MOPAR MPFI kit question - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep CJ Forum > MOPAR MPFI kit question

RIGID LED Light Blowout Sale - All Sizes, All Series, all Truc-Lite LED Headlights! OCONEE OFF-ROAD 706-534-9955Jeep Wrangler Bushwacker Flat Fender Flare Sale at Baselin

Reply
Unread 03-12-2008, 07:53 PM   #1
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
MOPAR MPFI kit question

I was wondering why you are told to use 92 octane when you install the Mopar kit.
Anyone know why?

Thanks

OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-13-2008, 02:30 PM   #2
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
nobody as installed the kit?

Nobody has installed the Mopar kit?

Please.. any help would be great

gas is to expensive to be using a higher grade if it is not required

Nathan
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-13-2008, 08:11 PM   #3
Fourtrail
Registered User
1974 CJ6 
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 179
Most likely because of the timing advance w/ the mopar computer. Keeps motor from pinging. Same thing if you run a high performance computer.
__________________
80 CJ-5, 74 CJ-6, 56 CJ-5
Fourtrail is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-14-2008, 03:24 PM   #4
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
So your saying I really do need the high octane fuel? Even though the engine is not a high compression engine
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-14-2008, 04:30 PM   #5
roundlitefan
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Posts: 906
Well, just from this married guy's point of view, if I could afford to be putting a Matkins frame under my Jeep, and a $3000 MPFI system on it, the last thing I would be worried about is 92 octane gas.

I would pay that extra $.20/gal ($3/tank) and drive away from the pump with a big fat grin on my face.

Just my $.02
roundlitefan is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-15-2008, 07:31 AM   #6
HighCountry
Registered User
1986 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North East Texas, Texas
Posts: 998
I have always subscribed to Roundlite's point of view! More so now than ever, the percentage more per tank with $3.20 fuel versus $3.45 is tiny. $3.75 on a 15 gallon fill up that is costing $50.00 is too insignificant to worry with...

Bruce
HighCountry is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-15-2008, 06:42 PM   #7
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
Roundlite. When I bought the Mopar kit it was $1600 and the frame cost a lot less then a new jeep. Trust me, I am not doing the frame swap for fun...although I hope it will be

and second. $3.75 per tank over the course of a year is not an insignificant amount of money
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-27-2008, 08:03 PM   #8
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
Does anyone here have the mopar kit, or is it just me?
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-27-2008, 08:37 PM   #9
tsjeepcj
Registered User
1981 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: charlotte
Posts: 62
i've got the mopar kit and run premium in it. i bought it used from a buddy, and when we swapped it in complete with his motor, i had to run the rest of a tank of 87 through it. it didn't like it very much. sorry i can't help as to why it needs 93...the manual only says to run 93 if you get spark knock...btw, i love the mopar kit. it starts every time, runs good, and does great offroad....
__________________
81 cj7 on 37's...
tsjeepcj is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-27-2008, 10:15 PM   #10
73jeep
Registered User
1973 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Littleton, NH
Posts: 228
Try 87 and if it doesn't ping your fine, if it does retard the timing a little till it doesn't anymore, if you want to run 87 so much. Im guessing there is no knock sensor on this setup.
73jeep is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-28-2008, 12:41 AM   #11
CompGuru
Registered User
1983 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Grover Beach, CA
Posts: 201
I have an 1983 CJ7 with the 258 and I run 91. I found that the additional MPG overcomes the measly 0.20 cost difference. Also helps with highway speeds. Im sure it's different for everyone's Jeeps. I believe that Mr. Romain runs premium as well. As for the MOPAR kit I don't have one and I personnaly think that $2500 is highway robbery. For that much you could put in a better, newer engine or just do a 4.0L swap and get the same effect.

Dustin
__________________
1983 Jeep CJ7 White

Team Rush, Halogen Headlights, Nutter Bypass, more to come...

"There is no mechanical problem too tough that cannot be fixed by brute strength and ignorance."

"Remember, Amateurs built the Ark, Professionals built the Titanic."
CompGuru is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 03-28-2008, 05:44 PM   #12
Rob55
Member
1984 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 488
I have the MPI kit and like it a lot. I have run 89 in it and it did ok, but it prefers the 91/92 available here (CA). You can play with the timing a bit to smooth it out for lower octane but the performance suffers., but I have just gone with running the 91/92 all the time. The MPI kit is a little expensive but you don't see a lot of posts asking for help with it like the carb and TPI solutions (both of which work great if you know what you are doing for maint and install). I have run it at sea level one day and at 7000 ft the next, no problems.
__________________
1984 CJ7, 258, MPI, 4.0 head, Borla, 700r4, amc20 (detroit), Dana 30 (OX), 4.56 gears, Warn Hubs, Dana 300 with 4:1, 4.5 RE lift with 1" body, Bilsteins, dual battery, PS, PB, full cage, two dogs in the back....
Rob55 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 05-16-2008, 07:36 AM   #13
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
Thanks, I run 89 and it seems fine, I just want to make sure I am not causing long term damage
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 05-16-2008, 05:04 PM   #14
sed437
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 7
I don't know why, but I put the kit on my 85 CJ7 and use the cheapest 87 octane I can find and it runs great.
sed437 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 05-18-2008, 09:10 AM   #15
OSUAV8R
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 229
thanks, I use 89 and it seems very happy, I just wondered why they say 93.. there is no point in using a higher octane unless for a real reason..
OSUAV8R is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.