Keeping the front end "down"/hill climbs/Instant Center... - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General Technical Discussions > Advanced Jeep Tech > Keeping the front end "down"/hill climbs/Instant Center...

Stainless Steel Door Hinge PinsPoly Door Hinge BushingsFS: 2007-2013 Jeep Wrangler "HALO" Angel Eye Kit

Reply
Unread 12-19-2011, 01:05 PM   #16
ABQ-TJ
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 159
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ftgiles View Post
Did you read this /\
Yes I could Google it, I was hoping someone could explain it, though.

Nevermind.

and I didn't ask WHAT it is, I asked WHY it was called "instant" center...I get that it's the point where those two link would intersect, if extended. But what's the reason for the term?

__________________
[SIZE="4"][URL="http://www.nmoffroad.com/forumvb/content/"]New Mexico Offroad[/URL][/SIZE]

[SIZE="4"][URL="http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f22/abqtjs-2000-tj-build-1310472/"]My Jeep Build[/URL][/SIZE]

[SIZE="4"][URL="https://www.facebook.com/NMOffroad"]NMOffroad Facebook[/URL][/SIZE]
ABQ-TJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 02:03 PM   #17
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 19,247
It's called an instant center because at any instantaneous moment in time, it has a velocity of zero due to the rotation of the rest of the system taking place around it.
__________________
OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 02:16 PM   #18
ken white
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: painesville, ohio
Posts: 125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
It's called an instant center because at any instantaneous moment in time, it has a velocity of zero due to the rotation of the rest of the system taking place around it.
At a particular instant in time, not every instant in time, since it is dynamic.
ken white is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 02:54 PM   #19
ftgiles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,595
As opposed to "actual centers" that are not dynamic that exist when the frame pivot point is the same for both the upper and lower arms (no separation) or only has one pivot point at the frame like a radius arm.

Actual centers don't move when the suspension moves. Instant centers do move which ads a level of complexity when setting up your suspension. Do you set it up for hill climbing or flat ground? Or do you point the instant center out further to reduce the rate of change in anti-squat (undesirable percent decrease) because the instant center moves when your suspension sucks down in the rear when climbing a hill?

But then maybe your arms are too long to be able to get the instant center to fall on the percent anti-squat that you desire...
ftgiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 04:47 PM   #20
RaggedOleMan
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: , Sane's Ville
Posts: 2,339
Imped, thanks for taking the time to share your wisdom. I'm still reading & re-reading the links provided, as well as the posts you guys made. To help myself understand this better, I'm going to attempt to plot out my suspension on AutoCAD, and try to make practical sense of all the input you guys have provided. For me, the learning is often in the doing...thanks again.

~jL/OP
RaggedOleMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 06:47 PM   #21
pcoplin
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaggedOleMan View Post
To keep the front end "loaded" to maximize front end traction on an ascent, the IC should be on a plane below the actual COG "point" of the rig, in this instance & per your assertion, that the top of the bell housing (approximately) is the actual COG of a Jeep Tj, then some distance below that would be desirable to achieve my objective. Fair statement?

I added some more info to your post on PNWJeep that'll explain it better, but the gyst of it is the antisquat is based on the IC's relation to the antisquat line, NOT the CG point. The antisquat line is the uplsoping line going from the rear tire contact to the IC. The antisquat is calculated in comparison to the height of that line.
__________________
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
85 Wagoneer 5.2/44RE
01 F250 Powerstroke 7.3/ZF6
Ultra4 KOH #689 car
pcoplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 07:08 PM   #22
MayRoll
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Hollister, CA
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by Imped View Post
I'm going to do my best to keep the AS just a few points under 100% since my shocks counter squat (Bilsteins).
If you want to build that close to the AS line then the location of CoG seems critical. I've found that the the exact CoG location is reasonably forgiving when plugging in the numbers. But it would seem you have a pretty presice game plan.

I don't know if you've seen this. I plan to visit a local Hwy truck scale where a friend works. If you're going to adjust your links inorder to get that close to the AS line then fuel level, passenger weight even tool boxes and recovery gear will all play a factor.
__________________
First of the Breed
03 Khaki Rubi
JF short arm champ
MayRoll is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 07:19 PM   #23
RaggedOleMan
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: , Sane's Ville
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by pcoplin View Post
I added some more info to your post on PNWJeep that'll explain it better, but the gyst of it is the antisquat is based on the IC's relation to the antisquat line, NOT the CG point. The antisquat line is the uplsoping line going from the rear tire contact to the IC. The antisquat is calculated in comparison to the height of that line.
You must be "Paul", eh? You've been extremely helpful. Thanks a million, Paul. Hope we get to meet face to face to face some time...

~John
RaggedOleMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 07:21 PM   #24
GOLENJEEPTJ
Running Secretly Amok!
 
GOLENJEEPTJ's Avatar
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ventura ,CA., California
Posts: 9,674
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaggedOleMan View Post


Thanks, but...I can't make heads or tails out of the image you posted. I was under the impression, perhaps mistaken impression, that the "instant center" was an imaginary point somewhere in front of the rig. The extension of the control arm lines, similar to what your image illustrates, converge at a point in front of the rig, and that is the "instant center. But, I must be getting it wrong, based on the image you posted, eh?

Vertical separation between upper & lower CA's at the axle end as well as at the frame end play a role. While the image you provided seems to consider that, the IC, according to you is where the lines intersect. That's not making any sense to me. Am I hopelessly confused here or what?
Because he is a novice? He's young and I doubt very experienced other than what he has read!driving for maybe 2 years?
GOLENJEEPTJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 08:29 PM   #25
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 19,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by MayRoll View Post
If you want to build that close to the AS line then the location of CoG seems critical. I've found that the the exact CoG location is reasonably forgiving when plugging in the numbers. But it would seem you have a pretty presice game plan.
That was a thought early on in my suspension design days. I learned exactly what you're saying pretty quickly, hence why I suggested after my quote to shoot for 60-90 on the calc and leave room for adjustment so that you can dial it in by feel instead of just going by the estimations in the calculator. So, I can't tell you exactly where I'm at but it doesn't really matter. The suspension works flawlessly in all situations so far, including some very steep walls. No bouncing, no drama at all. It just grabs and goes and if there's not enough traction the tires just spin (as opposed to bouncing). If I were to guess, it'd be around 80% since there is a small amount of squat.

http://pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=168577

http://www.pirate4x4.com/forum/showthread.php?t=204893
__________________
OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 09:06 PM   #26
RaggedOleMan
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: , Sane's Ville
Posts: 2,339
It was dark by the time I got a chance to get started on this, as a result I rushed it a bit.That said the dimensions are a reasonable approximation. Is there enough information on this drawing to develop the AS percentage?
jeep-suspension-worksheet-jeep-2.jpg  
RaggedOleMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 09:28 PM   #27
Imped
Web Wheeler
 
Imped's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 19,247
Look at my link above. Input the same info into the Pirate link calculator. It's an Excel program that will give you all of the information you could ever need to know.
__________________
OlllllllO
Float Test Build
IndyORV
Imped is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 10:01 PM   #28
pcoplin
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 1,682
Divide your IC height of 21.8 by the height of the AS line directly below it. Pretty sure you'll need the calculator to get that.


Edit: Because your IC is above that line your AS is above 100%.
__________________
98 TJ 5.9/46RE/D300
85 Wagoneer 5.2/44RE
01 F250 Powerstroke 7.3/ZF6
Ultra4 KOH #689 car
pcoplin is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 10:30 PM   #29
ftgiles
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaggedOleMan View Post
It was dark by the time I got a chance to get started on this, as a result I rushed it a bit.That said the dimensions are a reasonable approximation. Is there enough information on this drawing to develop the AS percentage?
Your cog is not that far forward. The "cog height" looks reasonable, but the cog is closer to the middle of the car.

The 100% anti-squat line goes from the rear tire contact patch and intersects the "cog height" at a point on a line that is vertical from the center of the front wheel. So the anti-squat line you're showing is too steep.


ftgiles is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 12-19-2011, 10:34 PM   #30
RaggedOleMan
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: , Sane's Ville
Posts: 2,339
Quote:
Originally Posted by ftgiles View Post
Your cog is not that far forward. The "cog height" looks reasonable, but the cog is closer to the middle of the car.

The 100% anti-squat line goes from the rear tire contact patch and intersects the "cog height" at a point on a line that is vertical from the center of the front wheel. So the anti-squat line you're showing is too steep.
Yes, as I've been looking at my drawing, I suspected that the COG I pinpointed was to far forward. I'll re-measure tomorrow in the day light, and revise the drawing. Thanks FTGiles & Paul...
RaggedOleMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.