IRO 6.5" lift or claytons 6"?
Any bad news on either? Do you have one of the lifts? Please reply!
Here we go... :teehee:
Clayton's is superior, but bottom line is that you can't really go wrong with either.
The main reason Clayton is superior is the incorporation of a subframe, which when dealing with a unibody vehicle, its value cannot be understated. The adjustability of Clayton's is also superior to IRO considering IRO continues to use that hokey caster adjustment bracket. I also prefer the rear 4 link design of Clayton's versus IRO's retention of the a-arm design.
Square vs. round is a never-ending debate, and if you're really concerned about that issue, head over to Pirate for some good reading.
Haha, but yeah that makes sense. Thanks for the input.
|The time now is 04:58 PM.|
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.