lightest v8 for swap, sbf or sbc? -
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back > General Technical Discussions > Engines & Drivetrain > lightest v8 for swap, sbf or sbc?

Clayton Off Road WJ Long Arm Kits!Baseline 4x4 Lifetime Warranty 4340 Chromoly Axle Shaft KiClayton Off Road - JK Prototype Gas Tank Skid

Unread 10-07-2012, 08:24 PM   #1
Registered User
1971 CJ5 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 88
lightest v8 for swap, sbf or sbc?

which would be the lightest setup for a v8 swap? if its available as a junk yard swap, that would be much better than a tricked out aluminum build off the shelf. im liking the fords a bit better for the forward mounted distributor but the sbc seems much more popular.

broylz is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 10-08-2012, 07:50 PM   #2
Registered User
1984 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,462
Kill a few birds with the same stone. GM ls engines are becoming available and no more distribution its all coil on plug, and aluminum. Even a 5.3 puts down a healthy kick. A manual trans will be lighter than an automatic. shop around and do some searching.

I haven't actually had both on a scale to call it concrete, but have heard that a SBC and auto(th350/700r4) is about the same weight as a 4.0l auto. I'd guess the 350 would tip a touch more but the increase in power would make up for the difference.
84 xj 350tbi, sm465, 203/205, 60/70. links and other junk.
what size sawzall blades does it take to fit 40's?
ltrail is offline   Reply With Quote

Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.