4.0 with T5 - issues with thinner flywheel - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 4 Old 06-06-2014, 01:43 PM Thread Starter
1984Laredo
Registered User
1984 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 292
4.0 with T5 - issues with thinner flywheel

I've read a few things about the 4.0 flywheel being 1/4" thinner than a 258 flywheel, which could cause issues with clutch disengagement (clutch fork running out of room, along with the throwout bearing being close to coming off the fork because of the increased throw). I know Skerr went through an ordeal and had to drill, tap, and install an adjustable pivot (and weld trusses to strengthen that area around it).

With all of the 4.0 swaps that have been done, I haven't seen much published about these issues when used with the T5, T4, T176, etc. Does this commonly cause an issue with a 4.0 swap?

I'm trying to avoid any issues by making the necessary modifications before I put everything in - cuz once I do, I will not be taking it back out anytime soon (hopefully!)

So my question is what modifications, if any, do I need to do? The pivot mod like Skerr (if so, use a pivot from what vehicle?)? I've seen the adjustable throwout bearing that Novak sells, which would easily solve the issue. Problem is, they are still in production.

Not sure what I need to do for this.


1984 CJ7 Laredo
4.0 I-6 / T5 / D300 / D30 / D44
Black Diamond 3" lift, 33" tires, 4.11 gears
1984Laredo is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 4 Old 06-06-2014, 02:19 PM
SLO_Ken
Registered User
1986 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: California
Posts: 1,025
This exact discussion was recently had on another thread. Not sure what the resolution was, but there may be some helpful info there...
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f8/ca...l#post23024009

Good luck, and keep us posted on what you decide.

California 4.0 OBDII Engine Swap
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f8/california-4-0-obdii-swap-1530716/
SLO_Ken is offline  
post #3 of 4 Old 06-07-2014, 07:48 AM
Mike Romain
Registered User
1986 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Off the Grid in Chester Grant
Posts: 18,090
The gent on the other thread had no issues. I used the 258 flywheel on my swap, so had no problems.

I haven't seen any threads where this was an issue. My YJ 258 now has the 4.0 with the 4.0 flywheel and its slave cylinder still reaches fine. It shifts great anyway.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG AT's, 'glass nose to tail in '00, 'New' frame,wires and plumbing in '09. Carter BBD Carbed 4.0 HO in '10.
89 YJ Renegade. BBD Carbed 4.0 HO. Locked front and rear with 33x9.5 BFG AT's
Some Canadian Bush Jeep Runs and Build Photos: http://mikeromainjeeptrips.shutterfly.com (10 new albums added Sept 16/10)
Mike Romain is offline  
post #4 of 4 Old 06-07-2014, 09:01 AM
RenoF250
Registered User
1985 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Foresthill
Posts: 2,583
I went from a 258 in front of an AX-15 to a 4.0 and did not notice a difference. I did not measure but the flywheels appear to be the same thickness.
RenoF250 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome