2016 wrangler independent suspension?! - Page 4 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General > General Discussion > 2016 wrangler independent suspension?!

FS: Wrangler RGB Multicolor Fog Light LEDs: Awesome EffectJKS Now Available at www.baseline4x4.com, Trackbars, SkidsFS: 2007-2013 Jeep Wrangler "HALO" Angel Eye Kit

Reply
Unread 11-05-2013, 06:25 AM   #46
nwiTJdave
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,527
What weighs more, a 1950's all steel frame and body car or a newer car with a plastic and sheet metal body?

Google search 59 Bel Air Vs 09 Malibu.

Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App

__________________
www.militaryjeepers.com

This is for fighting, this is for fun.
nwiTJdave is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-05-2013, 06:46 AM   #47
prjohnson
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 564
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicMC View Post
I don't know about you, but I personally weigh 150lbs. It doesn't matter what car I'm in, the thing has no idea I'm driving it. If you tried to trim 30 pounds in driver weight from me, I'd probably be dead.
I think you were missing my point. You're not obese. Say your weight jumped up to 400 pounds. Do you think you'd get the same mileage? Even if it's a fraction of a difference, multiply that by the number of overweight people driving in the world....Now look at the next generation of children coming up. A quick search (could be inaccurate) says that around 35% of adults & 32% of children are overweight. That IMHO is the real weight issue, not an axle that has a weight difference of 200 pounds compared to IFS. - That last comment, I'm unsure about the weight difference.
prjohnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-05-2013, 10:28 AM   #48
HOKIES2010
Web Wheeler
 
HOKIES2010's Avatar
2011 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Navarre Beach, FL
Posts: 1,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyder6 View Post
Mine does
Man im at 5400lbs at the moment. That is with the hard top and doors. Havent had the chance to run that through the scale yet with just the soft top on. Just got lucky I had to make a run to the dump while I was back in the states on leave. The moment I get home that hard top goes right back into the garage.
__________________
HOKIES2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 11-05-2013, 11:30 AM   #49
SchizophrenicMC
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arlington, Texas
Posts: 2,440
Quote:
Originally Posted by nwiTJdave View Post
What weighs more, a 1950's all steel frame and body car or a newer car with a plastic and sheet metal body?

Google search 59 Bel Air Vs 09 Malibu.

Sent from AutoGuide.com Free App
The Bel Air is somewhat heavier, but it's also a physically larger vehicle. The Malibu is barely a midsize sedan, whereas the Bel Air was a full-size sedan in its time, and larger than most modern cars. It's hardly an apt comparison.

It's also notable that most cars today have little in the way of plastic bodywork.

Cars are down from their enormous weights in the 50s, but they're up from their downward peak in the early 90s. Again, this is because of increasingly strict DOT regulations requiring various safety structures and devices. One regulation spells a lot of it out: there's a minimum airspace requirement between the engine and the hood of a car now. Because engines can only be made so short, the hood has to be raised to clear it by so much. Since the hood is now taller, the seat has to be raised to see over it. Since the seat is higher, the roof is raised so people can drive the thing without their heads poking out of the car. Now it's a very tall, weird-looking thing, so they stretch it a bit in length and width to make it look proportionate again. Then they put bigger wheels on so it looks like a proper-sized car instead of a behemoth on 15" wheels. All this makes the car heavier and it also presents a bigger frontal surface area, so a bigger engine and stronger transmission are required to move it, and those add weight. And then the EPA is pushing for tighter emissions and fuel economy rules, a la the CAFE act of 1975, so the left and right hands aren't talking to each other and the carmakers are in the crossfire.

Now, I'm all for improved safety, and my wallet really likes better fuel economy, so I'm okay with these laws. I'm just saying it's a big engineering challenge to make both of them congruous and cars today are heavier than 15 or 20 years ago because of these regulations. There's evidence we've hit the upper peak because cars are now shedding pounds again. If the Wrangler wants to lose weight, an independent front suspension might be a viable way to do it. A definite way to cut some weight would be to employ a unibody design. More plastic bodywork would also drop a few pounds. For that matter, a fixed roof and windshield would definitely weigh less than the current setup because they could provide chassis rigidity without needing further reinforcement. Dropping the tire size would make for a huge improvement in mass, and ditching the full-size spare on the back would also help.

Of course, Jeep isn't considering any of those. The only one that's even been hinted is the IFS. Even that isn't set in stone, or even at all evident of the brand's direction.
__________________
1997 Grand Cherokee Orvis Edition

Because tacky green leather is SUPER COOL
SchizophrenicMC is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.