DOM weldable surface area question - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 08:07 AM Thread Starter
TXST8tj
Registered User
 
TXST8tj's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 3,401
DOM weldable surface area question

Making control arms.

1.5" OD tube
1.5" joint housing width

Is there enough surface area to weld the two pieces together? Considering the joint housing staying the same 1.5", should the tubing be dropped down to 1" OD, or is the 1.5" on 1.5" ok?

A CAD illustration:




TXST8tj is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 08:37 AM
Danno6102
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,572
Grind a bevel around the side of the arm tube to give you a pocket for the weld.

What joints are you using in those? That's a small ID. (if drawn to scale)

IndyORV
My Build

"Evolution through carnage, the Jeep will keep what it needs."
Danno6102 is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 08:49 AM Thread Starter
TXST8tj
Registered User
 
TXST8tj's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 3,401
Haha. Definitely not drawn to scale. It's what I'm good for in MS Paint.

Using Metal Cloak Joints.
TXST8tj is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 08:53 AM
Danno6102
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by TXST8tj View Post
Haha. Definitely not drawn to scale. It's what I'm good for in MS Paint.

Using Metal Cloak Joints.
thought the narrowest one was 2".

they have a snap ring groove around them, id' be careful about burning into this groove. The snap ring won't fully seat.

IndyORV
My Build

"Evolution through carnage, the Jeep will keep what it needs."
Danno6102 is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 09:05 AM Thread Starter
TXST8tj
Registered User
 
TXST8tj's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 3,401
These are the 2.25" diameter, 2" joints. The joint housing width is 1.5". The joint itself is 2".



TXST8tj is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 09:13 AM
Danno6102
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,572
Brain fart. 2" mounting width. Durrrr.

I assume with 2" joints these are for uppers. You'd be fine with smaller tube. Currie uses 1"x.156" wall DOM on all their arms, upper & lower. But if it were me, I'd still use the 1.5" on the lowers, they're wider & shouldn't have a problem.

IndyORV
My Build

"Evolution through carnage, the Jeep will keep what it needs."
Danno6102 is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 11-15-2013, 09:22 AM Thread Starter
TXST8tj
Registered User
 
TXST8tj's Avatar
2001 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 3,401
Yes, these are for the rear uppers. I bought the joints a while ago when I was looking for projects to do. Ironically, I never got around to it, but it's time to do something with the parts. I will probably just buy them made from MC next time, but it seemed like a good project.
TXST8tj is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome