Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Kelowna, BC, Canada
I have already shown the flaws of carbon dating, and dinosaur fossils, and how they dont prove the earth is billions of years old, so please show me a better example of proof.
You tell me science prooves that because me see that certain animals are related that prooves evolution happened, and I say the opposite, it prooves creation happened. From your point of view, and what the secular world wants to teach us is that because I share a simular bone structure, brain functions, and other things of an ape, because we are more advanced, we must have come from apes, ureka! Evolution!
So lets use that in other examples. I see the first ford ever built, and then I see a new Jeep in a show room, they have 4 wheels each, a motor, a horn, but the new jeep is far more advance, wow, through time that old ford must have evolved by itself into a jeep. But we know thats not how it is. Through years of creation, we have developed better vehicles, not some majic force. Lets also look at a new dodge caliber, and jeep compass. We can say they are related because they share a chassis, and many other parts, would you say thats evolution, or a designer who designed one also designed another, and used some of the same parts for both.
This is exactly how evolution is flawed because it see 2 items close to the same, but one is more advanced, it must be evolution, and not another possibility. Does it not make sense that if you or I desgned many creatures on earth, we would not use simular items in the creatures. We dont go re-inventing the wheel every time we make a new car do we, no, we use what we know works, and improve on it as we go, as any good designer would do.