Been to long, time for a new jeep - JeepForum.com

View Poll Results: What do you prefer
4.0 TJ 7 100.00%
JK 0 0%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 11 Old 04-23-2014, 09:48 PM Thread Starter
zu903
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ks
Posts: 142
Been to long, time for a new jeep

Two years ago a sold my 98 wrangler to get better mileage while in college. I've regretted it ever since. I just got a good full time job and my trucks on its last leg so time to go back to the jeep side. I love the 4.0 TJ's but i was wondering about the new JK's and how they compare in power and reliability. Im gonna go test drive one this weekend. I would like to hear from someone who has owned both and what they preferred.

Thanks, Looking forward to owning a jeep again

zu903 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 11 Old 04-24-2014, 06:01 AM
WDNewman
Registered User
1989 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 1,359
TJ's are pretty good units. Of course your decision will be based on your desires, so lets see some of the things you are looking at. As in all cases, some year models are better than others, as are engines, etc. Tell us year, miles, condition, and someone on here can help you. Always remember rust is the #1 enemy, followed closely by hacked lift jobs and mods.

Hey guys, there is NO SUCH THING as RPMS. There is NO "S" in RPM.
A little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but not nearly as much as ignorance.
WDNewman is offline  
post #3 of 11 Old 04-24-2014, 10:15 AM Thread Starter
zu903
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ks
Posts: 142
Quote:
Originally Posted by WDNewman View Post
TJ's are pretty good units. Of course your decision will be based on your desires, so lets see some of the things you are looking at. As in all cases, some year models are better than others, as are engines, etc. Tell us year, miles, condition, and someone on here can help you. Always remember rust is the #1 enemy, followed closely by hacked lift jobs and mods.
It will be my daily driver but its only 10 mins of highway driving to work. Im looking for something with less than 75,000 miles. Ill do some wheeling but not allot. also yeah im trying to stay away from rust and ones with lifts i would rather put one on my self.
zu903 is offline  
post #4 of 11 Old 04-24-2014, 03:25 PM
WDNewman
Registered User
1989 YJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Central Mississippi
Posts: 1,359
Don't know what your budget is, but you should be able to find a later model, say 8 to 10 years old with that kind of mileage on it. Remember NO RUST. Oh yeah. Be sure to do your own lifts.
WDNewman is offline  
post #5 of 11 Old 04-24-2014, 07:06 PM
prakseta
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: buffalo
Posts: 1
I've had a couple TJs and one JK. Personally, I hated the JK. The 3.7 was sluggish, not like the snappy 4.0. Also, the shifting was difficult. All my jeeps have been manuals and this was by far the worst.
I'm in the market now for another Jeep and won't consider a JK.
prakseta is offline  
post #6 of 11 Old 04-24-2014, 07:59 PM
R U STUCK
Registered User
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,986
Quote:
Originally Posted by prakseta
I've had a couple TJs and one JK. Personally, I hated the JK. The 3.7 was sluggish, not like the snappy 4.0. Also, the shifting was difficult. All my jeeps have been manuals and this was by far the worst.
I'm in the market now for another Jeep and won't consider a JK.
The JK had a 3.8L the Liberty had the 3.7L. The 3.8L had 202hp the new 3.6L has 285hp. And the 4.0L had 190hp.

Sent from my iPhone using JeepForum

'04 TJ Rocky Mountain, 4" Fabtech, Sitting on 35"s
Jeep Selling Guru...
IG: R_U_STUCK
R U STUCK is offline  
post #7 of 11 Old 04-27-2014, 03:08 PM
dmill89
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Harrisburg
Posts: 863
Quote:
Originally Posted by R U STUCK View Post
The JK had a 3.8L the Liberty had the 3.7L. The 3.8L had 202hp the new 3.6L has 285hp. And the 4.0L had 190hp.

Sent from my iPhone using JeepForum
Yes, the JK had the 3.8L (2007-2011) or 3.6L (2012+). Also remember that a 2-door JK is about 500 lbs. heavier than a TJ, that combined with poor gear ratios (especially with the auto) made 3.8L JKs absolute dogs compared to 4.0L TJs despite the 3.8L being slightly more powerful on paper. The 3.6L Pentastar (2012+) JKs are pretty quick, but the 3.6L is a modern DOHC engine which will make maintenance and repairs more difficult/expensive.
dmill89 is offline  
post #8 of 11 Old 04-27-2014, 04:34 PM
222Doc
Registered User
2012 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Lake Havasu City
Posts: 5,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmill89 View Post
Yes, the JK had the 3.8L (2007-2011) or 3.6L (2012+). Also remember that a 2-door JK is about 500 lbs. heavier than a TJ, that combined with poor gear ratios (especially with the auto) made 3.8L JKs absolute dogs compared to 4.0L TJs despite the 3.8L being slightly more powerful on paper. The 3.6L Pentastar (2012+) JKs are pretty quick, but the 3.6L is a modern DOHC engine which will make maintenance and repairs more difficult/expensive.
the old cj2 was like 2200. but could not get to 60mph
2005 weight of a tj 3200
Curb weight of a 2010 jk 3782
the main reason for the 42le being slower was the first gear in that auto was just not enough gear
Curb weight of a 2012 JK 3760 is the fastest jeep made ever stock
2 doors, the 4d is about 500 pounds more. But that would be expected with the long wheel base and extra doors

http://www.parker4wheelers.net
www.bullhead4wheelersinc.com
222Doc is online now  
post #9 of 11 Old 04-30-2014, 03:08 PM Thread Starter
zu903
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ks
Posts: 142
I've been really busy i ended up forgetting about the thread. I went on a bunch of test drives and to a bunch of dealers looking For a TJ and had no luck they have been wheeled to much, bad lift, or rust. So i figured ill test a few JK's and see if i like it. Well long story short i got a 2007 2dr JK last night its a manual with 62K. Its a much better fit for what i'm wanting right now, i'm not gonna be doing any wheeling (want to eventually get a Cherokee for that) its just a daily driver. To me it felt about the same as far as power goes as the TJ. So far i love the jeep and im glad to be back in a jeep and out of my old ranger. ill post some pics tonight.
zu903 is offline  
post #10 of 11 Old 05-01-2014, 02:01 PM Thread Starter
zu903
Registered User
1998 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ks
Posts: 142
Thats what i ended up getting
zu903 is offline  
post #11 of 11 Old 05-07-2014, 11:28 AM
Jughead
Registered User
2011 WK 
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Free stuff is usually too expensive
Posts: 135
Quote:
Originally Posted by zu903 View Post
Thats what i ended up getting
Sweet, nice color.

2003 Rubicon
2011 Laredo "X" V-6
2011 Laredo Limited Hemi
1970 Corvette Stingray 454
Jughead is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome