Who's logged 10K trouble free miles? - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #16 of 122 Old 07-15-2012, 08:28 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
2001 TJ Wrangler 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: flemington
Posts: 137
4) MPG for hybrids does not include cost of plugging in. Even so for a Hybrid to make sense it should have about a 1,000 cc (1 liter) TD and use the batteries more as a big capacitor for starting and hills. Then a 3,000 lb full sized hybrid would be possible (not even a Prius is under 3,000 lbs)

The Volvo is said to go 35 miles on a charge. My wife works 10 miles from the house. Seems like a no brainier to me ('cept for the boat part of course)

2001 TJ 4.0 auto
ourlee is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #17 of 122 Old 07-15-2012, 08:44 PM
Jackal01's Avatar
2011 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,276
10500 miles, two oil changes, no issues. 4x4 shop busted an ABS sensor during the lift install and the stealership replaced it but not Jeep's fault. Love my WK2.

2011 Billet JKUS

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

Jackal01 is offline  
post #18 of 122 Old 07-15-2012, 09:08 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Suburbs
Posts: 51
Originally Posted by padgett View Post
2) if it meets US pollution requirements and gets about 10 more MPG than a HEMI, please explain how there is more pollution ?
MPG isn't everything; it has to do with how cleanly the engine burns the fuel it's given, and how cleanly a particular fuel is able to be burned. For example you might have a car that runs on coal (ha) that gets 100MPG but that doesn't necessarily mean it's cleaner than a car that runs on gasoline that gets only 25MPG, as coal is a very "dirty" fuel.

Mind you, I haven't researched this in depth, and I could be wrong, but I thought I remembered reading that while today's diesels are indeed way, way cleaner than those of yesteryear, the exhaust is still more polluting than gasoline exhaust. Again -- could be totally wrong about this. And if I'm not, it could very well be that the increase in efficiency of diesel engines offsets the greater amount of pollution...
TooGoodToBeTrue is offline  
post #19 of 122 Old 07-16-2012, 06:43 AM
Registered User
2012 WK 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Morristown
Posts: 203
Originally Posted by TooGoodToBeTrue View Post
MPG may be higher on diesels, however correct me if I'm wrong but I believe they emit more harmful pollutants overall than gasoline powered engines. Again, could be totally wrong about this... on the other hand, I think diesel fuel is safer in a crash due to its higher flash point. But I could be wrong about this also.
The new clean diesel engines are far less harmful. Diesel fuel is cheaper to produce but taxed higher because it is used by trucks which damage the highways. Thus the higher tax on fuel.

I would like to see a lot more clean diesel cars in the US. Our VW gets 44 mpg!
JeepJeep2012 is offline  
post #20 of 122 Old 07-16-2012, 06:52 AM
My Reality Check Bounced
ColdCase's Avatar
2011 WK 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: New England
Posts: 10,007
Yes diesels throw the more dangerous particulates into the air where gas engines do not. One of the reasons car diesels are so expensive has it takes high tech to reduce the particulates to what someone thinks is an acceptable number, and being a political thing, every government has a different idea what is acceptable (i.e. who gets payed off or not). Diesels have been popular in europe and less developed countries as they can run on a wide variety of crud, where gas engines are temperamental. The added pollution there not being as big an issue as industrial growth. Diesel engines have come a long way the past decade, however.

So it doesn't mater how many mpg a diesel gets in relation to a gas engine, it will still make dangerous particulates.
ColdCase is offline  
post #21 of 122 Old 07-16-2012, 07:14 AM
Registered User
2012 WK 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: orlando
Posts: 582
Didn't think it necessary to say we were comparing only petrolium products at this point. If you just want green then E100 is the way to go and E85 is close. No pollutants atol. If you really want green then bring back external combustion engines.

What bothers me is people (not TooGood) who make blanket statements about things they know very little about. For example if a vehicle meets LEV II SULEV emissions does it really matter what the powerplant is running on ? OTOH if a vehicle says "not for sale in Califonia" then we should wonder.

Note that the LEV standards are for vehicle class and suspect any WK2 would be come under "All PCs, LDTs ≤ 8500 lbs GVWa, & All MDPVs". I would suggest waiiting to see where a diesel ranks before making a blanket statement about pollution, both Mercedes and VW diesels can meet ULEV requirements. There are two different methods for doing this and only one needs bio-byproducts.

Sorry if this has gotten too technical & off topic but warrented more than "That's right, you're wrong".

One of these is a turbo diesel.

