|
|
|
|
#31 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
![]() Correct, JK's don't wheel. None-of us know anything about Jeeps because we are all soccer moms. None of us owned Jeeps prior. We didn't upgrade because we all know that the 105 HP Yj is the best ever. A'men ![]() Anyway... I would encourage you to take a stock JK rubi out for a hard wheeling and see just how capable they are. Or, listen to a few guys who have never actually seen a JK off road and just take their word ![]() YouTube - Jeep JK Unlimted Rock Crawling Rausch Creek YouTube - Jk @ The Badlands 8/11/07 YouTube - Jeep Rubicon JK YouTube - Jeep JK Testing Snorkel
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.preparedsociety.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Web Wheeler
|
Good grief fellow. Read my post completely before getting all butt hurt.
I said I HAVEN'T SEEN ANY WHERE I WHEEL (TSF in Oregon). I know the JK Rubicon is very capable, but isn't my thing. Just too big and fancy for my taste.
__________________
US Army combat vet Armed Forces Jeeps Member #125 Red Jeep Club Member #251 In the Portland/Vancouver area? Check 'em out! Piston's Wild Motorsports Club Click here for 2.5L AX5 to AX15 swap |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
|
Ha! I'm cool I'm cool. I love the "my jeep is better than your Jeep" threads. Guys get pretty opinionated and emotional about it.
![]() Anyway... When it's time to upgrade from your Yj, I hope you give the JK a chance. You might agree like many of us former non-believers, the JK, stock out of the box is pretty friggin impressive. (aside from being underpowered) ![]() ![]() In reality, I love the JKU because I now have a wife & 2 small kids. We're outdoor people. A LJ, Tj or Yj is out of the equation. But, if you're a young dude who still lives at home or single etc. The cheaper/used Wranglers will always make sense. but for us, the JK is ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Not sure, but I understand that a JK can clear 35s with a spacer kit because of the way the body and wheel wells are designed, so OregonVette is right about it requiring a larger lift to clear 35s on a TJ. That said, don't most JK drivers say running 35s on a spacer lift is a little inadequate, and a 4" lift is the best way to clear 35s on a JK too? The other likely issues with clearing 35s--axle upgrades, drive-line issues, brake upgrades, steering upgrades--are pretty similar between TJs/LJs and JKs. There are lots of good reasons to get a JK depending on what you like in a Jeep. The extra width inside is a plus for lots of people. I remember how tight side to side the TJ seemed the first time I drove one. I prefer it that way now, and wouldn't give up my TJ but I know it's an issue for some people. And the extra width on the outside makes the JK less tippy, and is an advantage on some trails (while being a hindrance for some people who want the narrower width--an advantage on some of my trails). JKs are also finished inside more nicely. The extra room inside a JK is a useable difference even between the two short-wheelbase versions. Of course, having a four door makes all the difference for someone who needs a workable family car. My TJ worked fine for my children when small but required some patience, and is fine now they are big. But a four door makes it easy to put a kid in a child seat in back (not easy in a lifted TJ). One caution--unless they've fixed this, the way the pass. seat flips forward on the two door JK is limiting and makes it very diffcult to get into the back seat through the door. I tried twice and I'm 5'11, 180, agile and didn't manage it. By contrast, the TJ pass. seat goes forward well and makes it easy to get in the back. Jeep engineers overlooked this problem, assuming that people who actually needed to use the back seat would get the four door. My TJ's back seat's not there very often, but when it is, it's important for my passengers to climb in there easily.We should all give thanks that the JK came out before the crisis of the last year, because it gave us a great continuation of the Wrangler. For me, it's too big and doesn't have what I like in the TJ, but wow am I glad the Wrangler is continuing (for now). If the JK hadn't been released, I bet the first thing to get dumped at Chrysler would have been the TJ. And if they were to try to re-vamp the TJ in the current auto climate, they'd have gutted it badly, whereas the JK is a totally competant, creditable, excellent Jeep that carries on most of the best things about the TJ and improves a few TJ things. To me, (assuming new vs. used is not the main issue) the key difference in choosing between TJs/LJs and JKs is room and size. A word on the Rubicon: If 35s and D44 axles are going to be enough for you, then the Rubicon (either TJ or JK) will save you a lot of trouble and money. Even if you found a non-Rubicon with a rear 44, you'd still need new gears and lockers whereas the Rubicon has great lockers, and the 4.10 gears will work with 35s well enough for you to take some time to decide if you want to regear. Some people like the 4.10s with 35s, but they are a minimum gear ratio for 35s, so with a non-Rubicon you'd definately be spending a lot of money changing gears. Then the t-case ratios on the Rubicon is a nice upgrade too. The Rubicon suspension parts you change out for a lift are the same as the regular TJ/JK suspension parts, so it's not wasting any special Rubicon stuff to lift it.
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
Web Wheeler
|
Its sad the only SA jeep left is the wrangler. The era of the large off roading community is ending, cutting out many newcomers and people of a lower income. In 10 years a majority of the xj/zj/wj crowd will be gone limiting people to just buying wrangler which will raise the "used price" of wranglers to the point where "there wont be enough to go around."
__________________
Quote:
My softop/hardtop XJ build!! http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f177/my-hardtop-softop-xj-build-1179593/ My build thread: http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f11/husslers-2-door-build-thread-988458/ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: peoplez socialist portland Estados Unidos de América
Posts: 1,150
|
^^ that's true. Hopefully (and by all accounts) the wrangler is still relatively affordable used (non JK). There is a sweet late 90's wrangler for 1599.00 near my house. It'd be fun to have a 100% dedicated off road jeep to mess around in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
The FJ40s left around are so expensive they're mostly pimped out mall cruisers now (apologies to those still wheeling in FJs). To have a healthy off-road communitity, you need to have inexpensive trail-ready models that don't have many limits on being built large. What else is there out there (available new) besides the JK?
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.preparedsociety.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
Registered User
|
I don't get why people still question/hate on the JK. I love those damn things. I want me a lifted 4 door soft top on 35s....WIN, and i drive a TJ so what does that say?
__________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS 2006 Jeep Wrangler|BDS|BFGoodrich|Uniden|Upol|HiLift|Cragar| Hella|Alpine|JKS|PoisonSpyder|Delta|Aussie Locker|Bluetorch Fab|Novak|Trail Gear -Zach
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
Prefering the TJ isn't hating the JK, though, if you're referring to me. The JK is a great Wrangler like I said above, with many advantages. But if you're really asking, a couple reasons I prefer the TJ are the smaller size, and the flat sided body panels. Guess that means I prefer small and flat over big and curvey. Ouch. That sounds like a mistake but works for Jeeps. Neither has much to do with offroad performance, where TJs and JKs seem pretty even to me. I could also give you reasons to prefer the CJ-7 over the TJ. Then reasons to prefer the Willys over the CJ-7. Every time they redesign the Jeep they make improvement, but good qualities are always left behind. Maybe the YJ is the only exception (apologies), but I'm sure glad we had the YJ too, because it continued and saved the Wrangler/basic Jeep, when consumer safety people and economic naysayers were calling for it to become extinct. Willys, CJ, YJ, TJ, JK--like Goldilocks, you gotta pick the one that's just right for you.
__________________
2000 2.5 TJ, 5spd, 33s, 8274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#42 | ||
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Old Forge, PA (Scranton)
Posts: 2,494
|
Quote:
![]() Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#43 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
__________________
SUPPORT THE TROOPS 2006 Jeep Wrangler|BDS|BFGoodrich|Uniden|Upol|HiLift|Cragar| Hella|Alpine|JKS|PoisonSpyder|Delta|Aussie Locker|Bluetorch Fab|Novak|Trail Gear -Zach
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#44 | |
|
King of the hill
|
Quote:
square headlights, the modern departure of the JK.......I love my CJ, but I also love the far better suspension on my YJ, EFI, better brakes, better frame, better LIGHTs (those old roundies will never match the light my squares lay on the road) hated the gokart tires and decreased ground clearance though, but it wasn't hard to fix that..... The JK doesn't have those issues and the purists still slam it. It is totally beyond me. I know if I had a choice between a TJ and a JK, I'd get the JK in a heart beat, and if I could REALLY have any JK I would take a J8!
__________________
Jeep garage: 2011 Jeep Wrangler JK - 33" BFG KM2s, 2.5" RC BB, ARB bumper, IPF 900XS, Superwinch EPI 9.0 1995 Jeep Wrangler - 4 cyl, 2.5" lift, BFG AT 30s, Ford 8.8, SYE+CV, AX15 swap, ARB snorkel, Aussie locker + loads more - sold 1978 Jeep CJ-7 - 304 V8, TH400 auto and quadratrac 2007 Jeep Liberty - Mother's Jeep, BFG ATs and....mud? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#45 | |
|
Registered User
|
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Currently Jeepless, if you get too frustrated with yours I'll take it off your hands. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
|
| Suggested Threads |
|