Any Problem with Switching to a 180º Thermostat in a Dodge 5.9L V8? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General Technical Discussions > Engines & Drivetrain > Any Problem with Switching to a 180º Thermostat in a Dodge 5.9L V8?

ROCKRIDGE4WD Introduces a NEW Jeep Wrangler JK *led* tail Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineEngo winches available at www.rockridge4wd.com! Free shipp

Reply
Unread 05-02-2012, 12:53 PM   #1
DECJ
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: La Sal, Utah
Posts: 121
Any Problem with Switching to a 180º Thermostat in a Dodge 5.9L V8?

I've got a swapped-in Dodge Magnum 5.9L V8 engine in my 2000 Jeep TJ and I am about to do the plenum plate upgrade to my factory intake manifold.

While I am doing this work, I plan to replace the thermostat. I could of course just go with the same 195º thermostat that the factory used for this engine, but I have previously heard that a lot of guys have gone with a 180º unit.

I would also like to go with a 180º thermostat, however, I want to make sure that I am not going to get into any unintended consequences from a performance perspective by doing this. For example, if the PCM is looking for the engine to come up to operating temperature, I don't want to get into any potential fuel mixture or advance curve issues with the PCM wrongly interpreting the lower engine operating temp as an indication that the engine hasn't fully warmed up yet.

So, if anyone with either a Dodge Magnum 5.2L or 5.9L has switched to a 180º thermostat, or is otherwise knowledgeable about the way the PCM looks at the engine operating temp (as a function of coolant temp), please let me know if you have had any adverse performance problems or whether this move wouldn't be recommended for some reason.

Thanks in advance,
Don

__________________
2000 TJ, Dodge Magnum 5.9L V8/46RE auto, NV-241OR Rock-Trac tcase, Full-Traction LA, SwayLOK, 35" MT/R Kevlars on forged Center Line wheels, ARB's/Superior Super axles, etc.
DECJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-02-2012, 01:54 PM   #2
LJameson
Registered User
1990 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Elizabeth Lake, CA
Posts: 3,717
The problem with going to a cooler thermostat is like you said, the PCM will possibly stay in open loop and not operate as efficiently, dumping more fuel into the engine then it should.

Chrysler designed the engine as a whole unit to run as efficiently as possible with a 195* thermostat. And really, all the thermostat will help with is the minimum operating temperature that the engine will run at. During hot days, it will run at whatever temp your cooling system is capable of keeping it at. IMHO, I'd just stick to the 195* thermostat.
__________________
"Anything to do with the land, I love."
"So it's probably eighty percent luck and twenty percent skill."

-Chris LeDoux

I never could figure what the sky was thinking, but the soil, she don't keep too many secrets.
LJameson is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2012, 07:52 AM   #3
DECJ
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: La Sal, Utah
Posts: 121
Yep, you're absolutely right.

Also, here's a comprehensive write-up on the subject on Dodge Forum ... http://dodgeforum.com/forum/2nd-gen-...-and-cons.html

I also received a response from a Dodge service tech on another board I posted to who basically gave a shorter version of the same information that was in the Dodge Forum write-up.

So, since I don't have a tuner/programmer, I am definitely going to stay with a 195º thermostat as I don't need to get even worse fuel mileage.
__________________
2000 TJ, Dodge Magnum 5.9L V8/46RE auto, NV-241OR Rock-Trac tcase, Full-Traction LA, SwayLOK, 35" MT/R Kevlars on forged Center Line wheels, ARB's/Superior Super axles, etc.
DECJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2012, 08:11 AM   #4
comptiger5000
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stamford, CT / Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,139
The PCM will still go into closed loop at 180*. It won't hurt anything to run a the 180* stat, other than maybe a small drop in fuel mileage. However, there's no good reason to do it, as the benefits are minimal. Heck, I'm one of the few running a 5.9 with power mods that still has a 195* t-stat in it.
comptiger5000 is online now   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2012, 08:32 AM   #5
DECJ
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: La Sal, Utah
Posts: 121
Quote:
Originally Posted by comptiger5000 View Post
The PCM will still go into closed loop at 180*.
That's good to know as I wasn't sure what the closed loop temperature threshold was.

Quote:
It won't hurt anything to run a the 180* stat, other than maybe a small drop in fuel mileage. However, there's no good reason to do it, as the benefits are minimal. Heck, I'm one of the few running a 5.9 with power mods that still has a 195* t-stat in it.
I get bad enough fuel mileage as it is, so I don't want to add to that . By the way, here's a shot of my 5.9 going into my TJ. It also has a number of power mods as well ...

__________________
2000 TJ, Dodge Magnum 5.9L V8/46RE auto, NV-241OR Rock-Trac tcase, Full-Traction LA, SwayLOK, 35" MT/R Kevlars on forged Center Line wheels, ARB's/Superior Super axles, etc.
DECJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-03-2012, 08:36 AM   #6
comptiger5000
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Stamford, CT / Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,139
Very nice!
comptiger5000 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.