Rubicon!!! - Page 2 - JeepForum.com
Search  
Sign Up   Today's Posts
User: Pass: Remember?
Advertise Here
Jeep Home Jeep Forum Jeep Classifieds Jeep Registry JeepSpace Jeep Reviews Jeep Gallery Jeep Clubs Jeep Groups Jeep Videos Jeep Events Jeep Articles
Go Back JeepForum.com > Models > Jeep Wrangler Forums > Wrangler General Discussion > Rubicon!!!

FS: 2007-2013 Jeep Wrangler "HALO" Angel Eye KitFlowmaster's Force II Axle-back exhaust system for the 201FS: Wranger BRIGHT License Plate LED! Just $3! Great value

Reply
Unread 09-01-2013, 08:45 PM   #16
Tom95YJ
[] Eye'd Jeep Connoisseur
 
Tom95YJ's Avatar
1999 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 8,209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeep_Fanatic
Rubi what? they suck, mainly cause they ain't got a 4.0! Chrysler 3.6L motors aint got no balls.

get a '95 YJ, best wrangler ever made.
The 3.8 is gutless the 3.6 is much better but it does lack the low end that a I6 has. My 4.2l Powered YJ has better low end then my XJ that has a header and 2.5" exhaust from the collector back. But in the Hiway the XJ will walk away from the YJ.

__________________
'89 YJ The Smurf Build Thread
'99 XJ Black Betty Build Thread
Tom95YJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-01-2013, 09:00 PM   #17
Jeep_Fanatic
Registered User
2012 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom95YJ View Post
The 3.8 is gutless the 3.6 is much better but it does lack the low end that a I6 has. My 4.2l Powered YJ has better low end then my XJ that has a header and 2.5" exhaust from the collector back. But in the Hiway the XJ will walk away from the YJ.

so..

4.2 > 4.0 > 3.8 > 3.6 > 2.5.....

im sensing a pattern here, i wonder where the 3.7L fits in

my experience having driven all of these wranglers, the newer the worse..
__________________
-Rescue Green '12 Compass Sport 4x2 2.4L CVT daily driver
-New jeep coming soon
Jeep_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-02-2013, 11:05 AM   #18
try2holdmywheel
Registered User
2005 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Here and there, WA, WA
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeep_Fanatic View Post
so..

4.2 > 4.0 > 3.8 > 3.6 > 2.5.....

im sensing a pattern here, i wonder where the 3.7L fits in

my experience having driven all of these wranglers, the newer the worse..
I think you missed it. From what he stated, it should be 4.2>4.0>3.6>3.8>2.5.
__________________
'05 LJR (For Sale)
tiny.cc/akscdx
try2holdmywheel is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-02-2013, 12:01 PM   #19
Jeep_Fanatic
Registered User
2012 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by try2holdmywheel View Post
I think you missed it. From what he stated, it should be 4.2>4.0>3.6>3.8>2.5.
typo, thanks
__________________
-Rescue Green '12 Compass Sport 4x2 2.4L CVT daily driver
-New jeep coming soon
Jeep_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-02-2013, 07:22 PM   #20
grogie
M-F: Cell Block #4533
 
grogie's Avatar
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Indy
Posts: 7,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by biffgnar View Post
Rubicons are a great fit for a certain slice of jeep customers. Only you really know whether you fit that slice. On one end of the spectrum you have most of the jeep customer base where the Rubicon is overkill. They'll never use the things that they are paying a premium for. Then at the other end you have a small slice of people who will end up modifying the vehicle so much that they'll strip out a lot of the parts they paid a premium for so they would have been better off starting with a Sport. In between those two groups is a slice where they'll use it enough to justify the expense but have limited plans beyond.
That's good advice. If one is in that middle between those two groups, as mentioned, a Rubicon makes a lot of sense.

I remember when the JKs were first released, in my area I saw a number of stock, garage kept TJ Rubis hit the used car lots. (Which was great for the next owner.)
__________________

Red Jeep Club #345
2006 TJ Sport
2004 KJ Limited
2013 Off-Road Trailer

grogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2013, 12:40 PM   #21
paroxysym
Registered User
2007 WK 
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, Md.
Posts: 3,689
personally, id go LJ Rubi.. the price of JKs right now is ridiculous, i couldnt imagine paying what dealers ask for most rubicons these days.
__________________
2007.5 WK Laredo 4.7
OEM+
paroxysym is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2013, 12:57 PM   #22
Jeep_Fanatic
Registered User
2012 MK Compass 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Warner Robins, Georgia
Posts: 235
Quote:
Originally Posted by paroxysym
personally, id go lj rubi.. The price of jks right now is ridiculous, i couldnt imagine paying what dealers ask for most rubicons these days.
x2
__________________
-Rescue Green '12 Compass Sport 4x2 2.4L CVT daily driver
-New jeep coming soon
Jeep_Fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-03-2013, 05:17 PM   #23
jeeprubi2005
Registered User
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: bloomsburg, pa
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeep_fanatic View Post

x2
x3
jeeprubi2005 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-05-2013, 11:00 PM   #24
COLOUXJ
Web Wheeler
2010 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Posts: 1,995
I love my Rubicon. For me it was a perfect choice as I wanted something that had lockers, extra low tcase, stronger axles, and rode well on the road. The Rubi was a perfect Jeep for me as both myself and my passengers enjoy the creature comforts it offers and is very capable offroad when I take it there.

There is a very good chance that the Jeep will be far more capable than you are. Mine with 35's and a 3" lift sure is.

(below are pictures to represent the JKUR's out there )

This kind of stuff is a lot of fun


Had to pull the LJ up the same line....

__________________
"When i die, bury me with my jeep. Its never been in a hole it can't get out of"
Black Jeep Society
My JEEP helped win a War > Your Honda mows my grass!!
Mechanical Engineers Build weapons Civil Engineers build targets

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberpyrot View Post
is it a plink plink kerrrrdunk? or more of a brrrrrconk doc doc miiiidge pang!!!? or is it a badonk ka donk? if it is the latter its just the normal fat *** of the JK

COLOUXJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-06-2013, 06:11 AM   #25
paroxysym
Registered User
2007 WK 
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, Md.
Posts: 3,689
probably wouldnt have had to if the LG was locked..
__________________
2007.5 WK Laredo 4.7
OEM+
paroxysym is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-06-2013, 11:14 AM   #26
panthermark
Registered User
2013 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Aurora, IL
Posts: 436
Quote:
Originally Posted by biffgnar View Post
Rubicons are a great fit for a certain slice of jeep customers. Only you really know whether you fit that slice. On one end of the spectrum you have most of the jeep customer base where the Rubicon is overkill. They'll never use the things that they are paying a premium for. Then at the other end you have a small slice of people who will end up modifying the vehicle so much that they'll strip out a lot of the parts they paid a premium for so they would have been better off starting with a Sport. In between those two groups is a slice where they'll use it enough to justify the expense but have limited plans beyond.
Best take on the situation ever!
__________________
Jeep - It's a Jeep thing...you wouldn't understand.
Triumph - Go your own way.

I see why I'm a loner....and I love it!
panthermark is offline   Reply With Quote




Jeep, Wrangler, Cherokee, Grand Cherokee, and other models are copyrighted and trademarked to Jeep/Chrysler Corporation. JeepForum.com is not in any way associated with Jeep or the Chrysler Corp.