Quantcast on to the next jeep so.... - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles

Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Grand Cherokee & Commander Forums > Grand Cherokee General Discussion > on to the next jeep so....

Rough Country Deals at JeepHut.comIntroducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineFREE shipping on Rugged Ridge Soft tops @thejeephut.com

View Poll Results: so what should i replace the 93 zj with?!?!?!
newer zj 21 39.62%
wj 20 37.74%
wrangler 2000ish 12 22.64%
non jeep product 0 0%
Voters: 53. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
Old 09-01-2009, 12:13 AM   #1
leofanti
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 72
on to the next jeep so....

alright, im looking for input. i currently have a 93 zj thats just about on its last leg so im looking to replace it. i really do like the zj, but i like the bodystyle of the wj. and at the same time the best off road adventure i had was in a 2000 wrangler. so what im asking, what should i replace the zj with? another zj, a wj, wrangler, or now dont hate me for saying this, but a non jeep product. obviously im not looking to buy new, just newer than what i got. i personally dont go to moab (though id like to), and dont do any rock crawling or nothing of the sorts. i just like the trails that lead to nowhere in general. driving in the snow and sometimes in the mud. dont get me wrong im for all of it, but just from what i actually do is not extreme by any means. so give me your input please, just dont be to hard on me here. thanks ahead of time.

leofanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:16 AM   #2
leofanti
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 72
quick question also, i have 190k on the zj now with the 4.0l. should i stay with that engine? what kind of mileage can you squeeze out of the v8's? input please. thanks
leofanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:22 AM   #3
SnowLeopard
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,780
I rather like the new Wrangler Unlimited, but perhaps that's too new for your liking. It's very hardy though, and the styling is better than previous years. They have some really nice off-road options, also. The longer wheelbase adds to on-road handling. I like that a lot over the squirrelly nature of the older 2 door style Wranglers.

The ZJ is more rugged feeling, a bit older in styling and refinement in comparison to the WJ, but I think people have less overall issues with them. Then again, it's all subjective. Some people have no trouble with the ZJ's, others have endless problems. The same goes for WJ's. I myself like the styling of the WJ better but feel the ZJ is a bit more off-road worthy to start with. Stock it's got more ground clearance and I believe better approach/departure angles. A few mods and that can easily be overcome though. The WJ's have the 4.7 and Quadradrive, and for your applications that might be just the ticket. I've loved that combo myself and wished I could've afforded it back when I got my ZJ.

It's a really big can-o-worms you open with this question. There will be pros and cons to each model. It really all comes down to how much you can afford and taste. It's a Jeep. It can wheel. Beyond that, it's up to you.
__________________
Yes, it snows in Texas.

"Roads? Where we're going we don't need roads"
SnowLeopard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:44 AM   #4
sadass
5.9,242,4.56,Aussies x 2
 
sadass's Avatar
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hopeless Juction, NY
Posts: 2,181
I had the 93 4.sl0w. Now go for a 98 5.9
__________________
Military Jeepers.Com.
Jeep Forum member since 2/2002
5Nine=No replacement for Displacement
sadass is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:48 AM   #5
leofanti
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 72
what kind of mileage you have on your 5.9 sadass? and the 98 v8 zj's are 5.9's? what other goodies would a 98 have opposed to my 93? other than the motor, tranny,tcase.

Last edited by leofanti; 09-01-2009 at 12:50 AM.. Reason: i forgot to mention it
leofanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 01:18 AM   #6
sean924
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: El Dorado Hills,Ca
Posts: 246
just my personal preferrance would be a wj, i love my 98 zj limited with a 5.2 but the mileage sucks at 11 mpg average with combined city and freeway. The 4.7L motors in th wjs get decent mileage i have heard from a few friends, that and what it sounds like you mostly use it for, light wheeling and a DD, IMO it doesnt get much better than the luxury comforts and the styling of a wj.
__________________
98 ZJ, IRO 5.5" critical path. 33x12.50x15 KM2's, 15x8 soft 8's, alpine system, radio shack CB, PA speaker.
Firefighters Jeep Club
sean924 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 01:26 AM   #7
leofanti
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: phoenix, az
Posts: 72
when i say mileage i mean mileage, not gas mileage. sorry if this confused anyone. thanks for the opinion sean, i do like the wj's a lot. im just trying to research moderate (3"-4") lifts, what axle options where there in the 2000ish year, dependability of the 4.7l and so on. only thing with another zj is the one i have now i could use for parts and what not. now for the people that give their input after this, maybe a lil pro/con on the zj, wj, wrangler. and sean again, yo hit the nail on the head, since it is my daily driver, and im not a hard core wheeler (yet) the wj would probably be the way to go. thanks again everyone, keep the info rolling.
leofanti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 03:02 AM   #8
sadass
5.9,242,4.56,Aussies x 2
 
sadass's Avatar
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hopeless Juction, NY
Posts: 2,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by leofanti View Post
what kind of mileage you have on your 5.9 sadass? and the 98 v8 zj's are 5.9's? what other goodies would a 98 have opposed to my 93? other than the motor, tranny,tcase.
98 was the only year for the 5.9, but they also had the 5.2 in 98.
much nicer seats/Interior, Heated supple calf leather seats with lumbar. 10 speaker system . with sound bar, moon roof, Nice 5.9 rims, bigger Alternator, bigger drive train with a lager rear drive shaft. 373 gears. different roof rack and cladding. hood louvers and diff grill. I bought mine with around 80k now have 120k, as far as gas millage, mine is not good because I have a lift bigger tires and 4.56 gears, and a heavy foot.


__________________
Military Jeepers.Com.
Jeep Forum member since 2/2002
5Nine=No replacement for Displacement
sadass is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 12:33 PM   #9
bigbluezj94
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV (nellis afb)
Posts: 2,068
how about a 99 jeep grand cherokee WJ. 4.7?


PM me if interested
__________________
94 Grand Cherokee Laredo ZJ, lifted, 37s, yada yada yada
BigBlue build 33s, 6in lift and short arms
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f197/bigbluezj94-build-thread-679496/

BigBlue build 3/4 ton axles, LAs, 37s
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f197/3-4-ton-zj-build-818891/

99 Grand Cherokee Laredo WJ, 4.7 liter, 247 Quadra Trac II, fully loaded


bigbluezj94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 01:44 PM   #10
sqweehoppa
Registered User
1992 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: duluth mn
Posts: 75
dude does your 4.0 I6 still run? cuz if you get something else i want the motor
sqweehoppa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 01:57 PM   #11
MoonyJohn
Nighthawk
 
MoonyJohn's Avatar
2000 WJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West Linn, Oregon
Posts: 5,217
I think that if your looking for an upgrade, get a wj. IMO they have nicer exterior looks and they ride like a cadillac.
__________________
Built Not Bought #037

Project Blue Moon Build Thread > > > http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f197/moonyjohns-project-blue-moon-2000-wj-1009379/

1996 ZJ 4.0 - [SOLD]
2000 WJ 4.7 - 5.5" Front IRO LA, 2" Front spacers, Bilstein 5125 12" travel, JKS BPE's, 35/12.5 Goodyear MT/R Kevlar, 15x8 3.75" MD 72 Series, SOLID D30 cover, BTF D44a cover, Cobra CB, 4' Firestik, Alpine iDA-X305, Alpine SWE-1243 Sub, Homemade sliders, Laredo Style Headlights, 20% window tint, D-ring shackle, Custom front bumper, Procomp 9" Lights, Gas tank lift, XRC-8 Winch w/ Synthetic, K&N FIPK Intake Kit, Magnaflow High-Flow Cat, FM50 series, Amsoil 6x9 Filter, LED tailights, Alpine Door Speakers & Tweeters, Custom Rear Swing Out Bumper w/ Spare
MoonyJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 02:28 PM   #12
gmp211
Registered User
2002 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 743
It honestly depends. If you wheel a ton and like aftermarket support, get the Wrangler. But if you have a family, or mainly a daily driver, get the WJ. If you want to save some cash between the car, lift, and gas, get the ZJ.
__________________
Buy my Hi Lift X-treme!!!!
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f130/hi-lift-jack-x-treme-48-a-925983/
gmp211 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 02:41 PM   #13
bigbluezj94
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV (nellis afb)
Posts: 2,068
i vote WJ, mine in particular. but on a serious not, they are just way more refined over your 93. When i bought my WJ originally i was like "ooooo what does this button dooo!?" lol there is is plenty of aftermarket support for them as well. and there is only more coming from new and different companies. If i didnt need a truck to tow my ZJ, i wouldnt be selling it and it would have a good lift and a set of tires on it. I love my WJ but i need a truck.
__________________
94 Grand Cherokee Laredo ZJ, lifted, 37s, yada yada yada
BigBlue build 33s, 6in lift and short arms
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=679496

BigBlue build 3/4 ton axles, LAs, 37s
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=818891

99 Grand Cherokee Laredo WJ, 4.7 liter, 247 Quadra Trac II, fully loaded


bigbluezj94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 02:51 PM   #14
Jones
Infowars.com
 
Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 7,610
I agree with sadass, go with a 5.9. I sold my 93 ZJ for a 98 5.9 and I'm so happy I did.
__________________
What is it about Ron Paul?
Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2009, 05:56 PM   #15
rallyjeep_11
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: missouri
Posts: 131
go wj or zj, last thing we need is another slutty wrangler running around with its top off.
__________________
If you were wondering, everything i say is stupid.

98 zj red. /2"bb /5.2l/rough country hydro 8000's/ rough country SS/ hella 500's /flowmaster muffler/ 3.5" tip, highflo cat, gear alloys and 255/70r16 sport kings
rallyjeep_11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads




Glock Forum



Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.

Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved