4.2 high output,,build input needed - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep CJ Forum > 4.2 high output,,build input needed

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineToxic Brakes - 3000 PSI Braided Stainless Steel Brake LineCess Recovery Gear Snatch Tow Strap OffRoad @ ROCKRIDGE4WD

Reply
Unread 09-09-2009, 07:23 AM   #1
xjandyj
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: u.s.
Posts: 375
4.2 high output,,build input needed

i figured i'd ask you cj guys as you will know more about the 258's.....when i replace my yj motor (92 242) in the future..i dont want to go stroker..so would it be better to just do a usual 4.0,,or get a 258, and put the 4.0 or better cam,and 4.0 head/intake etc on a 258 short block.

So,,,,i know a lot of you have done the 4.0 head swap,,but a cam,efi also,,and if so,,is the longer strok and few more cubic inches noticable over a stock 4.0 h.o............thanks

xjandyj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-09-2009, 08:45 AM   #2
swatson454
Mall-crawlin' Hot Rodder
 
swatson454's Avatar
1983 CJ7 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Dripping Springs, TX (soon)
Posts: 4,729
Cubic inches are always better as long as you can feed them. Heads are almost always the bottle neck and unfortunately are usually left alone. If you know how or can sub it to a competent machine shop I'd definitely go with the 4.0 head and have the valve bowls blended paying attention to the short-turn radius (where the port floor rolls down into the valve seat) and the long side radius along the intake valve for improved swirl. Depending on fit, you may want to match the ports to the intake.

If you can then find a cam with a fairly short duration but as much lift as possible and hopefully ground on something tighter than a 110 LCA, pair that up with a correctly done exhaust, re-curve the centrifugal advance on the dizzy and use a CDI ignition you'll probably be a pretty happy Jeeper. Does anyone make high-ratio rocker arms for the 4.0 head?

You weren't specific about your intended use or power range for the new engine, though.
swatson454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.