post #16 of Old 05-15-2011, 01:43 AM
Poncherello
Moderator
2010 KK Liberty 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Paterson
Posts: 1,125
Plastic intakes(upper plenums) have been used by many starting as early as '96(GM).Plus it's cheaper,by alot,and easier to make then a alloy plenum.

I agree here that plastic is much cheaper to produce then alloy, and I read too that inner channels are much smoother hence giving you better flow. But to me it's just cheap, but if you shoudl need to replace it, they will still charge you and arm and leg for it lol.

On another note, again just kind of dreaming, I think having an addtional option of the 3.0 CRD and a 4.7 Liter V8 with cylinder deactivation would be great optional engines for the Liberty matched with a 5-6 speed auto or man trans and some factory lockers.

Moreover, I am happy with what I got, and only have 38 more payments left to go :]

Poncherello is offline  
post #17 of Old 05-15-2011, 02:27 AM
mike_breaker_5
Registered User
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: emporium,
Posts: 3,005
just poking my nose in here, i have been reading on the new pentastar recently and looking at the numbers it has more factory torque and hp than the 5.2 i just finished swapping into my yj.

Ratmonkey donation page. all proceeds will go to his family.
http://www.youcaring.com/memorial-fu..._source=widget


it's not much to look at... but it's mine.
5.2lswap, metalcloaks, bedliner, tucked belly, d60's, soon to be nv4500 and d300.
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f22/m...r-junk-990191/
mike_breaker_5 is offline  
post #18 of Old 05-15-2011, 05:49 AM
tjkj2002
Registered User
2002 KJ Liberty 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 8,360
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poncherello View Post
but if you shoudl need to replace it, they will still charge you and arm and leg for it lol.
The upper plastic plenum for the 3.7 is like $85.

'02 Liberty sitting on 35" tires,HP44,RockJock60,and AtlasII t-case
tjkj2002 is offline  
post #19 of Old 05-15-2011, 06:26 AM
mike_breaker_5
Registered User
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: emporium,
Posts: 3,005
i kind of like the newer composite intakes. they have a reusable gasket on them, light, way cheaper than aluminum, and are still pretty durable. when's the last time you had an impact to the intake manifold that you were thinking "man, i better go check and see if that cracked my intake manifold"? i have however seen some poorly designed ones (cough cough ford), but they seem win win to me. you lose weight turbulence over castings through lighter materials and smoother plenum walls.

Ratmonkey donation page. all proceeds will go to his family.
http://www.youcaring.com/memorial-fu..._source=widget


it's not much to look at... but it's mine.
5.2lswap, metalcloaks, bedliner, tucked belly, d60's, soon to be nv4500 and d300.
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f22/m...r-junk-990191/
mike_breaker_5 is offline  
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome