2012 vs 2013 - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 3 Old 06-30-2013, 01:59 PM Thread Starter
borrego
Registered User
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: San Diego
Posts: 24
2012 vs 2013

Getting ready to upgrade to a JK from my old TJ. So, with my budget at approx $23k, I find that I can buy either a '12 or '13 for roughly the same price. For instance, there is a private seller locally with a '12, fully loaded, 14k miles for $23,900. A local dealer will sell me a new '13 with just AC and Automatic Trans for $23100. So, money being equal, would y'all take a brand new car, or one with a few more options and a few more miles? Plus I've been reading on here about the dreaded 'engine tick'. Is it more likely on a 2012?
Or I suppose a 3rd choicce is to get a 2011 model with the older, slower but maybe more reliable engine, and save some $$
Sorry if this has been covered, I did a search and came up empty....
All advice greatly appreciated!

borrego is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 3 Old 06-30-2013, 03:31 PM
Breitling
Registered User
2013 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Somerset
Posts: 78
I don't think older engine anyhow better than Pentastar and I am driving second car with this engine since 2011. I am not saying it is perfect but ...

2013 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited Sport S, hardtop, white, duratracs, tons of mopar parts
2012 Mercedes Benz C350 coupe, white
Breitling is offline  
post #3 of 3 Old 07-01-2013, 08:04 AM
222Doc
Registered User
2012 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lake Havasu City
Posts: 5,853
the auto in the 011 is horrible. if you are set on a auto. compared to the new auto in the 012+ night and day. if jeep used the old 42le4speed auto even the new pentatick would be a dog. its all about gear ratio.

the tick issue is not just Jeep all platforms. I have read that they are on what seems to be the third generation of the head design. Though officially Jeep has only put the blame on possible: bad fuel, driver or possible regional conditions. The jury is not out I think. 013 few have enough miles to say, most 012 still have few miles too. most issues seem to pop up under 36K. Chrysler is still saying its less than 1%. but that is only the ones that have coded out early enough to be noticed. The 1% seems rather low amount since one could say 1% of a million motors could have about anything go wrong. This seems to be the same thing and the same issue, a bad valve/seal seat. #2 or 6. mostly 2.

I have yet to hear a real answer to this. Would be nice if some one did there own tech inspection on what failed. But being that the center cylinder on both banks. leads me to think its a heat issue. perhaps having that exhaust manifold casted into the head leads to heat migration? No one knows. Chrysler is hush lipped.

http://www.parker4wheelers.net
www.bullhead4wheelersinc.com
222Doc is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome