302 horsepower? - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > General Technical Discussions > Engines & Drivetrain > 302 horsepower?

Introducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed LineBrand New! Quadratec LED Headlights!New Vendor - ARTEC Industries Battery Mounts

Reply
Unread 01-11-2003, 11:55 PM   #1
Bret-o
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 318
302 horsepower?

Can anyone tell me how much horsepower a 302 V8 puts out?

__________________
'95 YJ- 2.5L
Flat Fendered, 3 1/2" Rusty's suspension lift, 1" BL, 1" shackles, 33x12.50 Swamper TSL's, Clarion CD Player, JL Amp, 2 10" Kicker Comps, Bestop, Tuffy Console, some engine mods......Member of Independent Offroad in Bowling Green, KY

--Had to get something new for the college commute, BUT, the Jeep is still mine and my Dad's--

[COLOR=green]Green Jeep Club Member #41[/COLOR]
AIM- Rdaehtoh
Bret-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2003, 09:03 AM   #2
Devious
Hobo
 
Devious's Avatar
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 2,705
Depends on the year,FI, carb,etc. Can you be more specific?
__________________
Life is tough enough already, but it's even tougher when you're stupid
Devious is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-12-2003, 08:13 PM   #3
Bret-o
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 318
It's an 89 Ford Bronco engine, Fuel Injected.
__________________
'95 YJ- 2.5L
Flat Fendered, 3 1/2" Rusty's suspension lift, 1" BL, 1" shackles, 33x12.50 Swamper TSL's, Clarion CD Player, JL Amp, 2 10" Kicker Comps, Bestop, Tuffy Console, some engine mods......Member of Independent Offroad in Bowling Green, KY

--Had to get something new for the college commute, BUT, the Jeep is still mine and my Dad's--

[COLOR=green]Green Jeep Club Member #41[/COLOR]
AIM- Rdaehtoh
Bret-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2003, 08:42 PM   #4
OldJeepguy
Registered User
1979 CJ7 
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Santee, CA.
Posts: 753
I just found this - lot's of good info....

Ford Engines
__________________
Steve
jeep79cj@yahoo.com

Last edited by OldJeepguy; 01-13-2003 at 08:47 PM..
OldJeepguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2003, 09:17 PM   #5
Bret-o
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 318
Thanks OldJeepGuy, but I had another thread asking about then 4.0 6cyl. horsepower put out 190HP this site says that a 302 only puts out 185hp. I dunno, but thanks for the link.
__________________
'95 YJ- 2.5L
Flat Fendered, 3 1/2" Rusty's suspension lift, 1" BL, 1" shackles, 33x12.50 Swamper TSL's, Clarion CD Player, JL Amp, 2 10" Kicker Comps, Bestop, Tuffy Console, some engine mods......Member of Independent Offroad in Bowling Green, KY

--Had to get something new for the college commute, BUT, the Jeep is still mine and my Dad's--

[COLOR=green]Green Jeep Club Member #41[/COLOR]
AIM- Rdaehtoh
Bret-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-13-2003, 09:31 PM   #6
CSP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 12,305
Quote:
Originally posted by Bret-o
Thanks OldJeepGuy, but I had another thread asking about then 4.0 6cyl. horsepower put out 190HP this site says that a 302 only puts out 185hp. I dunno, but thanks for the link.
It all depends on what years you are comparing. Newer engines do make more horsepower because of technology. Truck engines like the Bronco 5.0 you're asking about aren't designed with high horsepower in mind. The idea behind them is reliable life and torque. Raw horsepower numbers usually don't mean squat by themselves. It all depends on the application and the intended use of the engine that matters. The numbers sound about right to me. An early 90's Ford 5.0 in a Mustang was around the 235-250 hp mark. Look at what they're turning out now with a smaller engine!
CSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-14-2003, 08:52 PM   #7
Bret-o
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 318
Thanks CSP.
__________________
'95 YJ- 2.5L
Flat Fendered, 3 1/2" Rusty's suspension lift, 1" BL, 1" shackles, 33x12.50 Swamper TSL's, Clarion CD Player, JL Amp, 2 10" Kicker Comps, Bestop, Tuffy Console, some engine mods......Member of Independent Offroad in Bowling Green, KY

--Had to get something new for the college commute, BUT, the Jeep is still mine and my Dad's--

[COLOR=green]Green Jeep Club Member #41[/COLOR]
AIM- Rdaehtoh
Bret-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2003, 05:41 PM   #8
Intrepidjeep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cape Canaveral, Florida
Posts: 355
And what was the horsepower of that 5.9L, 360-cubic-inch monster V8 in the Grand Wagoneer the last year it was produced, which was 1991?

140

One hundred and forty.

The torque wasn't even impressive -- I believe it was 275 or so. Pathetic. I know it could have produced so much more, but they had a stranglehold on it with that little carburetor.
__________________
-- Marcus
Cape Canaveral, Florida
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L
2005 Dodge Durango SLT 4.7L
Intrepidjeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2003, 07:18 PM   #9
Bret-o
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bowling Green, KY
Posts: 318
My dad has a 360 AMC in his CJ7, when he had 2.73 gears he was putting out 220hp. Now that he has upgraded to 4.56s he is putting out about 275-280. Its from an old wagoneer though.
__________________
'95 YJ- 2.5L
Flat Fendered, 3 1/2" Rusty's suspension lift, 1" BL, 1" shackles, 33x12.50 Swamper TSL's, Clarion CD Player, JL Amp, 2 10" Kicker Comps, Bestop, Tuffy Console, some engine mods......Member of Independent Offroad in Bowling Green, KY

--Had to get something new for the college commute, BUT, the Jeep is still mine and my Dad's--

[COLOR=green]Green Jeep Club Member #41[/COLOR]
AIM- Rdaehtoh
Bret-o is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-15-2003, 08:50 PM   #10
Intrepidjeep
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Cape Canaveral, Florida
Posts: 355
That's great! See, I knew it could put out the power with the right hardware, but in stock form on the Wagoneer it was really weak. Of course, all engines were weaker 12+ years ago, but 140hp out of a 360cu.in. V8??
__________________
-- Marcus
Cape Canaveral, Florida
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Laredo 4.7L
2005 Dodge Durango SLT 4.7L
Intrepidjeep is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-16-2003, 11:00 PM   #11
mad_scientist
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 116
the 302 is actually made for high rpms. It has a short stroke and a large bore.

most hopped up 302s with a stock bottom end (rods, crank, bearings, etc) can run to 7000rpm without too much problem

Essentially, minus the 289 (302= stroked 289), not really many -if any- other engine is designed for high rpm (physics wise).

Ford puts a itsy bitsy cam in there to make torque , but it hits a huge wall at 3400 rpms. Put a mild cam, headers, intake and new carb on it and it will run to 5500 strong and produce about 250-265 horsepower easy. (nice torque too...)

there are a ton of parts for this motor too... and they are pretty simple to work on.

FOr not much money you can make an awesome 302... which is much lighter than the new breed of ford overhead cam engines.

check out edelbrock for a few dyno runs of the engine
mad_scientist is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-17-2003, 10:29 PM   #12
jeepdaddy2000
Web Wheeler
 
jeepdaddy2000's Avatar
1971 CJ5 
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Eagle Point Oregon
Posts: 6,199
Again, remember that the more HP you make, the higher in the RPM band you will be. With a cooresponding loss of low end torque. Be sure to decide what you want your engine(Jeep) to do, then build it to that application. When it comes to torque, THERE IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR CUBIC DISPLACEMENT!
jeepdaddy2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 01-21-2003, 09:51 AM   #13
4wheeler4CJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southern Rhode Island
Posts: 1,527
Quote:
Originally posted by jeepdaddy2000
Again, remember that the more HP you make, the higher in the RPM band you will be. With a cooresponding loss of low end torque. Be sure to decide what you want your engine(Jeep) to do, then build it to that application. When it comes to torque, THERE IS NO REPLACEMENT FOR CUBIC DISPLACEMENT!
I'll second that.....exactly why trucks made for pulling and "work" came thru with large displacement engines....360s & 401s in Jeep Trucks, 460s in Fords, 454s in GMs, etc etc.

Not that smaller V-8s are not sufficient for pulling or working, but the larger ones work much less at developing the torque, and will last longer under stress. (Or just go diesel, LOL)
4wheeler4CJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-21-2003, 12:58 PM   #14
Jrod-13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Houghton MI, Tower MN
Posts: 6
The big thing with the 5.0 efi motors, is the design of the EFI intakes. They use a very long runner, to make alot of torque for the size motor they are. For instance, the 5.0 H.O. in my mustange makes 225hp@4000rpm. and 300ftlbs@3200pm. The main reason for this is the long unners.
I would say forget the bronco motor and go for the H.O. I paid $200 for a running lincoln mark VII had a 5.0 H.O. with 165K on it, not even broken in.

Also the H.O. motors have a roller cam, and forged pistons. You can find them in 87-93 mustangs, 86+ Lincoln Mark VII's and in some thunderbirds..
__________________
89 SSV mustang, 4.10's, mac equal length, O/R H-pipe, pullies, short belt.

89 F-150 359W, 600 holley, headman, ported heads, T-18, Ford 9", spool, 5" lift, 35" bfg KM MT

84 broncoII 302, 600 holley, 484"cam, jacobs, ladder bars, fender exits.
Jrod-13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-22-2003, 12:05 PM   #15
balloo93
Little Red Menace
 
balloo93's Avatar
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 20,821
Just a FYI the MUstangs used Hyperutectic pistons on the 93 models. I think the Cobra and CobraR were the only exceptions in that year.

I am also a believer in the 5.0 as a viable swap. Pretty much self contained (slightly smaller motor), they're everywhere, roller motor, and performance bolt ons up the wazoo!
__________________
93 Sport
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy............Ben Franklin


Specs in Profile.

http://www.cardomain.com/ride/325707/1
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2406854/1
balloo93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.