About to buy a Wrangler, but which one? - JeepForum.com

 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #1 of 14 Old 05-05-2008, 08:09 PM Thread Starter
BobbySwiz
Registered User
2009 JK Wrangler 
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Bronx
Posts: 174
About to buy a Wrangler, but which one?

I am looking into buying a jeep wrangler. I like both the TJ's and the new JK Model aswell. I can go either way honestly. If i get a TJ it's gonna be an 06', and if i go JK maybe 08' or hold off till 09'.

My question is, which is better? I don't offroad really at all, the beach, but that is nothing hardcore. I want to compare engines. Which is better? I know the JK's have only been out for a couple of years, but how does the new 3.8L engine compare to the older Inline 6?

Anyone who has knowledge on this subject, your help is greatly appreciated, thank you.

BobbySwiz is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #2 of 14 Old 05-05-2008, 08:11 PM
robncar
Registered User
 
robncar's Avatar
2005 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: La Verne
Posts: 8,492
If you don't plan to offroad, might as well go with the JK. It's the fav of the soccer moms and nothing crawls the mall better.

http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f9/diy-alignment-kit-steps-w-pics-2264465/
robncar is offline  
post #3 of 14 Old 05-05-2008, 08:25 PM
MEnginerd
Registered User
2006 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 204
I could have easily gotten a JK, but liked the looks of the TJ better. Well actually the LJ to fufill my scrambler lust from when i was younger.

There are some nice things on the JK suspension, like the shock and other bracket placements but if you aren't gonna wheel it that won't really matter. JK will cost a lot more to modify, if that matters to you.

Test drive them both...

-Brent

- 06 LJ Rubicon 34" LTB's / 33" MTZs, OME Springs/Shocks, RE FTB, JKS RTB & 1.25BL, Brown Dog MML, Fabtech F Bump, Warn M8000 on AtoZ plate, ORF R Bumper & Rack, AR CAI, Banks Catback, Hi-Lift, Midland 75-822, Dual MF1050 Comp, Clayton Skids, Kilby Gas Skid
- 94 Firebird Formula, 02 Softail Deuce, 86 GSXR750
- RIP 97 TJ, 83 CJ7, 87 TType
MEnginerd is offline  
post #4 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 04:24 AM
TheBoogieman
WARNING! Do not HAND feed
 
TheBoogieman's Avatar
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: CharlottesHELL
Posts: 32,865
Quote:
Originally Posted by robncar View Post
If you don't plan to offroad, might as well go with the JK. It's the fav of the soccer moms and nothing crawls the mall better.
and the interior is purdy too.
TheBoogieman is offline  
post #5 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 05:27 AM
zband
Registered User
 
zband's Avatar
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 475
Quote:
Originally Posted by robncar View Post
If you don't plan to offroad, might as well go with the JK. It's the fav of the soccer moms and nothing crawls the mall better.

I cant agree with you more. The weight (porker) and the design (trying to look like a hummer) seem to appeal to the soccer moms. Stick with the TJ- the last wrangler, IMO.
zband is offline  
post #6 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 05:29 AM
aszalan
Registered User
 
aszalan's Avatar
2000 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fayetteville, AR
Posts: 435
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobbySwiz View Post
I know the JK's have only been out for a couple of years, but how does the new 3.8L engine compare to the older Inline 6?

Anyone who has knowledge on this subject, your help is greatly appreciated, thank you.
the 4.0L inline 6 has been a good engine for the TJ. the V6 in the JK is basically a minivan engine.
aszalan is offline  
post #7 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 05:41 AM
island hopper
Registered User
 
island hopper's Avatar
1999 WJ 
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 276
Go with the TJ....also get the Dana 44 rear and 30 in front. I drove a new JK, but I found a used TJ I liked much more that only had 22,000 miles and all documented maintenance....and I saved almost $10,000
island hopper is offline  
post #8 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 06:10 AM
zband
Registered User
 
zband's Avatar
2003 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Lansing, MI
Posts: 475
4.0L is old design, outdated and inefficient. Yet it seem to be very reliable and has garnered quite a following. 190 hp @ 4,600 rpm and 235 ft-lbs of torque @ 3,200 rpm



The 3.8L originally was in the Dodge Caravan and 215 (5000 rpm) HP and 245 (4000) ft-lbs of torque. The version that is used in the JK has been re-adjusted to 205 hp and 240 ft/lbs of torque- probably because it is a high reving engine. Its not a bad engine, but like I said earlier Jeep (IMO screwed up) buy making the JK heavier, thus negating any advantages to this engine.
zband is offline  
post #9 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 07:31 AM
Unlimited04
This post/info=my opinion
 
Unlimited04's Avatar
2004 LJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 24,165
Unlimited04 is offline  
post #10 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 07:44 AM
lucy4227
Registered User
2004 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: bahrain
Posts: 43
there are so many reasons why I perfer the TJ over the new JKs other than the fact that I have a TJ. The I6 a breeze to work on, if you are into doing maintance yourself, the engine is "bulletproof". You can also get a better deal on a used TJ than a newer body style JK. Just like any other vehicle when a new body style comes out the price of the older body style will be negotiated easier. Whatever you decide do yourself a favor and get the Dana 44, or even better yet get a rubicon. If want to lift it and get bigger tires down the road even just "just for looks" it comes with 4.10 gears and it will save you money on gears and such. Besides you never know if you will get the wheelin bug after you get a jeep, and you will already have a lot of upgrades that some of us are still working on getting.
lucy4227 is offline  
post #11 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 08:39 AM
minileprechaun
Registered User
1999 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: maryland
Posts: 238
Go for an LJ .. if I could do it again, that's what I'd get. Enough room for a backseat and junk in the trunk!
minileprechaun is offline  
post #12 of 14 Old 05-06-2008, 09:58 AM
Xlr8n
Registered User
1986 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: midwest
Posts: 2,922
Drive both. Pick the one you like best. It's a personal preference thing as they are both good off-roaders and both have their pluses and minuses.
Xlr8n is offline  
post #13 of 14 Old 05-14-2008, 09:05 PM
Wheels4
Registered User
 
Wheels4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Decatur, AL
Posts: 153
i've recently test driven the 08 4dr and an 06 unlimited... both felt as if they had the same amount of power to me. both were manuals. i've been reading alot of negative comments about the JK's power... but, zband said it best referring to the weight/power ratios. xlr8n is right... just test drive both and see which one you like.

my personal deciding factor is going to be the fact that i can upgrade the pee pee out of the TJ unlimited cheaper than i can a JK.
Wheels4 is offline  
post #14 of 14 Old 05-15-2008, 04:55 PM
NEVERSWEAT
Northman
 
NEVERSWEAT's Avatar
2006 TJ Wrangler 
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 318
Quote:
Originally Posted by robncar View Post
If you don't plan to offroad, might as well go with the JK. It's the fav of the soccer moms and nothing crawls the mall better.
I second that! Saw a new one yesterday lifted and tricked out which might see a little light beach sand duty. With all the new trinkets it has...all designed for creature comforts but stacked to roll like thunder. You will have the most capable of grocery getters and then able to play hell on rocks if you so should choose.

Uncle Willy, The InnKeeper #3
06 Rubicon locked and loaded....
NEVERSWEAT is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Jeep Forums Replies Last Post
Wrangler UnHelp limited Sahara or Wrangler Unlimited Rubicon first buyer whats better shandcraig Jeep Buying Forum 3 12-16-2009 05:47 PM
This Wrangler Is.....Wow.... Geister Jeep Buying Forum 5 12-05-2009 03:12 AM
CJ vs Wrangler? sjc115 Jeep Buying Forum 22 07-13-2009 08:53 AM
04-06 LJ Wrangler Blake686 Jeep Buying Forum 3 07-10-2009 03:03 AM
wrangler help mdf27 Jeep Buying Forum 1 06-06-2008 09:11 PM

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome