Jan 30 -- Mythbusters vs. Plane on a Treadmill (finally!) - Page 7 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General > General Discussion > Jan 30 -- Mythbusters vs. Plane on a Treadmill (finally!)

JK Front Lower Adjustable Control Arms!QTP Low Profile Cutouts Now @ MarylandSpeed- Free ShippingOPTIC ARMOR WINDOWS all sale now !!!!!!!!

Reply
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:33 PM   #91
CHRRRIS
Registered User
1997 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by opiv
The plane will take off and then get stuck on the handles... the treadmill wins...
You said it yourself, the plane will take off.. So technically....... I win.

__________________
It's easier to go down a hill than up it but the view is much better at the top.
-Henry Ward Beecher

Current - '98 Black Z28 with some goodies
Previous - '97 Gun Metal Blue TJ

Northern Illinois Extreme Jeep Club
www.ExtremeJeepClub.com
CHRRRIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:34 PM   #92
dz1087
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,749
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyoseki
Ah! But nobody said the treadmill had a catapult! *stir*



I don't think the Doolittle Raiders had catapults either...

I was simply pointing out that we use the physics (somewhat) of the treadmill problem everyday to launch aircraft from carriers.
__________________

Air Force Jeep Club - Tail# JF037AD
'03 TJ Sport, Black on White, Stock. [[Gone]]
'99 XJ, Purple, Stock but with new wheels.

Running Doorless? Check your state's Mirror Laws!!
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f176/list-state-mirror-laws-565361/

There can be no fifty-fifty Americanism in this country. There is room here for only 100% Americanism, only for those who are Americans and nothing else.
Theodore Roosevelt
dz1087 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:37 PM   #93
SomeGuysName
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyoseki
I can see where you're coming from, but if you're talking linear speed of the wheel then effectively you're talking about the forward velocity of the aircraft though.
Exactly...the linear speed of the wheel will always match the forward speed of the plane.

Either way, we all know in the spirit of this myth that they mean linear speed since rotational speed would break the question, so I would accept either question.
SomeGuysName is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:38 PM   #94
pyro9862
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 1,532
I understand perfectly where the plane takes off argument comes from. The propulsion does not come from the wheels. However the wheels need to spin for the plane to move forward right? The treadmill matches the speed of the plane correct? So as the plane tries to accelerate the treadmill speeds up. The plane tries to accelerate more, and the treadmill speeds up. Within seconds what you have is both the treadmill and wheels infinatly accelerating each trying to overcome the other.

So the real answer to the question, within seconds the tires are spinning at thousands of miles per hour since the entire thrust of those motors is doing nothing but spinning them. The tires catch fire, shred, or do something not good, the plane falls onto the convener belt and gets launched backwards at about 2000mph and you get a cool looking fireball.
pyro9862 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:42 PM   #95
SomeGuysName
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by pyro9862
I understand perfectly where the plane takes off argument comes from. The propulsion does not come from the wheels. However the wheels need to spin for the plane to move forward right?
No....it doesnt even need wheels...skis work just fine in lots of cases...
SomeGuysName is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:46 PM   #96
Kyoseki
Inconceivable!
 
Kyoseki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 6,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by SomeGuysName
Either way, we all know in the spirit of this myth that they mean linear speed since rotational speed would break the question, so I would accept either question.
Certainly in the classic problem, the question is about linear speed, but lecturers will tend to reword questions to see if you're paying attention, so it's important to answer the question that was actually asked instead of the one that's usually asked.
__________________
Due to lack of interest, tomorrow has been canceled
Kyoseki is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 06:49 PM   #97
SomeGuysName
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyoseki
Certainly in the classic problem, the question is about linear speed, but lecturers will tend to reword questions to see if you're paying attention, so it's important to answer the question that was actually asked instead of the one that's usually asked.
Yeah I know...that's just something I've heard them say when wording can come into play on a myth: "In the spirit of the myth blah blah blah" Yes, my humor skills suck...
SomeGuysName is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 07:23 PM   #98
PhilipJ
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Posts: 1,406
I don't recall asking anyone whether they thought the plane would take off or not. I was just giving heads up for the show. There's plenty of other threads to be retarded in. <>
__________________
Build n' stuff: http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f177/99-sport-build-thread-grocery-haulin-panache-1179209/

Cherokee Of The Month Winnar! - September 2012
PhilipJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 10:08 PM   #99
BS87
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 228
Quote:
Originally Posted by dz1087


Is that what I think it is, why it is! That is indeed a wake behind that boat, which means it's moving. Now, it seems to be moving in the same direction that the Hawkeye appears to be setup to take-off in. That would be almost the opposite to the argument presented here! Does the Navy know they can't possibly launch that plane cause it won't take off?

NO! Since both the ship AND plane will be moving forwards, it will break the speed of LIGHT upon launch and transport into the future (or past).
BS87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 10:39 PM   #100
Indy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WY
Posts: 2,611

__________________
Odds are im typing on a tablet. It takes too much effort to add some punctuation. Im lazy, get over it

Never underestimate the power of stupid.
Indy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 10:42 PM   #101
Indy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: WY
Posts: 2,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by pyro9862
I understand perfectly where the plane takes off argument comes from. The propulsion does not come from the wheels. However the wheels need to spin for the plane to move forward right? The treadmill matches the speed of the plane correct? So as the plane tries to accelerate the treadmill speeds up. The plane tries to accelerate more, and the treadmill speeds up. Within seconds what you have is both the treadmill and wheels infinatly accelerating each trying to overcome the other.

So the real answer to the question, within seconds the tires are spinning at thousands of miles per hour since the entire thrust of those motors is doing nothing but spinning them. The tires catch fire, shred, or do something not good, the plane falls onto the convener belt and gets launched backwards at about 2000mph and you get a cool looking fireball.
I guess it just can't be said enough...
freewheel
freewheel
freewheel
freewheel
freewheel
freewheel
freewheel
The wheels can spin until they explode, but since they're not tied to the object, they won't effect it.
__________________
Odds are im typing on a tablet. It takes too much effort to add some punctuation. Im lazy, get over it

Never underestimate the power of stupid.
Indy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-22-2008, 11:19 PM   #102
Kyoseki
Inconceivable!
 
Kyoseki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: A wretched hive of scum and villainy
Posts: 6,179
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philip J Fry
I don't recall asking anyone whether they thought the plane would take off or not. I was just giving heads up for the show. There's plenty of other threads to be retarded in. <>
It was implied
__________________
Due to lack of interest, tomorrow has been canceled
Kyoseki is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2008, 12:29 AM   #103
MattTheMudder
Ask Mr. Owl
 
MattTheMudder's Avatar
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,843
That depends... What color is the plane?
__________________
Me fail English? That's unpossible
MattTheMudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2008, 06:30 AM   #104
opiv
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: ny
Posts: 1,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattTheMudder
That depends... What color is the plane?
and will peanuts be served?
It will take off but be about an hour late if they do the experiment at LaGuardia airport.
__________________
Get me my tools and beer.
opiv is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-23-2008, 08:48 AM   #105
Whybu1
Lets go Penguins!!!!
 
Whybu1's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 3,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by BS87
NO! Since both the ship AND plane will be moving forwards, it will break the speed of LIGHT upon launch and transport into the future (or past).

The carrier turns INTO the wind and goes to full speed to increse the wind speed over the wings of the aircraft. If they turned with the wind and went to full speed it is entirely possible the aircraft would not have sufficient lift to remain airborne at the end of the deck.

The propeller on planes generates forward movement (thrust) which in turn provides airspeed over the wings resulting in lift. The propeller alone does not generate enough air to provide lift. If you take away airflow over the wings the plane remains grounded.

Now, if you have enough thrust and you can ignore lift then anything can fly (ie rockets). So it is possible (esp with lightweight remote control aircraft) to use thrust rather than lift to "fly".
Whybu1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.