WJ or WK - Page 3 - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #31 of 35 Old 07-16-2013, 11:27 AM
alfaitalia
CRD Pilot!
 
alfaitalia's Avatar
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bognor
Posts: 5,739
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdkendrick View Post

I saw a little more than 435,000 before my engine went in my '91 Cherokee Laredo.

Sent from my iPad using Forum Runner
Impressive....don't think I have ever seen any car with that many miles on!


If you can't fix it with a hammer, you've got yourself an electrical problem!
alfaitalia is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #32 of 35 Old 07-16-2013, 01:10 PM
brouwmat
Registered User
2002 WJ 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Sioux Falls
Posts: 1,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by rdkendrick View Post

I saw a little more than 435,000 before my engine went in my '91 Cherokee Laredo.

Sent from my iPad using Forum Runner
Darn good engine.. That is the reason I wanted the 4.0. Stories like this are fairly common..
brouwmat is offline  
post #33 of 35 Old 07-17-2013, 12:22 AM
elcorvino
Registered User
2003 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 1,243
I bought my 2003 4.0 because I had 4 different mechanics tell me they last for ever and replacement parts are relatively cheap. 55K miles in 2 years and 15 more to 200K and so far it's been true.
elcorvino is offline  
post #34 of 35 Old 07-17-2013, 11:21 AM
bowhunter69
Registered User
2004 WJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: wilmington
Posts: 44
I had a 96 grand Cherokee with a 4.0 that went 300k before I just gave it away to a kid..but I love my 4.7 HO in my Overland 04...
bowhunter69 is offline  
post #35 of 35 Old 07-17-2013, 04:53 PM
Schlotzky
Registered User
2007 XK Commander 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Auburn
Posts: 961
The WK is certainly a bit more refined, and has more of a "new car" feel. I personally prefer the more high-end-90s-American feel of the WJ to the WK. The real deciding factor for me though, was the incomparable looks.

Since it's generally agreed that both the I6 and V8 are good engines, it's a matter of preference. They both get the same mileage and cost the same these days, so the extra power was a no-brainer for me. However, between the 4.7L HO and 4.7L, I didn't feel a justifiable difference in power to make the much-less-common HO worth holding out for. So in my opinion, if you find the perfect Jeep for you with a HO, go for it, but don't make the standard 4.7L a deal-breaker. I'm very happy with my standard 4.7L and its torquey low-end. In my test drives, the I6 took all the fun out of the WJ.
Schlotzky is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome