Quantcast Which Wrangler to get???? - Page 3 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles

Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > Wrangler General Discussion > Which Wrangler to get????

Great deals on Mickey Thompson Tires @ Jeephut.comRCV Heavy Duty Axle Shafts Now Shipping at Baseline4x4.comPoison Spyder Brawler Rockers!

Reply
Old 02-17-2010, 11:14 AM   #31
OregonVette
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by czjeeper View Post
....RE: the JK.... and I'm still waiting to see one off road around here (not saying you guys don't wheel), but if you want one I would probably get the 2 door. The 4 doors are monsters..



Correct, JK's don't wheel. None-of us know anything about Jeeps because we are all soccer moms. None of us owned Jeeps prior. We didn't upgrade because we all know that the 105 HP Yj is the best ever. A'men



Anyway... I would encourage you to take a stock JK rubi out for a hard wheeling and see just how capable they are. Or, listen to a few guys who have never actually seen a JK off road and just take their word
YouTube - Jeep JK Unlimted Rock Crawling Rausch Creek

YouTube - Jk @ The Badlands 8/11/07

YouTube - Jeep Rubicon JK

YouTube - Jeep JK Testing Snorkel

OregonVette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 11:23 AM   #32
-Zona-
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mos Eisley
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by czjeeper View Post
Personally the JK doesn't do it for me, and I'm still waiting to see one off road around here (not saying you guys don't wheel)
Quote:
Originally Posted by OregonVette View Post

Correct, JK's don't wheel. None-of us know anything about Jeeps because we are all soccer moms. None of us owned Jeeps prior. We didn't upgrade because we all know that the 105 HP Yj is the best ever. A'men
Reading comprehension much?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNate View Post
Zona and Cause. I'm halfway convinced they're the same person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cherrybomb05 View Post
Or Zona because he reminds me of charlie sheen
http://www.preparedsociety.com
-Zona- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 11:31 AM   #33
czjeeper
Web Wheeler
 
czjeeper's Avatar
1992 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Washougal, WA
Posts: 1,051
Good grief fellow. Read my post completely before getting all butt hurt.
I said I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY WHERE I WHEEL (TSF in Oregon).
I know the JK Rubicon is very capable, but isn't my thing. Just too big and fancy for my taste.
__________________
US Army combat vet
Armed Forces Jeeps Member #125
Red Jeep Club Member #251

In the Portland/Vancouver area?
Check 'em out! Piston's Wild Motorsports Club

Click here for 2.5L AX5 to AX15 swap
czjeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 11:57 AM   #34
OregonVette
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
Ha! I'm cool I'm cool. I love the "my jeep is better than your Jeep" threads. Guys get pretty opinionated and emotional about it.


Anyway... When it's time to upgrade from your Yj, I hope you give the JK a chance. You might agree like many of us former non-believers, the JK, stock out of the box is pretty friggin impressive. (aside from being underpowered)








In reality, I love the JKU because I now have a wife & 2 small kids. We're outdoor people. A LJ, Tj or Yj is out of the equation. But, if you're a young dude who still lives at home or single etc. The cheaper/used Wranglers will always make sense.

but for us, the JK is




OregonVette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 02:00 PM   #35
STW
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by SAMohawk View Post
So say I had a stock TJ and a stock JK. Are you saying that it would take more work on the TJ (bigger lift, cutting, fabrication) to get to where the JK can get with a bolt on lift?
Quote:
Originally Posted by OregonVette View Post
yes
Just to be clear, it doesn't require cutting or fabrication to put a TJ on 35s. Just a good 4" lift kit will do that fine.
Not sure, but I understand that a JK can clear 35s with a spacer kit because of the way the body and wheel wells are designed, so OregonVette is right about it requiring a larger lift to clear 35s on a TJ.

That said, don't most JK drivers say running 35s on a spacer lift is a little inadequate, and a 4" lift is the best way to clear 35s on a JK too?

The other likely issues with clearing 35s--axle upgrades, drive-line issues, brake upgrades, steering upgrades--are pretty similar between TJs/LJs and JKs.

There are lots of good reasons to get a JK depending on what you like in a Jeep. The extra width inside is a plus for lots of people. I remember how tight side to side the TJ seemed the first time I drove one. I prefer it that way now, and wouldn't give up my TJ but I know it's an issue for some people. And the extra width on the outside makes the JK less tippy, and is an advantage on some trails (while being a hindrance for some people who want the narrower width--an advantage on some of my trails).

JKs are also finished inside more nicely. The extra room inside a JK is a useable difference even between the two short-wheelbase versions. Of course, having a four door makes all the difference for someone who needs a workable family car. My TJ worked fine for my children when small but required some patience, and is fine now they are big. But a four door makes it easy to put a kid in a child seat in back (not easy in a lifted TJ). One caution--unless they've fixed this, the way the pass. seat flips forward on the two door JK is limiting and makes it very diffcult to get into the back seat through the door. I tried twice and I'm 5'11, 180, agileand didn't manage it. By contrast, the TJ pass. seat goes forward well and makes it easy to get in the back. Jeep engineers overlooked this problem, assuming that people who actually needed to use the back seat would get the four door. My TJ's back seat's not there very often, but when it is, it's important for my passengers to climb in there easily.

We should all give thanks that the JK came out before the crisis of the last year, because it gave us a great continuation of the Wrangler. For me, it's too big and doesn't have what I like in the TJ, but wow am I glad the Wrangler is continuing (for now). If the JK hadn't been released, I bet the first thing to get dumped at Chrysler would have been the TJ. And if they were to try to re-vamp the TJ in the current auto climate, they'd have gutted it badly, whereas the JK is a totally competant, creditable, excellent Jeep that carries on most of the best things about the TJ and improves a few TJ things.

To me, (assuming new vs. used is not the main issue) the key difference in choosing between TJs/LJs and JKs is room and size.

A word on the Rubicon: If 35s and D44 axles are going to be enough for you, then the Rubicon (either TJ or JK) will save you a lot of trouble and money. Even if you found a non-Rubicon with a rear 44, you'd still need new gears and lockers whereas the Rubicon has great lockers, and the 4.10 gears will work with 35s well enough for you to take some time to decide if you want to regear. Some people like the 4.10s with 35s, but they are a minimum gear ratio for 35s, so with a non-Rubicon you'd definately be spending a lot of money changing gears. Then the t-case ratios on the Rubicon is a nice upgrade too. The Rubicon suspension parts you change out for a lift are the same as the regular TJ/JK suspension parts, so it's not wasting any special Rubicon stuff to lift it.
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274
STW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 04:02 PM   #36
Hussler
Web Wheeler
 
Hussler's Avatar
1992 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: utica, new york
Posts: 4,709
Its sad the only SA jeep left is the wrangler. The era of the large off roading community is ending, cutting out many newcomers and people of a lower income. In 10 years a majority of the xj/zj/wj crowd will be gone limiting people to just buying wrangler which will raise the "used price" of wranglers to the point where "there wont be enough to go around."
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by chris87xj View Post
Sometimes a restoration project is a labor of love, at which point cost, time, and labor involved become irrelevant.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BorderC View Post
I see you also twizzled your scart lead. Well done! :thumbsup:
92 XJ with ARB's, 4.5 lift, too much armor, 33's and some other garbage

My softop/hardtop XJ build!!

http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f177/my-hardtop-softop-xj-build-1179593/

My build thread:
http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f11/husslers-2-door-build-thread-988458/
Hussler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 04:15 PM   #37
OregonVette
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
^^ that's true. Hopefully (and by all accounts) the wrangler is still relatively affordable used (non JK). There is a sweet late 90's wrangler for 1599.00 near my house. It'd be fun to have a 100% dedicated off road jeep to mess around in.
OregonVette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 04:28 PM   #38
STW
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by hussler737 View Post
Its sad the only SA jeep left is the wrangler. The era of the large off roading community is ending, cutting out many newcomers and people of a lower income. In 10 years a majority of the xj/zj/wj crowd will be gone limiting people to just buying wrangler which will raise the "used price" of wranglers to the point where "there wont be enough to go around."
True. All the Suzikis Samis are gone. Those were the days when the TJ was the big vehical on the trail The FJ40s left around are so expensive they're mostly pimped out mall cruisers now (apologies to those still wheeling in FJs). To have a healthy off-road communitity, you need to have inexpensive trail-ready models that don't have many limits on being built large.

What else is there out there (available new) besides the JK?
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274
STW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 05:37 PM   #39
-Zona-
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mos Eisley
Posts: 2,427
Quote:
That said, don't most JK drivers say running 35s on a spacer lift is a little inadequate, and a 4" lift is the best way to clear 35s on a JK too?
A 2.5" is the going height for 35s for a JK, I plan on going 3.25" however just for piece of mind.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrNate View Post
Zona and Cause. I'm halfway convinced they're the same person.
Quote:
Originally Posted by cherrybomb05 View Post
Or Zona because he reminds me of charlie sheen
http://www.preparedsociety.com
-Zona- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 06:19 PM   #40
2006_Sport
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 6,208
I don't get why people still question/hate on the JK. I love those damn things. I want me a lifted 4 door soft top on 35s....WIN, and i drive a TJ so what does that say?
__________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS
2006 Jeep Wrangler|BDS|BFGoodrich|Uniden|Upol|HiLift|Cragar| Hella|Alpine|JKS|PoisonSpyder|Delta|Aussie Locker|Bluetorch Fab|Novak|Trail Gear

-Zach
2006_Sport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 06:47 PM   #41
STW
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006sport View Post
I don't get why people still question/hate on the JK. I love those damn things. I want me a lifted 4 door soft top on 35s....WIN, and i drive a TJ so what does that say?
Didn't hear much hate on this thread--maybe I ignore it too easily now.
Prefering the TJ isn't hating the JK, though, if you're referring to me. The JK is a great Wrangler like I said above, with many advantages.

But if you're really asking, a couple reasons I prefer the TJ are the smaller size, and the flat sided body panels.

Guess that means I prefer small and flat over big and curvey. Ouch. That sounds like a mistake but works for Jeeps.

Neither has much to do with offroad performance, where TJs and JKs seem pretty even to me.

I could also give you reasons to prefer the CJ-7 over the TJ. Then reasons to prefer the Willys over the CJ-7. Every time they redesign the Jeep they make improvement, but good qualities are always left behind. Maybe the YJ is the only exception (apologies), but I'm sure glad we had the YJ too, because it continued and saved the Wrangler/basic Jeep, when consumer safety people and economic naysayers were calling for it to become extinct.

Willys, CJ, YJ, TJ, JK--like Goldilocks, you gotta pick the one that's just right for you.
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274
STW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 08:38 PM   #42
Axl Jack
Registered User
1994 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Old Forge, PA (Scranton)
Posts: 2,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by czjeeper View Post
Also, I read something about JK's going to IFS, so I would recommend you get a new one quick.
IFS? BLASPHEMY!

Quote:
Originally Posted by OregonVette
We didn't upgrade because we all know that the 105 HP Yj is the best ever. A'men
Hey, hey now. 181 HP and 230 ft lbs torque. Quite powerful engine compared to other SUV's of the day. (Later on in the TJ it got bumped up to 190 HP and 235 ft lbs.)
__________________
94 YJ w/ stuff. All the work/money I put into it, and the comment I get most is my $20 mod: "Hand throttle?!? That's awesome."
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmcanally View Post
You know you drive a YJ when it is no longer getting older, but slowly becoming brand new part by part.
Axl Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2010, 10:44 PM   #43
2006_Sport
Registered User
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 6,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by STW View Post
Didn't hear much hate on this thread--maybe I ignore it too easily now.
Prefering the TJ isn't hating the JK, though, if you're referring to me. The JK is a great Wrangler like I said above, with many advantages.

But if you're really asking, a couple reasons I prefer the TJ are the smaller size, and the flat sided body panels.

Guess that means I prefer small and flat over big and curvey. Ouch. That sounds like a mistake but works for Jeeps.

Neither has much to do with offroad performance, where TJs and JKs seem pretty even to me.

I could also give you reasons to prefer the CJ-7 over the TJ. Then reasons to prefer the Willys over the CJ-7. Every time they redesign the Jeep they make improvement, but good qualities are always left behind. Maybe the YJ is the only exception (apologies), but I'm sure glad we had the YJ too, because it continued and saved the Wrangler/basic Jeep, when consumer safety people and economic naysayers were calling for it to become extinct.

Willys, CJ, YJ, TJ, JK--like Goldilocks, you gotta pick the one that's just right for you.
Wasn't referring to you. In threads like this the JK gets TRASHED all the time.
__________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS
2006 Jeep Wrangler|BDS|BFGoodrich|Uniden|Upol|HiLift|Cragar| Hella|Alpine|JKS|PoisonSpyder|Delta|Aussie Locker|Bluetorch Fab|Novak|Trail Gear

-Zach
2006_Sport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 12:25 AM   #44
trw
King of the hill
 
trw's Avatar
2011 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 1,701
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006sport View Post
Wasn't referring to you. In threads like this the JK gets TRASHED all the time.
thats because any Jeep that doesnt look like or resemble a CJ isn't a real Jeep square headlights, the modern departure of the JK.......

I love my CJ, but I also love the far better suspension on my YJ, EFI, better brakes, better frame, better LIGHTs (those old roundies will never match the light my squares lay on the road) hated the gokart tires and decreased ground clearance though, but it wasn't hard to fix that.....

The JK doesn't have those issues and the purists still slam it. It is totally beyond me. I know if I had a choice between a TJ and a JK, I'd get the JK in a heart beat, and if I could REALLY have any JK I would take a J8!
__________________
Jeep garage:
2011 Jeep Wrangler JK - 33" BFG KM2s, 2.5" RC BB, ARB bumper, IPF 900XS, Superwinch EPI 9.0
1995 Jeep Wrangler - 4 cyl, 2.5" lift, BFG AT 30s, Ford 8.8, SYE+CV, AX15 swap, ARB snorkel, Aussie locker + loads more - sold
1978 Jeep CJ-7 - 304 V8, TH400 auto and quadratrac
2007 Jeep Liberty - Mother's Jeep, BFG ATs and....mud?
trw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2010, 08:01 AM   #45
BigOrange90YJ
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Huntsville, TX
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by trw View Post
thats because any Jeep that doesnt look like or resemble a CJ isn't a real Jeep square headlights, the modern departure of the JK.......

I love my CJ, but I also love the far better suspension on my YJ, EFI, better brakes, better frame, better LIGHTs (those old roundies will never match the light my squares lay on the road) hated the gokart tires and decreased ground clearance though, but it wasn't hard to fix that.....

The JK doesn't have those issues and the purists still slam it. It is totally beyond me. I know if I had a choice between a TJ and a JK, I'd get the JK in a heart beat, and if I could REALLY have any JK I would take a J8!
amen
__________________
Currently Jeepless, if you get too frustrated with yours I'll take it off your hands.
BigOrange90YJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply
Thread Tools


Suggested Threads




Glock Forum



Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.

Copyright © Group Builder, Inc - All Rights Reserved