If you have a TJ or JK what do you like/dislike about the 'other' one. - Page 4 - JeepForum.com
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #46 of 96 Old 07-25-2010, 02:38 PM
NKYJEEPSTER1
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: KY
Posts: 24
I have an 06 LJ Rubicon currently. I traded in an 09 JK 4door for this. WHY???? I had a few issues with mine, from the factory. Rear windows would drop 1/4" randomly, t case shift link broke, door seals leaked, could go on. This doesn t mean I didn't like it. We loved the JK as a street driver. Mine had 2.5 inch lift with 34 Super Swampers on it. The frame hangs down way to low, so to make it great off road, you have to have 35 or 37s on it with 4 to 6 inch of lift. I was always had a difficult time mainly to the ride height. The 4 door was great ridin down the HWY.

The LJ rubi is a whole different story. 3" lift with 33s and I can get where I wanna go. I have a little issue with draggin, but I m gonna tummy tuck it and fit that.

So I like them both, just depends on what you plan on doing with it in my opinion.

NKYJEEPSTER1 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #47 of 96 Old 07-25-2010, 03:52 PM
JerseyDoug
Can I go home now?
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by NKYJEEPSTER1 View Post
I have an 06 LJ Rubicon currently. I traded in an 09 JK 4door for this. WHY???? I had a few issues with mine, from the factory. Rear windows would drop 1/4" randomly, t case shift link broke, door seals leaked, could go on. This doesn t mean I didn't like it. We loved the JK as a street driver. Mine had 2.5 inch lift with 34 Super Swampers on it. The frame hangs down way to low, so to make it great off road, you have to have 35 or 37s on it with 4 to 6 inch of lift. I was always had a difficult time mainly to the ride height. The 4 door was great ridin down the HWY.

The LJ rubi is a whole different story. 3" lift with 33s and I can get where I wanna go. I have a little issue with draggin, but I m gonna tummy tuck it and fit that.

So I like them both, just depends on what you plan on doing with it in my opinion.
I'm missing something here. I may be wrong (I often am), but the lowest point on any Jeep is the diff.. So, the LJ on 33s actually rides lower than the JK on 34s. I am not questioning your experience. You have owned and driven both. I have never driven a JK. I am just trying to understand. The JK can run larger tires with less lift than a TJ due to the way it is designed (high line set-up, if I understand it correctly.) Articulation is different and I admit to not fully understanding the ins and outs of that topic.
JerseyDoug is offline  
post #48 of 96 Old 07-25-2010, 10:12 PM Thread Starter
anymanusa
Member
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Beautiful South
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by flatlander757 View Post
Hmmm... I don't think I've seen ANY posts on here about people having ANYTHING go through their grill and destroying their radiator. If you hit a deer or something you've got other problems anyways, probably bent fenders and crap too. And a deer is way too big to go "through" your grill so it sure as hell won't be getting through a plastic one. It's a surface area thing.

As far as rocks or something getting through... doubtful as well... and if something does that small, you've got an AC condenser up there to protect the radiator so it's not the end of the world.


And on top of that, I'll have this protecting the front some as well soon enough:







edit:

And with your reasoning... that would mean the stock hood is awesome since it's metal, and everyone that gets highline Durham hoods or Campbell hoods have something wrong with them. Those are plastic.
Well it just depends on what you want to be surrounded with. Me? I choose METAL, and I'm not buying a plastic hood anytime soon, although the hood would be a better choice to make plastic than a grill imho.

Yeah, the stock grill on a TJ is MUCH better than the plastic grill of a JK.

Oh, and btw, I hit a dear with my plastic grilled Cadillac, and the only thing broken was the grill. None of the metal stuff surrounding the grill was broken or even bent. So no, hitting a dear doesn't leave you with more to worry about than just breaking the grill.

Oh yeah, and p.s., wind that rope up a little better son! That looks like a birds' nest. Lol.
anymanusa is offline  
post #49 of 96 Old 07-25-2010, 11:19 PM
methmouth
Registered User
1995 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: texas
Posts: 48
[QUOTE=JIMBOX;9828997]
There doesn't have to be a comparison between the engines, we're just climbing the ladder of technology and the 3.6l v6 has enough power to maintain 70 mph, with lift and 33" tires, but I don't need power, I get great mileage and plenty of torque, especially with my Ruby xfer case------------------------------------------------------------------------------if you haven't noticed, the jk is the most stream lined wrangler ever made, which allows you to achieve high speeds.

hope lies in the smoldering rubble of empires.
methmouth is offline  
post #50 of 96 Old 07-25-2010, 11:21 PM
Pelech
Registered User
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 90
Although I only have a 4 cylinder in my TJ, still has so much power bone stock
Pelech is offline  
post #51 of 96 Old 07-26-2010, 08:07 AM
flatlander757
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dayton
Posts: 5,417
Quote:
Originally Posted by anymanusa View Post
Well it just depends on what you want to be surrounded with. Me? I choose METAL, and I'm not buying a plastic hood anytime soon, although the hood would be a better choice to make plastic than a grill imho.

Yeah, the stock grill on a TJ is MUCH better than the plastic grill of a JK.

Oh, and btw, I hit a dear with my plastic grilled Cadillac, and the only thing broken was the grill. None of the metal stuff surrounding the grill was broken or even bent. So no, hitting a dear doesn't leave you with more to worry about than just breaking the grill.

Oh yeah, and p.s., wind that rope up a little better son! That looks like a birds' nest. Lol.
Fair enough.

And that cable is thrown out... getting synthetic.

SOLDThe lumbering steel-laden pig - 2003 TJ - 40" LTBs - D60/D70HD - 5.86s - Detroit lockers - 110" wheelbase
Build thread here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2006 Sport
Being able to make vroom vroom noises in Tonys Jeep was the highlight of my life.
Currently Jeepless.
flatlander757 is offline  
post #52 of 96 Old 07-26-2010, 09:07 AM
NKYJEEPSTER1
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: KY
Posts: 24
Yes the JK is setup to run bigger tires with less lift, but pull a TJ or LJ on 33s and a JK on 33s next to each other. The JK is setup for better rollover protection or lower center of gravity. The frame rails in the middle of the JK are lower than a TJ. Now granted mine was a 4 door, it is wider and longer than the LJ. When I wheeled it, I was always rubbing the frame rails and gas tank skid on everything. I had more trouble wheeling it than I do now with the LJ. That s just my thoughts. IF you have the time and money to do a 4 door JK right, they are awesome rigs and can go with the best of them. I don t dislike them, just choose to wheel the LJ.
NKYJEEPSTER1 is offline  
post #53 of 96 Old 07-26-2010, 09:17 AM
ZeroGravity
Registered User
1991 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,927
TJ and JK?? I thought this thread was about YJ's

91 YJ
98 XJ
2 door love
The U.S. Army vaguely envisioned something bigger than a motorcycle, smaller than a truck, and undaunted by the most difficult terrain.
ZeroGravity is offline  
post #54 of 96 Old 07-26-2010, 11:24 AM
Dronac
Registered User
2008 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 775
I own a JK

JK Pros:
-Good daily driver
-Fits 33'' tires with a 2'' lift and without shooting MPG in the head
-More modern stylized interior (But NOT luxurized like the horrible new 2011 designs)
-Can maintain 80 mph easy on road trips and still get 18 mpg

JK Cons:
-Thin sheet metal everywhere
-3.8 engine

TJ Pros:
-4.0 i6
-thicker metal body
-Cheaper to buy atm

TJ Cons:
-Low MPG
-Not as great for daily driving
-requires more modification to fit the same tires as a JK

2008 Jeep JK X: auto trans, 3.73 gears, D44 rear, D30 front
Mods: 2'' Rusty's coil lift, Superchips 93 octane tune, Cobra 75 CB radio, 33'' Duratrac's, onboard air compressor
My Build Thread! ---> http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f96/dronacs-build-thread-1104134/
Dronac is offline  
post #55 of 96 Old 07-27-2010, 08:28 AM
NKYJEEPSTER1
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: KY
Posts: 24
I can say that s a fact. I m lucky to get 13-14 mpg on the road in the LJ with 33s and the JK got at least 16 with the 34s on it.
NKYJEEPSTER1 is offline  
post #56 of 96 Old 07-27-2010, 08:54 AM
Noxian
Registered User
2011 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 1,137
I was wheeling with a JK on the weekend, and he came up to and asked if I had a V8 in my 04 TJ, I said no, He asked because I made it up a sand hill on my first try that he could never make up on multiple tries. Both are Rubicons too.
Noxian is offline  
post #57 of 96 Old 07-27-2010, 09:07 AM
juiceparn
Registered User
2007 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Quincy, IL
Posts: 733
Quote:
Originally Posted by NKYJEEPSTER1 View Post
Yes the JK is setup to run bigger tires with less lift, but pull a TJ or LJ on 33s and a JK on 33s next to each other. The JK is setup for better rollover protection or lower center of gravity. The frame rails in the middle of the JK are lower than a TJ. Now granted mine was a 4 door, it is wider and longer than the LJ. When I wheeled it, I was always rubbing the frame rails and gas tank skid on everything. I had more trouble wheeling it than I do now with the LJ. That s just my thoughts. IF you have the time and money to do a 4 door JK right, they are awesome rigs and can go with the best of them. I don t dislike them, just choose to wheel the LJ.

I've drug my spare going down drop offs and can't imagine what would have happened if I had the departure angle of an LJ. I'd probably rip off the spare and ruin the tailgate. And the break over angle on a JK 4dr on 34's has to be damn close if not better than an LJ on 33's. Someone post that handy picture with the angles please. There is a lot of talking out the *** going on here.

07 JK 4DR 3.5" Rubicon Express, C gussets, Front XHD stubby, winch, Taboo Customs rear bumper with tire carrier, Taboo Customs Rock sliders.
juiceparn is offline  
post #58 of 96 Old 07-28-2010, 02:56 PM
epeck87
Registered User
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,018
i dont like the jk fender flares and i dont like that is does not have a straight 6 under the hood

Associates Degree in automotive technology
A1-A8 ASE MASTER CERTIFIED TOYOTA MECHANIC
epeck87 is offline  
post #59 of 96 Old 07-28-2010, 02:58 PM
Maverickxeo
Registered User
2002 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wetaskiwin
Posts: 2,327
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishinjeeper View Post
the JK's seem like they are made from too much plastic....only seen a few I like. I love everything about the TJ
I feel the same... and I dont like the 'minivan' engine in a Jeep.
Maverickxeo is offline  
post #60 of 96 Old 08-02-2010, 01:06 AM
DezertTJ
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Marana
Posts: 5,662
I own a 03 rubi

TJ

Likes:
* Powa!
* very comfy front seats
* easy to work on
* ***** load of aftermarket parts
* small and skinny
* body lines
* very reliable

Dislikes:
* horrible mpg
* no cargo space
* shock mounting design

JK
Likes:
* Better mpg
* more cargo space (JKU)
* larger tires easier
* the 4 door rubi on 37"+ tires

Dislikes:
* no power
* no waves
* more "non-jeepers" driving them now
* 2wd option! WTF!
* wider

sometimes i wish i had a 4 door rubi, but i will always love my tj
DezertTJ is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Whose got a 2.5? What do you like/dislike? Kota04SXT TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 16 12-09-2009 06:10 AM
Anybody dislike how Bestop (supertop) looks??? Samgler YJ Wrangler Technical Forum 32 04-14-2008 10:01 AM
DT3000's Like or Dislike stretched TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 15 07-27-2004 09:51 PM
Why the dislike of body lifts? Down&Dirty TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 20 06-09-2004 09:03 PM
starting to dislike off-roading nj666z TJ Wrangler Technical Forum 11 06-09-2004 10:54 AM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome