you know you drive a ZJ when... - Page 413 - JeepForum.com

 2Likes
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
post #6181 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 11:56 AM
S8NNG8
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Helena
Posts: 8,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickpequignot View Post

He is so contradicting on him self when he posts.....
Schizo


D3<!L!>3D
S8NNG8 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
post #6182 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 12:11 PM
noodles5124
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: danbury
Posts: 723
Quote:
Originally Posted by dnuccio
I used to think the ZJs engine bay was tight with the v8, then I worked on a Hyundai Tiburon in auto shop. The entire passenger side front suspension has to be disassembled to replace the alternator.
Had to pull the axle the do the alternator in a ford escape
noodles5124 is offline  
post #6183 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 12:38 PM
McCloudsZJ
Because RaceJeep
 
McCloudsZJ's Avatar
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Roanoke
Posts: 2,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midnightluckey View Post
If you had ever spent all of five minutes working on a full size Chevrolet van, you wouldn't have one bad thing to say about the engine bay in a Zj. The one we used to had must've had something like a 16" hood.
This one takes the cake. I've worked on some stupid cars in my past
  • 2002 VW Bug--Wheels and fenders have to come off to get at the radiator
  • 2001 Mini Cooper--PS Pump... This one still gives me nightmares
  • 2001 Hyundai Elantra--Tried to eat me alive. I have scars up to my elbows from replacing the timing chain.
  • 1999 Nissan Maxima--To remove the alternator, the car has to be up in the air, front wheel removed, wheel wells removed, AC compressor totally removed, PS pump relocated
  • 2009 Chevy 2500 Van--**** that van. There's a V8 somewhere under there...



So... You know you own a ZJ when you can appreciate just how spacious the engine bay is. It's not quite like my old truck where I could sit on the bumper, put both feet on the frame rails, and just work on the 318 all day long, but it's really not that bad.

March 2014 GCOTM. 1998 Deep Slate 5.9
On the Jeep:Hot intake, 52mm TB, Summit 8mm wires, catch can, 703s, insulated fuel rails, indexed Champions, Bilstein 4600s, Eibach lowering springs, Moog SS, Ironman mounts, Lotek 2GP, lots of gauges, sparkly paint.
In the garage: M1 4bbl
In the works: Addco/Hellwig sway bars, nitrous, full polly bushings, full exhaust, data logging, billet UD pulleys
McCloudsZJ is offline  
post #6184 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 12:47 PM
S8NNG8
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Helena
Posts: 8,536
Don't the V8's have more pulley clearance than the I6?

D3<!L!>3D
S8NNG8 is offline  
post #6185 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 12:52 PM
Concolour
Registered User
1994 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Calgary
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicMC

No, it was rear-ended. We had to cut the downpipes because there's no getting at the bolts that connect them to the manifolds, normally, and the bolts were rusted shut anyway. The downpipes kept catching on the UCA mounts and passenger side motor mount. The 4.0 would have come out with the whole exhaust still attached, I reckon.

Problem with the V8 is it was added as an afterthought. It was designed for a truck big enough that you can sit in the engine bay and change the spark plugs, not a midsize SUV, and that fact shows. Hell, it was such an afterthought, they didn't even have production sorted when the ZJ launched in late '92. It wasn't until, I wanna say, February '93 when they started rolling off the line with V8s.

The ZJ was designed around the 4.0 platform and it shows. It may not be as powerful or torquey as the V8, but it fits better, and a forced induction L6 is less passe than a blown V8.
When a vehicle lands on the dealership lot has nothing to do with how ready they are. It's largely to do with assembly line capacities. Hell, we just started receiving 3.6 rams a few weeks ago. And let me tell you, that wasn't an afterthought
Concolour is offline  
post #6186 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 01:54 PM
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8NNG8 View Post
Don't the V8's have more pulley clearance than the I6?
I believe so

Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline  
post #6187 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 02:47 PM
davigzj
Registered User
1997 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Monroe
Posts: 817
"bristol is racing"
davigzj is offline  
post #6188 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 03:34 PM
nickpequignot
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: columbia city
Posts: 2,829
When over spring break,instead of going anywhere you volunteer to work and are going to work a ton of hours and make a bunch of money so you can buy a dd and treat the jeep like a jeep should.

96 limited build thread-http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/96-limited-build-1351732/
nickpequignot is offline  
post #6189 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:28 PM
LunaMoona
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by SchizophrenicMC View Post

The ZJ was designed around the 4.0 platform and it shows. It may not be as powerful or torquey as the V8, but it fits better, and a forced induction L6 is less passe than a blown V8.
Well, first of all, by forced induction I assume you mean a turbo, and a turbo is just a different kind of supercharger.

Secondly, most "passe" blown V8s will blow the doors off of those "unique" turbo L6s. But hey, do whatever makes you happy...
LunaMoona is offline  
post #6190 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:32 PM
S8NNG8
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Helena
Posts: 8,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunaMoona View Post

Well, first of all, by forced induction I assume you mean a turbo, and a turbo is just a different kind of supercharger.

Secondly, most "passe" blown V8s will blow the doors off of those "unique" turbo L6. But hey, do whatever makes you happy...
I think his point was the unibody was never built to handle the power of a blown V8. It'd be within its limits with a turbo I6

D3<!L!>3D
S8NNG8 is offline  
post #6191 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:34 PM
nickpequignot
Registered User
1996 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: columbia city
Posts: 2,829
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8NNG8

I think his point was the unibody was never built to handle the power of a blown V8. It'd be within its limits with a turbo I6
Yeah it will defiantly hold up to a blown v8.its been done so many times that if there were a problem that would happen. It would have already.

96 limited build thread-http://www.jeepforum.com/forum/f13/96-limited-build-1351732/
nickpequignot is offline  
post #6192 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:34 PM
dnuccio
Registered User
1995 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 3,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunaMoona View Post
Well, first of all, by forced induction I assume you mean a turbo, and a turbo is just a different kind of supercharger.

Secondly, most "passe" blown V8s will blow the doors off of those "unique" turbo L6s. But hey, do whatever makes you happy...
his whole argument is that there's more room in a ZJ to turbo a 4.0 then to supercharge a 5.2/5.9

Reliability is relative
R.I.P. Ratmonkey
dnuccio is offline  
post #6193 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:35 PM
LunaMoona
Registered User
1993 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Durango, Colorado
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8NNG8 View Post
I think his point was the unibody was never built to handle the power of a blown V8. It'd be within its limits with a turbo I6
Which is bull****. The ZJ can handle power perfectly fine.

But I think I get what you're saying.
LunaMoona is offline  
post #6194 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:37 PM
S8NNG8
Registered User
1995 XJ Cherokee 
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Helena
Posts: 8,536
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickpequignot View Post

Yeah it will defiantly hold up to a blown v8.
A 5.9 might handle, those bodys got some reinforcement. But like mine, which came with a 4.0, the body strength got some cost cuts.

D3<!L!>3D
S8NNG8 is offline  
post #6195 of 10778 Old 03-17-2013, 04:38 PM
comptiger5000
Registered User
1998 ZJ 
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 4,556
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8NNG8 View Post
A 5.9 might handle, those bodys got some reinforcement. But like mine, which came with a 4.0, the body strength got some cost cuts.
Uh, no. The bodies are identical, there was no extra reinforcement, not even different suspension on the 5.9.
comptiger5000 is offline  
Reply

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the JeepForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid e-mail address for yourself.



Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page



Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome