91 or 96 - JeepForum.com

LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 7 Old 08-05-2013, 02:19 PM Thread Starter
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Marietta
Posts: 1
91 or 96

I'm a potentially new Cherokee owner. I'm trying to decide between similar models, one from 91 and the other 96. Both are sport 4wd, inline 6, 4.0. The 91 has 160,000 miles and is selling for $1400. The 96 has 218,000 and is selling for 2100. Both have extensive service records, but the 96 looks nicer (possibly simply because it is newer). Otherwise, they are comparable. I'm just looking for a reliable around town tank. I want something that isn't going to start slowing breaking down. Any advice on which to take and why? Thanks for the help

Dscott is offline  
Sponsored Links
post #2 of 7 Old 08-05-2013, 03:45 PM
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Gurnee
Posts: 661
Many different things you can base your decision off of. 96 is OBD2 and the 91 is OBD1. Depending on your area, the 91 may not require emission testing as opposed to the 96, which most likely does require it.

If maintenance records are good between the 2, mileage is just a number. These motors are very strong and if taken care of, can see in excess of 300K.

Check both for rust! The floors and rocker panels are very common. Although youre from down south, it can still present itself as an issue because of the lower layer below the carpet holding water and rotting out the floors.

And finally, have them both inspected by a mechanic. On vehicles this old, its always good practice to have them checked out so you don't miss anything. If its a good/reliable car, the seller should have no problem with getting it checked out. If it is a problem with them, that's usually a good sign not to purchase the vehicle.

1996 Jeep Cherokee- Project-- Rusty's 8in long arm, SYE kit, Teraflex driveshaft, Cragar soft 8's 15x10 with 33x12.5 Firestone Destination MT's, Eaton Tru Trac in the front
psychoteen101 is offline  
post #3 of 7 Old 08-05-2013, 05:45 PM
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Whitesburg
Posts: 5,293
1991 is non HO and renix controlled.

1996 is OBD2 controlled and in my opinion a more reliable system.

Ultimately tho you are the one buying it and your the one there looking at each one. You have to make the best decision you can.

Sent from my phone

95' XJ Country - Stock Skids - D30/D35 Limited Slip - 3" Lift - 31x10.50R15 - 4.0 HO - AX15 - NP231

98' XJ Classic - D30/C8.25 - 4.5" RC Lift - 33x12.50R15 - 4.0 HO - AW4 - NP231
Originally Posted by Azzy View Post
You can tell the character of a person in how they treat someone who can do nothing for them.
Holder350 is offline  
post #4 of 7 Old 08-05-2013, 11:47 PM
Registered User
1996 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Huntingdon
Posts: 34
IMO it would boil down to condition I.e, as mentioned earlier , rust. I would go after the 96 because it's obd2, and you said the 96 was nicer, it's all preference really although the 91 is cheaper with less miles the 96 is in nicer condition with possibly less rust IF any between the two
96xjKing is offline  
post #5 of 7 Old 08-06-2013, 03:57 PM
Web Wheeler
mschi772's Avatar
1997 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Racine
Posts: 3,204
Originally Posted by Holder350 View Post
1991 is non HO and renix controlled.

1996 is OBD2 controlled and in my opinion a more reliable system.

Ultimately tho you are the one buying it and your the one there looking at each one. You have to make the best decision you can.

Sent from my phone
91 is the first year of the OBD1 HO engine.

There are a decent number of VERY minor differences in these years the biggest of which are the computer and the air bag--yeah, the biggest differences aren't really even that big. My advice: simply choose based on condition and price.

Build Thread -- http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f177/whats-chrokeese-build-thread-2525690/
mschi772 is offline  
post #6 of 7 Old 08-06-2013, 07:00 PM
Motorcharge's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 13,665
96 if it's in better shape because it's got a number of 97+ features in the older body style. The best being that the seat mounts are the same as 97+ XJs, as well as ZJs and WJs making swapping in nicer seats a lot easier. If the 91 is in better shape I'd go for it though.

Originally Posted by Ron Swanson
There is no such thing as bad weather. Only inadequate clothing and transportation.
Motorcharge is offline  
post #7 of 7 Old 08-10-2013, 12:39 AM
Registered User
1991 XJ Cherokee 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Russellville
Posts: 155
I have a '91 and it was the first year for the HO OBD1. I like the fact that I can read the codes with the flashing check engine light. Also, I HATE airbags. I just like the older ones. Out of the two, it was the less expensive one and had less miles. You said that the condition was comparable. Me, I'd go for the '91. It'll give you more money for upgrades.
scottmphoto is offline  

Quick Reply

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome