Huckabee/Obama win Iowa - Page 6 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General > General Discussion > Huckabee/Obama win Iowa

FLASH SALE! Open thread to reveil the Newest Sale @ ROCKRIFS: Wranger BRIGHT License Plate LED! Just $3! Great valuePremium LED Lighting by VISION X, Proudly sold at ROCKRIDG

View Poll Results: who are you gonna vote for
Obama 11 15.71%
Huckabee 30 42.86%
other 26 37.14%
no one 3 4.29%
Voters: 70. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Unread 01-05-2008, 06:52 AM   #76
trob09
Senior Member
 
trob09's Avatar
2014 WK 
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: north of most people
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by kiksroks
that is the type of lawsuit that i am referring to and it happens everyday in the medical industry. All of the players are insured from the mega drug companies to the local dentist. every time a claim is payed the rates go up and the only thing the players can do is raise prices to cover the overhead. that's the biggest reason drug prices get out of hand. that's mainly why surgeries cost so much.
When most of us talk about health care reform, this is one of the major items we are looking to reform - tort laws. Another thing is to take the care decision out of the hands of the accountants at the health insurance companies and put it back into the hands of the doctor/hospital/provider. yet another thing is to demand that the pharma companies -seriously- test the products they market (Vioxx anyone?)

Unfortunately, insurance and Big Pharma use (effective) scare tactics to create the illusion that health care reform means 50's era soviet socialism applied to a government provided national health care.

As for privatization, yeah, it worked so well for the airline industry, energy, rail transport, etc.

trob09 is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-05-2008, 07:45 AM   #77
Elwood
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cornjerker Country, IL.
Posts: 1,477
The fact is about our medicines, this is the only country that can afford to pay higher prices that fund the research and developement for new drugs. Other countries with socialized medicine pay a lot less for drugs that in reality are NOT the exact same drugs. They have a lot lower standards regarding the quality of the drugs.

The "seconds" or lower quality pills (rejects according to U.S. Drug Safety Laws) are sold to countries with socialized medicine.

I want the best care possible and will find the money some way to pay for it. Like someone said above, there are priorities in life and our society has gotten to the point that anything too expensive, they refuse to take responsibility for and expect the goverment to do it for them.

In the end, it is about people as much as it is about medical care and costs.
__________________
A quote from my wife: "I don't even want to know how much it cost, I'm not in the mood to be that pissed off today."
Elwood is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Unread 01-05-2008, 09:11 AM   #78
PJL
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Schenectady, NY
Posts: 1,350
A friend of mine who was a research scientist for Bristol Meyers-Squibb before going to law school tells me that a lot of rationale for higher costs in the USA are simply fabricated (I've heard the same thing about gas prices from a former oil company attorney - funny, isn't it?). Also, if Americans want drugs to be more effective, they should stop exposing themselves to all sorts of drugs and chemicals all the time. We have antimicrobial this, sterile that, drugs in our meat, chemicals in our produce, etc. etc. The United States consumes the most drugs in the world, both illegal and legal, and that's not per capita. So not only do we pay the most, but we also buy the most. This is why people in the US are developing "immune" strains of Strep throat whereas you bring a bottle of penicillin to any poor or indigenous village in the third world and you'll see almost miraculous results. And it's why the pharmaceutical drug companies lobby so hard for no price controls, because the US is a gold mine for them.

And HMOs are a completely different factor when you're talking about the practice of medicine v. the bottom line. At the end of December a story came out in LA about a girl who died of leukemia because her HMO denied her a liver transplant that had a 65% chance of saving her life. Only after the family staged a protest did the HMO finally fold, and then it was too late. The girl died a few hours after the HMO finally agreed to cover the cost, after weeks of denying coverage and ignoring her doctors when they informed the company of the need of the procedure to save her life. Also, some states, such as NY, make HMOs litigation-proof from denial of such coverage. So we have private sector health care, which in the private sector in the US everything is driven by profit motive, versus a system run by the government.

And let's talk about those people who can't work. My mother died at the age of 48. From the ages of 38-45, she suffered 4 heart attacks and a stroke. She also had several degenerating discs in her spine, two in her lumbar and one in her neck. For someone who is functionally immobile, work isn't really an option. So she had medicaid/medicare/whatever. I recently saw something on TV where an MMA fighter - one of the most physically demanding occupations on the planet - had a degenerating disc. They put a small plastic block in his back and within 24 months he was back fighting again. Now my mother, on the other hand, because she didn't have private insurance, would have to go the emergency room virtually every week for pain management, get treated like a drug seeker, be subject to rudimentary surgical procedures that did almost nothing in the long run to resolve her pain, get denied further surgical procedures to correct problems and complications she'd develop after her original surgeries, and then spent the last 3 or so years of her life virtually crippled, having to get around with a cane or a walker. I can't help but think that if she had private insurance or hadn't had to rely on public health coverage, that she would've been treated better, would've got the care and been able to at least been eligible for treatments that would've actually improved her life, instead of leaving her dead before the age of 50. That's what I think about every time talk of Universal Health Care is talked about. Do I necessarily think it will work? No. Does what we have now work? No. HMOs suddenly popped up in the 70s and were given all the power in the world by Congress and eventually snaked their way into every decision hospitals, primary care physicians, and specialists make. I think it's silly to argue that a government run system would be any more driven by the "bottom line" than the current system, where private companies are allowed to play shell games and place Vegas odds on our lives. So we either go the Ron Paul route and get the power away from HMOs and give people tax breaks for health coverage expenses, so that people can start to afford health care without having to implement universal health care, or we start to move towards a more socialist system. If it's truly about people, then in a field such as medicine, people should come before profit. That's why I don't completely believe that a market (read: profit) driven system in medicine necessarily works.

By the way, you guys who talk about lack of research or whatever... Consider that the socialist French researched and discovered the HIV virus and the test for HIV contemporaneously with American researchers. We're not the only country in the world that performs medical research. Whether it's through corporate profit motive or government grant, medical research will still get done.

Last edited by PJL; 01-05-2008 at 09:35 AM..
PJL is offline   Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.
Note: All free e-mails have been banned due to mis-use. (Yahoo, Gmail, Hotmail, etc.)
Don't have a non-free e-mail address? Click here for a solution: Manual Account Creation
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.


Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.