We take in orphans. Notary Sojac y'all.
padgett is offline  
post #22 of 122 Old 07-16-2012, 07:42 AM
Web Wheeler
Timo_90xj's Avatar
1998 ZJ 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Helsinki, Finland - on the European side of the Atlantic
Posts: 8,569
Originally Posted by MoparCharlie View Post
I would strongly suggest you do NOT get a diesel.

At this point they are diffintly not a common choice.
Dunno of the parts availability in the USA for the diesels, but here across the ocean I would say that probably at least ~75% of the new GCs sold are diesels. With the gas prices and environment taxes on the gas engines (Hemi, mainly) there really is very low interest in gas engines.

Of what I've heard so far over here, people have been mostly happy with their diesel WK2s.

1998 Grand Cherokee 5.9 LX daily driver, 1.75" BB, 32" KM2s, HPD30 Eaton e-locker/D44a stock LSD, 4.56 gears, custom- fabbed tube bumpers and tube fenders,...

To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 10 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.

1990 XJ Limited (4-door), 4.0 I6, AW4, NP242, ***rolled and totalled @ 165k miles***

***Under construction***
1990 XJ (4-door), 4.0 I6, AW4, NP242, PBR 42" tires, Unimog 404 portal axles, 110" WB, full cage + uniframe completely rebuilt, front 3-link + panhard / double triangulated 4-link rear,... ***SOLD***
Timo_90xj is offline  
post #23 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 02:30 AM
Registered User
2011 WK 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 72
Originally Posted by pinky2252s

Chrysler owns Jeep, Dodge, Mopar.... Well technically Fiat owns Daimler-Chrysler.

Your Jeep is built by Dodge. Which is built by Chrysler, which is built by Fiat.

Your Jeep is a Fiat.
1. When Chrysler was sold to Fiat the "Daimler" was dropped (part of the Mercedes-Benz group which is why the GC was built on the ML platform)
2. The Fiat group also produce Ferrari , Maserati & Alfa Romeo (as well as Fiat of course!) hence the interior Euro styling on the new 300.

Global cars, part and even model sharing is here to stay, like it or not.
Wk2downunder is offline  
post #24 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 09:32 AM
Registered User
2011 WK 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Riverside
Posts: 133
Been to the dealer about 5 times in 14,000 miles. First time was at 4,000 and was in the shop for a week while they dismantled the pentastar to replace some faulty "phase timers." Everything else has been for non mechanical problems like faulty rubber, leaking tail lights, bubbling chrome on the back, a wheel well that developed hole, a door that had something rattling inside.
Iamnid is offline  
post #25 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 09:57 AM
Junior Member
2001 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Redding
Posts: 87
13423 miles. No issues. Two 1500+ miles trips. Love my wk2.
LS1_DOC is offline  
post #26 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 10:24 AM
Registered User
2016 JK Wrangler 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hurricane
Posts: 337
11,000+ Miles, 2 oil changes - only problem was uneven tire wear on fronts. Alignment covered under warranty.

JKUR - Bone stock (for now).
2MchFun is offline  
post #27 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 11:04 AM
Registered User
2011 WK 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Javelina
Posts: 155
I'm at about 9600 miles, so far I'm very pleased. Excellent vehicle for long road trips.

2011 Grand Cherokee Laredo 4X4
3.6L V-6 with Selec-Terrain
Off-Road Adventure package
Tow package
steveinaz is offline  
post #28 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 11:10 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 14
18,000 on 2012 V6 Overland and not one issue.
jno34 is offline  
post #29 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 11:50 AM
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 280
I have 21K trouble free miles.

Not to say the Jeep is perfect, it is far from it but nothing has broke yet.

I love the guy trying to be green while towing his boat around - that's funny stuff.
77rednecktruck is offline  
post #30 of 122 Old 07-17-2012, 08:53 PM
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: St Charles
Posts: 9
14k miles with no issues
Louisb is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
100 miles and into service - what do you think? Sea2Summit WK2 Grand Cherokee Forum 5 04-29-2012 01:25 PM
500 miles on a tank of gas with the V8 nathantw WK2 Grand Cherokee Forum 3 12-28-2011 08:29 PM
Any "Trouble Free" owners out there? magr80 WK2 Grand Cherokee Forum 30 06-05-2011 07:57 PM
Data Logged My 5.7. Stock Tune Looks Weak. Terminator2 WK2 Grand Cherokee Forum 10 06-03-2011 08:12 AM
CEL at 817 miles therritz WK2 Grand Cherokee Forum 3 01-25-2011 04:19 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome