The Photography Questions Thread - Page 4 - JeepForum.com

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #46 of 595 Old 03-01-2008, 11:13 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
hahahah awesome! glad to hear you were finally able to get it.

im also jealous


Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #47 of 595 Old 03-01-2008, 11:29 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
i was wondering if someone could go to my flickr site and look in the Random set and tell me what kinds of sets i could create with the pictures in there. im not really sure what to catagorize them as

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #48 of 595 Old 03-01-2008, 11:42 PM
jeepsarecool
Registered User
 
jeepsarecool's Avatar
1982 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,138
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Crom View Post
i was wondering if someone could go to my flickr site and look in the Random set and tell me what kinds of sets i could create with the pictures in there. im not really sure what to catagorize them as

I'd call them "art" or "artistic" or "artsy" or something along those lines.

Check out my Art


CJ7 - God's gift to the masochist.
jeepsarecool is offline  
post #49 of 595 Old 03-01-2008, 11:47 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
thanks! ill go ahead and change that around

Edit: its nice to finally have a pro account on there. it feels so much more organized

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #50 of 595 Old 03-02-2008, 07:03 AM
Wamp
Registered User
 
Wamp's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hogeye, Arkansas
Posts: 366
The vignetting is a problem with that Nikon lens. Here is a pretty comprehensive review that mentions the problem.
http://www.bythom.com/55200lens.htm
For $250 you get what you pay for. Just like anything else, to get pro results, you have to drop some serious coin on pro gear. My cheapest lens cost nearly $1K.
Or buy some used manual focus gear from the 1980's, learn how to focus and set an aperture and enjoy pro quality results at a discount.
Here is a shot I just took of my dog Scout. I used a Nikon D2hs digital camera with a 105 f/2.5 Nikkor lens circa. 1984. 1/500 shutter at f/5.6, 400 ISO. That particular lens is considered one of the sharpest, brightest lenses ever made.


This is shot on fine .jpg mode and worked with basic levels and scaled down a bit with iphoto.
There are a lot of good quality used Nikkor lenses on ebay and in camera stores and pawn shops everywhere.
Wamp is offline  
post #51 of 595 Old 03-02-2008, 08:05 AM
Wamp
Registered User
 
Wamp's Avatar
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Hogeye, Arkansas
Posts: 366
Here is what to look for in used Nikkor glass. They need to be AI or converted to AI. That means aperture indexed. If it's not AI, it will not fit correctly. The faster the lens, the more versatile it is, so look for lower f-stops-(1.8/2.0/2.8). I would start with a 50mm f/1.8 lens. Then add a 105 f/2.5 and a 180 f/2.8 for telephoto. When you want wider look for a 35 f/2.0 or a 24 f/2.8. Fixed focal length lenses are much sharper than zooms. Changing position for the right framing makes you look at your subject differently and can lead to better composition. In my opinion, zoom lenses make lazy photographers if you let them. Nothing can substitute getting your feet in different positions. What I call the foot zoom.
Wamp is offline  
post #52 of 595 Old 03-02-2008, 11:41 AM
actionplant
Registered User
1992 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ND
Posts: 19
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtwampler View Post
Or buy some used manual focus gear from the 1980's, learn how to focus and set an aperture and enjoy pro quality results at a discount.
Listen to this man, he gives good advice.
actionplant is offline  
post #53 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 02:24 AM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
ill have to poke around at the pawn shop tomorrow

i also thought of a cool series to do and i have nothing to write with so im posting here to remind myself. i wont post exactly what it is though

LT (if you can guess it ill tell you what it is)

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #54 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 12:09 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
Quote:
Originally Posted by thedirt View Post
The money goes into the lenses, not the body. A body is disposable, so to speak, but the lenses last decades (if not longer). Once you have a nice lens collection, then go for the nicer bodies. Not to mention that the higher end bodies will show all the faults in the cheaper lenses.

I read this quote somewhere and it really holds true: If you put a $100 lens on an $8000 body, it will perform as well as a $100 camera, but if you put an $8000 lens on a $500 body, it'll blow you away.

A lot of things go into producing a good image, but if your glass is bad, you might as well kiss the photo goodbye.
true but 3k for a camera setup to take pictures of your kids? thats way over kill. she could spend half as much and still get wonderful results.

you are somewhat on the right track with the my new project.

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #55 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 02:02 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
thanks for recomendation. ill let her know tomorrow when i see her.


id say you were closer with your first guess. whats Lomographic Tendencies???

this project may actually have a name already for all i know. but when i tried finding things on it i couldnt

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #56 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 04:49 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
oooooooooooooooooh ok ive seen alot of that. very cool stuff. never knew how it was done. i was going to go shoot the prairy dogs today but its still cold tomorrow its suppose to be ~60 out

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #57 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 07:12 PM
UPSucks
GO BIG RED!
 
UPSucks's Avatar
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 263
So I was wheelin' this weekend and a question came to mind. I let one of my buddies take some shots of my Jeep with my camera. I know it isn't a problem this time, but who do the photographs technically belong to since he took the pictures?

I also have the same lens that you have, and it does the same thing with the lighting! You can see it really good in this picture. I thought I was doing something wrong. Which I am still not ruling out.

UPSucks is offline  
post #58 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 07:14 PM Thread Starter
AlTheKillerr
Web Wheeler
 
AlTheKillerr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 5,056
id say that the pictures he took belong to him from a legal point of view but im no laywer so what do i know

Photographer
2000 XJ, 3.5" lift, 32s, Locked
AlTheKillerr is offline  
post #59 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 07:15 PM
Jeffro06
Registered User
 
Jeffro06's Avatar
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Total
Posts: 9,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by UPSucks View Post
So I was wheelin' this weekend and a question came to mind. I let one of my buddies take some shots of my Jeep with my camera. I know it isn't a problem this time, but who do the photographs technically belong to since he took the pictures?
He does, why do you ask? Are you selling them? If not, it doesn't really matter.
Jeffro06 is offline  
post #60 of 595 Old 03-03-2008, 07:18 PM
UPSucks
GO BIG RED!
 
UPSucks's Avatar
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 263
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeffro95 View Post
He does, why do you ask? Are you selling them? If not, it doesn't really matter.
Nope,,,that is why I said it isn't a problem this time.

I really doubt I'll ever have pictures that are that good, but if I lent my camera to the right person!!
UPSucks is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Photography and the law AlTheKillerr Film, Music and Art 45 07-28-2009 08:48 PM
Photography 95ZJL Film, Music and Art 31 05-07-2007 12:46 PM
Night Photography Muddy Cherokee Film, Music and Art 23 03-07-2007 06:08 PM
The Jeep Photography Thread HeavyMetal Film, Music and Art 26 10-23-2006 02:22 PM
Photography Rasta_Coty Film, Music and Art 11 08-18-2006 01:38 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome