Not true... I have tried both wide and narrow and prefer the wide because they give me the better traction for my use (ignore all terrain tires they have little traction in either configuration) (I actually went to a narrower, 12.50, mud tire because it gives me less traction and helps keep me from breaking axles). Tire width is like the old Chevy vs. Ford argument it comes down to individual preference.

Narrow tires driven aggressively can damage the trails by creating trenches (one of my friends used to think it was cute to do this). In vehicle to vehicle friendly competition this same vehicle (narrow swampers) in 2wd could not make it to the obstacle that several vehicles with wider mud tires were able to drive up to and over in 2wd (all vehicles with lockers). This is just one example; I have also seen narrow swampers on rocks do well by catching the knobs on projections that the wider knob-less tires had problems with (more an issue of tread pattern than wide/narrow).

For equal tire construction (pressures, rubber compounds and sidewall stiffness, etc.) both wide and narrow tires will have equal area contact patches (but they will be different shapes). Some will argue this but their understanding is flawed.

Wide tires are known for being able to achieve flotation in deep mud and snow (given enough horsepower and RPM), the narrow tires will dig down until they are stuck or reach bottom.

Enjoy!
__________________
...a well prepped, well driven, vehicle should do well in any terrain, including the highway.

Carburetors became obsolete during the last century... do what ever it takes to get fuel injection...It makes bigger grins off road.
Happy Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-04-2009, 11:47 AM   #13
Ford_Prefect
Registered User
1984 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out West
Posts: 515
Quote:
Originally Posted by PavementPounder View Post
Whenever you lift, you should technically increase track to compensate for the additional height.
I disagree. I do not think that you need to have the thing wider for every lift you go up. VERY rarely do you see people actually do this.

It is blatantly obvious that if you lift a vehicle it will also raise the COG (center of gravity) so in that sense your friend is right, but to me it is a bit naive of him to say that.

Now, MY question would be WHY would you ever want to go higher if not for tire size? The only reason to lift a vehicle, in my opinion, is to get the bigger tires. The tire size is what gives you the clearance on the trail. If you lift your jeep but do not lift your axles with bigger tires then you really do not change your clearance much at all.

Consider that before you lift your jeep.

I personally feel, as do competition rock crawlers and rock racers, that bigger tires with as little lift as possible is the best route. Keeps your COG as low as possible, and still gives you as much axle clearance as possible.

That's my two bits

Good luck.
Ford_Prefect is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-04-2009, 12:21 PM   #14
elks96
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: CO
Posts: 489
Why would I lift with out going to bigger tires? Because I have only about 400 milews on the tires I have now. The idea behind this lift is to gain a little better appraoch angles and give room for a bigger tire someday. Also the other reason is I just installed a 21 gallon poly tanks which dropped my rear clearance about 4 inches. So lifting will help on the departure angle as well.

In all honesty I too believe that on lighter vehicles a narrow tire is better for traction. At some point I am gonna get a set of big wide tires, but only run them for deeper snow where I want to float.
__________________
1985 CJ 7 258 bored/Cammed, MotorCraft Carb, Mallory Ignition, NP435/Dana 300, 4.5 RE Ex, 1.25 JKS Body Lift, Detriot AMC 20 Rear(detroit locker and Warn Hub Conversion), Herculined Tub, Chevy Heater Blower, 34" Swampers, Custom Rear Bumper, more to come....

1972 K5 8" lift, 36" swampers, lockers, custom paint.
elks96 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 04-05-2009, 06:07 AM   #15
Mike Romain
Registered User
1986 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Off the Grid in Chester Grant, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 9,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Happy Joe View Post
(I actually went to a narrower, 12.50, mud tire because it gives me less traction and helps keep me from breaking axles).
My CJ7 is my daily driver...

Nothing 'narrow' about a 12.5" tire on a CJ7 in my mind, that is wide enough to totally blow the traction on the bush trails and snowy streets I drive on. They spin and dig holes way too easy.

Tall skinny tires don't spin up so I snap old frames and tear and literally shatter engine mounts from the torque. I didn't have those issues with the wide tire that spins out all the time.

We have had a winter 'shootout' at the sand pits and a fully locked and sway bar disconnected TJ with 33x12.5 muds can 'just' keep up to a CJ7 with open diffs, sway bars connected and 33x9.5 muds. We were a tie on all the runs.

When I went from a 10.5" tread to a 7.5" tread (33x9.5" tire), my traction increased radically!

On the highway in the snow with the 10.5's, I lost traction at about 45 mph, it started to float and lose steering. It is a real drag when you can't keep up to the transport trucks in a snow storm. When I went to the narrower tire, I have full control in the snow up to 60 mph and maybe even faster, but for sure can keep up with the big rigs.

Off road, the folks with fat tires laugh at my tall skinnies, Once... Then they spend the rest of the day "trying" to follow me... I walk up the sand put walls leaving a tread mark, then I sit up top taking photos of all the folks with fat tires making rooster tails until they dig holes and then try again and again and... (see my photo albums in my links)

Same for mud, the tall skinnies just don't spin up, I drive right on through. it almost makes mud running no fun because I have to clean it all under and have no mud up top to show for it.

Now if I want, I 'can' make them spin up to find bottom to dig me though, but I never seem to need to.

If you want to get into a flotation tire, you need to go really wide, but that is a different thing.

Just look at the tires the folks that work out in the bush use, you won't see any balloon tires on their trucks.

But as you say, tire preference is a personal thing, to each their own...
__________________
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG AT's, 'glass nose to tail in '00, 'New' frame,wires and plumbing in '09. Carter BBD Carbed 4.0 HO in '10. Some Canadian Bush Jeep Runs and Build Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com (10 new albums added Sept 16/10)
Mike Romain is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.