XJ Owners Report In! - Page 3 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Cherokee & Comanche Forums > XJ Cherokee Non-Technical Forum > XJ Owners Report In!

End of Summer Sale, 20% OFF!2007 - 2011 Jeep JK Long Arm Lift KitsIntroducing MONSTALINER™ UV Permanent DIY Roll On Bed Line

Reply
Unread 09-03-2008, 08:43 PM   #31
ReconMill
Flat-4 Turbo
 
ReconMill's Avatar
2005  
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dover, OH
Posts: 3,863
Kyle Nelson

Dover, Ohio

I realize we have long since passed the point of blog parody, with the number of words written about Revkin's article now exceeding the number of words in the article itself by many orders of magnitude. But I gots more to say -- a big ol' rant I've wanted to get out for a long while.
It seems in retrospect that much of the umbrage the article caused was due to the fact that people misunderstood its main thrust, mainly because it was sloppily written. It fairly begged for misinterpretation.
What Revkin was trying to do is aptly summarized in his comment on RealClimate:
The orthodoxy described on TV, in movie theaters, enviro campaigns etc is that AGW is a realtime crisis that is momentous and huge and terrifying, but can be solved with existing technologies. ... AGW is still mainly portrayed (outside of your rarefied circles) as a problem to be fixed (a raging fire to put out), not a risk to be cut.
Revkin thinks the public only hears from two groups: denialists and people who frame climate change as a huge, immediate crisis that can be solved, rather than an ongoing, long-term risk we need to adjust to. Fair enough. I have my quibbles with that, but put them aside.
The key to the way the article was actually interpreted lies in the first paragraph: "Amid the shouting lately about whether global warming is a human-caused catastrophe or a hoax, some usually staid climate scientists in the usually invisible middle are speaking up."
Amid the shouting, a middle.


I want to say just a little about why people, particularly progressives, familiar with recent political debate in this country react to this framing with (perhaps hair-trigger) outrage. It's a huge topic about which much has been written. I'll just wave my hands in the general direction.
A little pop history. The '60s counter-culture revolution was deeply, deeply galvanizing for many people. Not so much for the hippies themselves, mind you -- the Boomers transitioned fairly seamlessly into toothless feel-good bromides, middle management, and unrepentant consumerism. No, the real legacy of the 60s/early 70s was to freak out conservatives on a primal, lizard-brain level (see: Nixon, Richard M. and descendants). A "culture war" was born, broke the surface with the Reagan Revolution, and continues unabated. The ideological messages were simple: socialism is evil, any use of government on behalf of public welfare amounts to socialism, markets rule, aggressive militarism rules, sex is evil, God rules, and above all -- the central governing principle, the North Star, the lodestone -- beware the dirty hippies.
Beware the dirty hippies. They're immature and irresponsible. They're utopians and dreamers. They meddle with lives and hate Christian values and blame America first and root for terrorists. They want free sex and legalized drugs and mandatory abortion. They want to eat your babies. They heart Satan.
This enormous backlash against revolutionary leftism continued growing and gaining strength long after revolutionary leftism petered out as a political force of any real influence. The narratives and habits of mind bequeathed us by the culture war are with us still, despite the long-ago disappearance of one combatant. It's shadowboxing on a nationwide scale, and it shows no signs of abating.
Any number of examples could be cited. The same dynamic plays out on virtually every issue: there's the virulent far-right position, funded by deep-pocketed reactionaries and pushed by talk radio, an enormous network of mutually reinforcing conservative pundits in every major media outlet, an entire cable news network (three now, really), and numerous powerful politicians in leadership positions in every branch of government. Then there's the avowedly liberal position, represented by some obscure professor or a guy in the comment section of a blog or a random placard at a protest. Then there's the "centrist" position, which is the far-right position with the edges rubbed off.
How does one establish oneself as a "centrist"? Why, by bashing the dirty hippies. After all, if you bash the virulent reactionaries, you're criticizing "real Americans" and the heartland and the baby Jesus. Everybody positions themselves by way of their distance from the -- at this point largely mythical -- dirty hippie. There's no faster route to media exposure for someone on the left that to spend every minute of the day criticizing other people on the left. Mickey Kaus. Joe Klein. Richard Cohen. Joe Lieberman. The list goes on and on.
Nowhere has this dynamic been more clear and more utterly at odds with reality than around the Iraq War. Before the war, there were people who supported war -- both the militarist right and the "liberal hawks" -- and people who opposed war without the U.N.'s imprimatur, i.e., the bulk of the country. The former were "serious" people; the latter were dirty hippies.
Well. We see how the war has gone. It's a cataclysmic disaster by every conceivable metric. The serious people were wrong about everything. Literally everything. The dirty hippies -- the great masses of the public and the very few public figures (Feingold, Gore, Kucinich) who stood with them -- were right. The war went horribly wrong for just the reasons they said it would.
So what's the dynamic now amidst the Beltway chattering classes? Where's the center? Why, it's still in the exact same place! The people who advocated for war, and who advocate for more war, and who were wrong about everything, are still the "serious" people. The people who advocated against this fiasco, and are advocating for ending it, and who were right about everything, are still the dirty hippies who never show up on cable news or in major media op-eds. Expeditious withdrawal is a fringe leftist position, despite being supported by a clear majority of the country.
In other words, the "center" has become utterly detached from facts, substance, or majority opinion. It's an insular, self-sustaining myth, all about the vanity and egos of powerful people in the Beltway cluster****. It's about them, their self-flattery, their exclusive club, not Iraq. For a truly parodic example of this dynamic and its incredible staying power, check out Joe Klein's blog post, wherein he informs us that OK, the dirty hippies were right about Iraq, but they still sound silly and their opponents are still more "serious." One can only marvel.
To get back to the topic at hand: The last thing the global warming debate needs is for this kind of dynamic to develop. Really. If for no other reason than my head would explode.
Though I know in the end it isn't, it's easy to mistake Revkin's article for a concerted attempt to establish such a dynamic.
You've got one "side" that's wrong about everything, willfully dishonest, openly in hock to corporate interests, and disdained by every real expert in the area, but nonetheless still taken seriously and quoted frequently in the mainstream media. And then there's the "other side," which has been right about everything but is, in the judgment of the self-appointed hall monitors of public dialogue, too shrill about the whole thing, and thus "extremist."
Then there's the "middle," established by wannabe media stars. It means: same substantive positions as the dirty hippies but not a dirty hippie! One establishes oneself as part of this middle, as always, by criticizing ... no, not the avowed, repeated liars ... but the dirty hippies. You become the media's favorite creature: the liberal who hates liberals, or the green who hates greens, or the person who's right about stuff who hates other people who are right about stuff but who care more than is acceptable in "serious" circles.
It's a big vanity play, a garish, self-involved, decadent distraction. Meanwhile, this debate over too much action vs. too little action vs. just the right action takes place in a context of no action at all. And the people who recognize this madness, who are putting themselves out there, struggling to get some kind of political momentum started, what's their reward? What do they get for their efforts?
They get branded dirty hippies, so we can have a new club of self-appointed centrists. Feh.

__________________
Kyle - I mod stuff®
2005 Subaru Legacy GT
SOLD!!! - 1999 XJ Build Thread
ReconMill is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:11 PM   #32
freeburg
Registered User
1987 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: freeburg,il
Posts: 321
josh smithton il
MJ owner
__________________
87 MJ 2.5 5spd 6.5" 34"TSL D30/8.8 4.88's
D44/9in(spool)5.13s redoing then putting back on the comanche maybe....
freeburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:16 PM   #33
19cherokee95
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 62
john
philadelphia,pa
19cherokee95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:17 PM   #34
1988XJ
Registered User
1988 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: bethlehem pa
Posts: 378
Mike
Bethlehem PA
my jeep is back on the road (knock on wood!!!)
__________________
-Mike
blown engine count: 2
my build:
http://jeepforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=611854
1988 jeep cherokee trimed fenders, 2 inch lift, 32X11.50 Bfg mt's
1988XJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:19 PM   #35
tigeowner
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: St.Louis, MO
Posts: 188
Im Mike

Smack damb in the heart of St.Louis, MO(hate it)

I'll come up with some better stuff later....
tigeowner is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:21 PM   #36
freeburg
Registered User
1987 MJ Comanche 
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: freeburg,il
Posts: 321
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigeowner View Post
Im Mike

Smack damb in the heart of St.Louis, MO(hate it)

I'll come up with some better stuff later....

you interested in wheeling sometime we got some awesome trails here contractor ran outta money and well he opened it to 4x4 and atvs
__________________
87 MJ 2.5 5spd 6.5" 34"TSL D30/8.8 4.88's
D44/9in(spool)5.13s redoing then putting back on the comanche maybe....
freeburg is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 09:49 PM   #37
aircruiser
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: minnesota
Posts: 9,695
Grant

just outside of burnsville minnesota

im down for wheeling as long as i dont work and am not working on the jeep. if im not with the jeep, im with friends so send me a pm if ya know of anymore spots around here.
__________________
1996 XJ on 36" TSLs, 4", locked F/R, stretched
aircruiser is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:05 PM   #38
d-man5000
Registered User
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 96
Daniel B.

Tucson, AZ (for now, USAF might relocate me)

Named my Jee the Dirty Sheep
__________________
'93 Jeep Cherokee Sport
5.5" RE Long Arm
Warn Hub and Chromeolly Dana 30
Ford 9" w/ Mini Spool
Toyo Open Country M/T's 33-13.50/R15
Warn Bumpers (Both)
d-man5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:05 PM   #39
Carlson99xj
Registered User
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 181
Dj Carlson

Holdin it down in the 402, Lincoln, NE

Nowhere to wheel...
__________________
99 xj sport aka BLACK BETTY
Carlson99xj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:06 PM   #40
96_XJ_Country
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 62
AJ from Aurora, IL

I like to eat, eat, eat, apples and bananas.
__________________
[B]1996 [COLOR="DarkGreen"]XJ[/COLOR] Country
Rusty's Intake
BFG All Terrain
[COLOR="DarkGreen"]Green Jeep Club Member #145[/COLOR][/B]
96_XJ_Country is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:15 PM   #41
jerryjeeper
Old Jeep Guy
1990 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ottawa Lake, Michigan
Posts: 1,223
JerryJeeper
Ottawa Lake, Mi.
Retired Jeep Plant manager, we built several million XJ's at the factory and finally got to build on for the Trails.
6.5" RE long arm with 33" MTZ's on MT Classics. Love to make modifications that improve capability.


jerryjeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:18 PM   #42
vx1kxj
Registered User
2000 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: warwick, rhode island
Posts: 733
vx1kxj
Kelsey Gallagher
warwick, Rhode island
my xj made it up rattlesnake gutter
__________________
00 xj clayton 3 link and yadda yadda yadda...
vx1kxj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2008, 10:32 PM   #43
littleblackXj
Registered User
1993 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Santa Rosa
Posts: 795
Matt
Santa Rosa, CA

I know everyone at the local smothers, autozone and 4 wheel parts on a first name basis.
__________________
1993 Jeep Cherokee
Rubicon Express 4.5" Lift
33" Wrangler Duratracs
30/44 4.88s Disks all around
Rear Detroit/Open front
littleblackXj is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2008, 08:34 AM   #44
BadHammers
Registered User
2013 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Collinsville, Oklahoma
Posts: 291
Simon Alexander
Owasso, Oklahoma
BadHammers is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-04-2008, 09:49 AM   #45
Cherokeegrrl
Registered User
1992 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,249
Lavern,
Atlantic City, NJ
Very likely the only person in this city with a non-stock Cherokee. We turn heads, LOL. I was born on an island & I love to play Table Tennis (not Pingpong) . Look for me on the rocks at Rausch Creek!

Last edited by Cherokeegrrl; 09-07-2008 at 07:06 AM..
Cherokeegrrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads





Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.