cj5 widetrac? - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep CJ Forum > cj5 widetrac?

Rough Country Lift Kits and Parts!XJ Rail Sale!The Ruffstuff NOT Universal 4 Link Kit!

Reply
Unread 10-19-2009, 09:24 AM   #16
COBRA5LADDICT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 292
i have had a dozen 83's and all of which were narrow track.

COBRA5LADDICT is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-19-2009, 03:48 PM   #17
62galaxie
Registered User
1983 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: new jersey
Posts: 11
I guess I have a narrow trac. I just went out and measured and I had 46 inches flange to flange and roughly 52 something wms to wms. Its tough to measure by myself with the wheels still on.
62galaxie is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 10-19-2009, 06:04 PM   #18
jcal73
Web Wheeler
 
jcal73's Avatar
1979 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alabama Roll Tide
Posts: 1,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by jscherb View Post
You should be able to do it without measuring - if the front top shock mounts are the same as the rear top shock mounts, it is almost certainly NT. The WT axles use the taller front shock mounts. Just look under the front fender and you should see the shock mounts. Here's a photo of a frame set up for WT axles, notice the difference between the front and rear shock mounts. If the fronts are short ones similar to the height of the rears on this frame, then it's probably NT.



It is my understanding that all CJ-5's were build with NT axles. It would always be possible that Jeep could have run out of NT axles and substituted WT axles at the end of the production run, but given the publicity and controversy at the time about the CJ-5's stability, I'd find it hard to believe that Jeep would have made any changes to the suspension in the last production year. Making that change would have been like an admission that the CJ-5 was unstable and could have been used against them in lawsuits.

But with Jeep, anything is possible Never say never about anything "standard" Jeep.
True! My 5 is narrow track, but has the tall front shock mounts.

The bottom shock mounts on the front are on the axle not the spring plate.

But my 5 is assembled from parts. I think I have an 82or3 frame and front axle, 79 tub, and a 78 rear. Go Figure!
jcal73 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.